Author Topic: WTC BLDG. 7  (Read 29591 times)

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #100 on: September 27, 2012, 10:52:14 PM »
I'd like you denyers to watch this. And try to come up with a reasonable retort to this.





You shouldn't watch shit like that, watch this:


First to go is the penthouse, and when it drops, you see sky through the upstairs windows, because whole facade has collapse with it. Then backside of the house collapse, because there isn't any support to hold it up.  Don't look fake videos, you doesn't learn anything by looking them.

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: WTC BLDG. 7 Conspiracy
« Reply #101 on: September 27, 2012, 10:54:03 PM »
What is causing these mini explosions all over?

Photoshop

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #102 on: September 27, 2012, 10:55:38 PM »
MK-ULTRA: In the 1950s to the 1970s, the CIA ran a mind-control project aimed at finding a “truth serum” to use on communist spies. Test subjects were given LSD and other drugs, often without consent, and some were tortured. At least one man, civilian biochemist Frank Olson, who was working for the government, died as a result of the experiments. The project was finally exposed after investigations by the Rockefeller Commission.

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #103 on: September 27, 2012, 10:57:44 PM »
1990 Testimony of Nayirah: A 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die. The testimony helped gain major public support for the 1991 Gulf War, but — despite protests that the dispute of this story was itself a conspiracy theory — it was later discovered that the testimony was false. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony.  It turned out that she had taken acting lessons on request of the CIA and was actually the niece of a major politician in Kuwait.  Nayirah was later disclosed to be Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA.  The Congressional Human Rights Caucus, of which Congressman Tom Lantos was co-chairman, had been responsible for hosting Nurse Nayirah, and thereby popularizing her allegations. When the girl’s account was later challenged by independent human rights monitors, Lantos replied, “The notion that any of the witnesses brought to the caucus through the Kuwaiti Embassy would not be credible did not cross my mind… I have no basis for assuming that her story is not true, but the point goes beyond that. If one hypothesizes that the woman’s story is fictitious from A to Z, that in no way diminishes the avalanche of human rights violations.” Nevertheless, the senior Republican on the Human Rights Caucus, John Edward Porter, responded to the revelations “by saying that if he had known the girl was the ambassador’s daughter, he would not have allowed her to testify.”

Busted

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2178
  • PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM MOWER
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #104 on: September 27, 2012, 11:02:15 PM »
Lots of Americans were happy... Esp those who were under investigations from the highest levels... Considering the FBI, CIA, Secrete Service files for some of the worlds largest scandals where in that building... Enron, GOldMan Sachs, Fraud on Wall Street etc...

Yes, all Americans are mad that "Building 7" was destroyed. LOL!!!! Who gives a fuck about WTC building 7? Nobody. Why would the goverment destroy building 7? They didn't.

RS

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 254
  • Getbig!
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #105 on: September 28, 2012, 04:19:58 AM »
I'd like you denyers to watch this. And try to come up with a reasonable retort to this.




Interesting. More to all this than meets the eye. Thx for the post dude!

RS

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 254
  • Getbig!
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #106 on: September 28, 2012, 04:21:55 AM »
This guy Wiggs is a f-ng Idiot . Many like him though. Hope he goes away !


Fu$% -off tool bag.  Wiggs is right.  you cannot watch the vids and think it all went down from a couple internal fires.  Only a moron or the American general public will believe that. Bunch of sheep if you ask me.

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12407
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #107 on: September 28, 2012, 05:21:43 AM »
Fu$% -off tool bag.  Wiggs is right.  you cannot watch the vids and think it all went down from a couple internal fires.  Only a moron or the American general public will believe that. Bunch of sheep if you ask me.

Hi Wiggs.
!

3Dkiller

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1533
  • Fuck The New World Order
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #108 on: September 28, 2012, 06:30:25 AM »
TEAM WOLF

viking1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5173
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #109 on: September 28, 2012, 07:16:30 AM »
Ironically, this Rap Duo's album dropped on 9/11/01...     Did they have advanced notice? Rapper Conspiracy.



jprc10

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 434
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #110 on: September 28, 2012, 07:36:44 AM »
This government is bunch of clueless idiots and you think they can pull off 9/11? Hahahah, you are fucking dumb, dude. I didn't want to be an asshole about it before, but the fact that you are even still talking about this makes it sound like you are borderline ass-burger autism or maybe have weed related brain damage.

They're not as clueless as you think, in fact something similar was planned way back in the 60s.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/northwoods.html

jprc10

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 434
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #111 on: September 28, 2012, 07:37:45 AM »
oh yeah and once more


Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #112 on: September 28, 2012, 07:56:14 AM »

daddy8ball

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 958
  • Violence is not the answer. It is the question.
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #113 on: September 28, 2012, 08:01:08 AM »
The answer is "yes".

