How to see Paul Dillett small??..

[Sherief Shalaby]

The video didn't show him against yates or nasser, just Levrone and early coleman.

against yates or who??..

also didnt you see before levrone a better bb than nasser??..

[Sherief Shalaby]

same tour the english round..

[Palpatine Q]

against yates or who??..

also didnt you see before levrone a better bb than nasser??..

Overall, no doubt. One contest doesn't make a career.

Nasser looked great there, best he's ever looked. That is a weird video though, and that's probably the only contest I've ever seen where the lighting makes the white guys look better than the black guys

[Sherief Shalaby]

Overall, no doubt. One contest doesn't make a career.

Nasser looked great there, best he's ever looked. That is a weird video though, and that's probably the only contest I've ever seen where the lighting makes the white guys look better than the black guys

so firstly i was posting selected pics and no videos and now the videos are weird .. what is your next excuse gronk??..

no one contest can make a great career but anyway this has nothing to do with nasser who was always on at his best for more than 5 years..

[ARNIE1947]

 

[Palpatine Q]

so firstly i was posting selected pics and no videos and now the videos are weird .. what is your next excuse gronk??..

no one contest can make a great career but anyway this has nothing to do with nasser who was always on at his best for more than 5 years..

I just said he looks great, his best ever.

But that is a weird video, the contrast and aspect is all jacked up.

relax tiny

[El Diablo Blanco]

and from the back he held his own against 2 of the best backs in the history of the sport..

No he doesn't

[Palpatine Q]

No he doesn't5

Sherief has been pushing that bullshit for 5 years, trying to get some traction.

[Parker]

as you yourself said in your previous post nasser and paul were the same weight and according to you now everybody knows that paul had a better shape rounder bla bla bla... so why do you think nasser was always beating him???.. in all fairness at their very best i see nasser better in all poses..

Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.

Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.

Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two  whose shape carried him to more wins.

Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.

[Palpatine Q]

Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.

Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.

Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two  whose shape carried him to more wins.

Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.

I think Nasser beats him, best to best.

Dillet was a freak of nature, probably the most impressive specimen ever, just looking at him standing there.

But he never came in in the type of conditon needed to win shows, Nasser was always in shape.

and his flaws were atrocious...he looked like a fucking retard onstage and his back was worse than nassers

[disco_stu]

just like branch is massive...nasser was too.

both a steaming pile of turd.

lumps of muscle stacked on top of itself.

there were and have been, since, better BODYBUILDERS.

the key to both not winning is a massive midsection...

[Jaime]

Did someone use a microwave to take these pictures? Great picture quality.

[cephissus]

just like branch is massive...nasser was too.

both a steaming pile of turd.

lumps of muscle stacked on top of itself.

there were and have been, since, better BODYBUILDERS.

the key to both not winning is a massive midsection...

does anyone care what this guy says

[Shockwave]

I think Nasser beats him, best to best.

Dillet was a freak of nature, probably the most impressive specimen ever, just looking at him standing there.

But he never came in in the type of conditon needed to win shows, Nasser was always in shape.

and his flaws were atrocious...he looked like a fucking retard onstage and his back was worse than nassers

I'd say Nasser USUALLY came in shape. Later in his career it was a crapshoot.

[Palpatine Q]

I'd say Nasser USUALLY came in shape. Later in his career it was a crapshoot.

I'm talking about his prime years. Nasser from 98 on completely fell apart, palumboism and synthol are a bad combination 

[Shockwave]

I'm talking about his prime years. Nasser from 98 on completely fell apart, palumboism and synthol are a bad combination 

Ah, roger that.

[Sherief Shalaby]

what i mean is this.

if they both died and some butcher would peel their muscles off the bones, muscle for muscle, thered be more meat in size and weight from dillets corpse.

nasser would be all stomach weight.

nasser was bigger in all parts even arms and shoulders which were paul's best and biggest parts.. check the pic. well..

as for the butcher thing i think nasser would taste better

[Jaime]

nasser was bigger in all parts even arms and shoulders which were paul's best and biggest parts.. check the pic. well..

as for the butcher thing i think nasser would taste better

No he wasn't, that's one pic, Dillet had bigger arms and shoulders than Nasser, Nasser had to abuse SEO to get his arms over 19 inches.

[Sherief Shalaby]

Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.

Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.

Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two  whose shape carried him to more wins.

Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.

no because it was always going to nasser's way .. in 96 both were at their best or very close and nasser beat him 7 times, 6 if you dont want to count the olympia..

[cephissus]

why did nasser get dq'd anyway?

so yates could win again?

[NarcissisticDeity]

and from the back he held his own against 2 of the best backs in the history of the sport..

No he's not lol

[Sherief Shalaby]

why did nasser get dq'd anyway?

so yates could win again?

because he failed a diuretic test.. the same test jay cutler failed in 2001 but was not dq'd

this is why team nasser doesnt accept this disqualification

[Sherief Shalaby]

No he's not lol

in the RLS he did.. actually imo he beat ronnie in this pose in 96.. check the comparison video again..

[the_swami]

Nasser 95-98 was an amazing BB, one of the greatest ever

never has there been such a combination of massive size, tiny waist, ripped conditioning and hardness, shape and symmetry.

Nasser was not blocky, he had an incredible V taper and aesthetic shape.

Nasser's back in those years was as thick and wide as Yates but just not as dry hence looked slightly less detailed.

It is erroneous to say nasser had a weak back, Paul Dillet had a weak back

[NarcissisticDeity]

Nasser 95-98 was an amazing BB, one of the greatest ever

never has there been such a combination of massive size, tiny waist, ripped conditioning and hardness, shape and symmetry.

Nasser was not blocky, he had an incredible V taper and aesthetic shape.

Nasser's back in those years was as thick and wide as Yates but just not as dry hence looked slightly less detailed.

It is erroneous to say nasser had a weak back, Paul Dillet had a weak back

Nasser admitted he had a weak back , it's blatantly obvious to anyone who doesn't purchase his underwear. His back sucked

Great bodybuilder from the front though