Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
April 23, 2014, 09:24:59 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Elvis,MJ & The Beatles, what order would you see prime versions in concert?  (Read 1556 times)
kevcat
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1048



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: October 15, 2012, 09:46:16 AM »

Looks like alot of homos are in here, who would rather go and see a high pitched man dancing and crotch grabbing, as opposed to an actual band playing guitars etc Embarrassed
Report to moderator   Logged
kevcat
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1048



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: October 15, 2012, 09:47:26 AM »

Elvis, Michael Jackson and then the Beatles.  The Beatles weren't much of a live band in comparison to other acts of the time.  I would have loved to have seen Led Zeppelin, Queen or Journey in their prime.

Are you serious? Explain who were a better live band in the 60s? You know fuck all about music mate  Smiley
Report to moderator   Logged
Mensa Bob
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 4372


KIM JONG IL ORIGINAL BEATIFULL MAN WITH GLASSES


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: October 15, 2012, 12:24:43 PM »

I'd rather watch prime-Beethoven, prime-Vivaldi and prime-Erik Saade
lül wtf
Report to moderator   Logged
Pet shop boys
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 4035

Getbig!


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: October 15, 2012, 12:33:36 PM »

you realize he is lip syncing there.
But it was his prime 1983.




WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Report to moderator   Logged
Man of Steel
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 14024


Isaiah 40:28-31 ✝


View Profile WWW
« Reply #29 on: October 15, 2012, 12:34:59 PM »

MJ
Elvis
Beatles
Report to moderator   Logged

CalvinH
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 17307

The Y boarders are Ron's merry band of misfits.


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: October 15, 2012, 12:47:55 PM »

Beatles
Report to moderator   Logged
El Diablo Blanco
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 16606


Nom Nom Nom Nom


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: October 15, 2012, 12:53:35 PM »

I've seen Michael twice in his prime, on his BAD and Dangerous tour in LA.  Fucking insane.  I would have loved to see Elvis, but only because I've never seen him in person.  But I would put Johnny Cash ahead of Elvis.
Report to moderator   Logged
CalvinH
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 17307

The Y boarders are Ron's merry band of misfits.


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: October 15, 2012, 12:58:17 PM »

I've seen Michael twice in his prime, on his BAD and Dangerous tour in LA.  Fucking insane.  I would have loved to see Elvis, but only because I've never seen him in person.  But I would put Johnny Cash ahead of Elvis.


You didn't see him when he played in Folsom Huh Grin
Report to moderator   Logged
Viking11
Competitors
Getbig IV
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1369


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: October 15, 2012, 02:53:40 PM »

Of this list- 1. Beatles- Hamburg era, 2. Elvis- Sun Records era.  Off the list 3.Doors - Whisky era, 4. Stones circa 1969.
Report to moderator   Logged
The Effervescent
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22036


I'm Groink...no need to start crying


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: October 15, 2012, 03:03:51 PM »

Elvis, Michael Jackson and then the Beatles.  The Beatles weren't much of a live band in comparison to other acts of the time.  I would have loved to have seen Led Zeppelin, Queen or Journey in their prime.

I saw all three, Queen was by far the best live band.  followed by Zep.

Journey i went because a chick that i was boning got tickets, i didn't even pay attention
Report to moderator   Logged
Archer77
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 10078

Team Shizzo


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: October 15, 2012, 03:29:24 PM »

Are you serious? Explain who were a better live band in the 60s? You know fuck all about music mate  Smiley

The Who, Cream, Jimi Hendrix to name a few
Report to moderator   Logged

A
Mr Anabolic
Getbig IV
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2457


"If you don't have it... then don't hit it"


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: October 15, 2012, 03:59:55 PM »

Elvis:  Early concerts only (ie Sun records/Ed Sullivan period).  He was still good when he started playing Vegas in 1970, but he went down hill after a couple years.

Beatles:  Cavern Club and Hamburg period.  Also Shea Stadium in 1965 and their last concert in 1966 Candlestick Park because of the history involved.

MJ:  Not really into MJ, but I would go to see him during the "Thriller" period if someone else bought my ticket.
Report to moderator   Logged
Wiggs
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 30673


Child of Y'srael


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: October 15, 2012, 08:49:02 PM »

MJ
Beatles
Elvis
Report to moderator   Logged

7
uberman
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 9318



View Profile
« Reply #38 on: October 15, 2012, 09:08:48 PM »

Isnt here,and this performance is far better than the Motown one Candizzle posted. I saw the bad tour in London in 88, only songs he lip synched were Smooth Criminal and Man in the Mirror, he could sing all his songs like his albums but used to lip synch to take a breather, songs that required heavy danced routines or being on his knees etc like man in the mirror.He got lazier at he got older until he lip synched most of his songs like the History tour.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ofbf-EpT80Y" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ofbf-EpT80Y</a>
come on... it doesnt sound like the studio versions and you know it... far from it. Cause computers/electronic effects just transform everything, even at that time.
Report to moderator   Logged
PJim
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3361


I took my potatoes down to be mashed.


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: October 16, 2012, 04:33:51 AM »

MJ was a paedo though
Report to moderator   Logged
kevcat
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1048



View Profile
« Reply #40 on: October 16, 2012, 07:32:19 AM »

The Who, Cream, Jimi Hendrix to name a few

Decent acts all of them, but for quality of songs MJ, Elvis and The Beatles easily beat the 3 of them, with the Beatles number 1
Report to moderator   Logged
Tito24
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20532

I'm a large man but.. one with a plan


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: October 16, 2012, 07:33:15 AM »

i saw michaels dangerous concert as a kid, awesome
Report to moderator   Logged
Army of One
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 19306



View Profile
« Reply #42 on: October 16, 2012, 07:33:50 AM »

come on... it doesnt sound like the studio versions and you know it... far from it. Cause computers/electronic effects just transform everything, even at that time.

No it doesnt, but its because he's singing it differently while dancing, the whole performance (dancing included)is better than Motown.Put him in front of a Mic while not in concert and fully rested and Im fairly certain there would be little difference.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!