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #114 on: September 28, 2012, 09:42:59 AM »
1990 Testimony of Nayirah: A 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die. The testimony helped gain major public support for the 1991 Gulf War, but — despite protests that the dispute of this story was itself a conspiracy theory — it was later discovered that the testimony was false. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony.  It turned out that she had taken acting lessons on request of the CIA and was actually the niece of a major politician in Kuwait.  Nayirah was later disclosed to be Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA.  The Congressional Human Rights Caucus, of which Congressman Tom Lantos was co-chairman, had been responsible for hosting Nurse Nayirah, and thereby popularizing her allegations. When the girl’s account was later challenged by independent human rights monitors, Lantos replied, “The notion that any of the witnesses brought to the caucus through the Kuwaiti Embassy would not be credible did not cross my mind… I have no basis for assuming that her story is not true, but the point goes beyond that. If one hypothesizes that the woman’s story is fictitious from A to Z, that in no way diminishes the avalanche of human rights violations.” Nevertheless, the senior Republican on the Human Rights Caucus, John Edward Porter, responded to the revelations “by saying that if he had known the girl was the ambassador’s daughter, he would not have allowed her to testify.”

Oh no, lets get our favorite Female getbigger Dina Al-Sabah in here to confirm.

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #115 on: September 29, 2012, 07:30:01 PM »

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #116 on: September 30, 2012, 12:27:45 AM »


What a load of bullshit. They even use this ridiculous picture what we see before video starts. Picture with pieces of material, which they claim to be nanothermite. Why it is ridiculous? Well, there is few problems with it. First of all, nanothermite is based on nanoparticles, which are small. Word nano comes from the word nano millimeter, which means 0.000 000 001 mm, so the particles in the nanomaterial are quite small. One nano from side to side. When we look at that picture, there is scale in it:



And the scale tells us that the particles in the picture are up to 200-300 µm from side to side. µm means micrometer, which is 0.000 001 mm. Do you understand the difference? Nano is one milliardth, micro is one millionth from the millimeter. What is the difference between million and like you say, billion. Think about it. It is same than show a picture of the elephant to prove that there is mouses in the jungle. Those prefix can be bitches, if you live in country which measures all by inches.

Next problem is simple. According those "specialists", there were used "thousand of tons of nano thermite" despite the fact that there was no technical way to produce a such quantity of nanomaterials. It has been invented later, after the 9/11.

How about the evidence they use, where it come from? Harrit publish his study years after the 9/11, 2007-2009, so where he get those evidence? Not from the ground zero, but from the public, who has taken them years earlier from different stages of ground zero as a souvenir. There is nothing which proves that those souvenirs has been taken right after collapse, so they most likely has been taken during the grubbing up of the ruins. Ground zero hasn't been playground for anonymous public after the 9/11, so those evidence can come anywhere. Whether they are contaminated over the years? God only knows. What comes that study of Harrit, he has been left by himself with it. All scientists which he refers in the study of hes, has wash their hands from that crap.

What about thermite? What you really know about it? When you light it, it reach temperatures up to 3000°C, it forms the superheated liquid which eat its way through the metals. Funny thing is that it is liquid, so it works only in the direction of gravity. It can run on the concrete floor like water, but when it meet metal etc. which it can burn trough, it follows the direction of gravity.

So, what it really was in the picture? Paint. Anti corrosion paint, which normally has similar chemicals in it. Iron oxide, aluminium oxide etc. If you take red anti corrosion paint from 1970 and study it, you find same things than Harrit.

AbrahamG

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18071
  • Team Pfizer
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #117 on: September 30, 2012, 12:31:32 AM »
No way in hell that building fell perfectly straight down into a pile of dust from a fire. It's funny how people will believe anything if they are told a lie enough times.

I'm sure Obama was in Kenya at the time behind the whole thing.

quadzilla456

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3497
  • Getbig!
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #118 on: September 30, 2012, 12:35:11 AM »
This government is bunch of clueless idiots and you think they can pull off 9/11? Hahahah, you are fucking dumb, dude. I didn't want to be an asshole about it before, but the fact that you are even still talking about this makes it sound like you are borderline ass-burger autism or maybe have weed related brain damage.
And ignorant arab hijackers are smarter?

But did they really pull it off? Millions of people think the USA government and Israel did it. You are the moron that believes the story of "clueless idiots" as you put it.

flipper5470

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1401
  • Getbig!
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #119 on: September 30, 2012, 06:29:28 AM »
Millions of people believe that Elvis is alive....at one time or another BILLIONS of people believed in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the concept of a "free" lunch...

BIG AL MCKECHNIE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #120 on: September 30, 2012, 06:41:11 AM »
Millions of people believe that Elvis is alive....at one time or another BILLIONS of people believed in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and the concept of a "free" lunch...

Half the dumb kunts in america believe in god lol. and the world was created a few thousand years ago .
The catholic faith is based on 100% mumbo jumbo and choirboy bumfoolery.

elvis bein alive pales into insignificance compared to the beliefs of religion

ukjeff

  • Guest
Re: WTC BLDG. 7
« Reply #121 on: September 30, 2012, 06:52:00 AM »
Quick question.
If it was all planned why hasn't one, just one person come forward and told all in any country in the world, to instal explosives in all the buildings would have taken a massive amount of organising with hundreds if not thousands of people being aware of it.

And not one person with a guilty conscience or some deathbed confession has said anything?