Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
September 01, 2014, 09:28:02 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: How to see Paul Dillett small??..  (Read 5451 times)
Sherief Shalaby
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 10581


Team Nasser


« Reply #25 on: November 14, 2012, 10:33:08 AM »

The video didn't show him against yates or nasser, just Levrone and early coleman.

against yates or who??.. Roll Eyes

also didnt you see before levrone a better bb than nasser??..
Report to moderator   Logged
Sherief Shalaby
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 10581


Team Nasser


« Reply #26 on: November 14, 2012, 10:40:31 AM »

same tour the english round..

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duJqGYf77pc" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duJqGYf77pc</a>
Report to moderator   Logged
The Effervescent
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22887


You < cotton ball


« Reply #27 on: November 14, 2012, 10:41:21 AM »

against yates or who??.. Roll Eyes

also didnt you see before levrone a better bb than nasser??..


Overall, no doubt. One contest doesn't make a career.

Nasser looked great there, best he's ever looked. That is a weird video though, and that's probably the only contest I've ever seen where the lighting makes the white guys look better than the black guys
Report to moderator   Logged
Sherief Shalaby
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 10581


Team Nasser


« Reply #28 on: November 14, 2012, 10:47:05 AM »


Overall, no doubt. One contest doesn't make a career.

Nasser looked great there, best he's ever looked. That is a weird video though, and that's probably the only contest I've ever seen where the lighting makes the white guys look better than the black guys

so firstly i was posting selected pics and no videos and now the videos are weird Roll Eyes.. what is your next excuse gronk??..

no one contest can make a great career but anyway this has nothing to do with nasser who was always on at his best for more than 5 years..
Report to moderator   Logged
ARNIE1947
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1112



« Reply #29 on: November 14, 2012, 10:49:04 AM »

 Smiley


* LOUdillet.jpg (77.46 KB, 380x520 - viewed 678 times.)

* 859f7-IMGP0589.jpg (120.92 KB, 420x315 - viewed 506 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
The Effervescent
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22887


You < cotton ball


« Reply #30 on: November 14, 2012, 10:50:33 AM »

so firstly i was posting selected pics and no videos and now the videos are weird Roll Eyes.. what is your next excuse gronk??..

no one contest can make a great career but anyway this has nothing to do with nasser who was always on at his best for more than 5 years..

I just said he looks great, his best ever.

But that is a weird video, the contrast and aspect is all jacked up.

relax tiny
Report to moderator   Logged
El Diablo Blanco
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 17235


Nom Nom Nom Nom


« Reply #31 on: November 14, 2012, 11:18:16 AM »

and from the back he held his own against 2 of the best backs in the history of the sport..

No he doesn't
Report to moderator   Logged
The Effervescent
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22887


You < cotton ball


« Reply #32 on: November 14, 2012, 11:23:44 AM »

No he doesn't5

Sherief has been pushing that bullshit for 5 years, trying to get some traction.
Report to moderator   Logged
Parker
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 44653


Autobots, Transform and Roll Out!


« Reply #33 on: November 14, 2012, 11:37:18 AM »

as you yourself said in your previous post nasser and paul were the same weight and according to you now everybody knows that paul had a better shape rounder bla bla bla... so why do you think nasser was always beating him???.. in all fairness at their very best i see nasser better in all poses..
Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.

Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.

Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two  whose shape carried him to more wins.

Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.
Report to moderator   Logged
The Effervescent
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22887


You < cotton ball


« Reply #34 on: November 14, 2012, 11:43:38 AM »

Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.

Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.

Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two  whose shape carried him to more wins.

Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.

I think Nasser beats him, best to best.

Dillet was a freak of nature, probably the most impressive specimen ever, just looking at him standing there.

But he never came in in the type of conditon needed to win shows, Nasser was always in shape.

and his flaws were atrocious...he looked like a fucking retard onstage and his back was worse than nassers
Report to moderator   Logged
disco_stu
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 4704


I'm a llama!


« Reply #35 on: November 14, 2012, 12:30:38 PM »

just like branch is massive...nasser was too.

both a steaming pile of turd.

lumps of muscle stacked on top of itself.

there were and have been, since, better BODYBUILDERS.

the key to both not winning is a massive midsection...

Report to moderator   Logged
Jaime
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 4942


North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.


« Reply #36 on: November 14, 2012, 12:38:55 PM »

Did someone use a microwave to take these pictures? Great picture quality.
Report to moderator   Logged

Trans Milkshake.
cephissus
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4836



« Reply #37 on: November 14, 2012, 12:45:27 PM »

just like branch is massive...nasser was too.

both a steaming pile of turd.

lumps of muscle stacked on top of itself.

there were and have been, since, better BODYBUILDERS.

the key to both not winning is a massive midsection...



does anyone care what this guy says Huh
Report to moderator   Logged
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 19668


Decepticons! Scramble!


« Reply #38 on: November 14, 2012, 12:49:14 PM »

I think Nasser beats him, best to best.

Dillet was a freak of nature, probably the most impressive specimen ever, just looking at him standing there.

But he never came in in the type of conditon needed to win shows, Nasser was always in shape.

and his flaws were atrocious...he looked like a fucking retard onstage and his back was worse than nassers
I'd say Nasser USUALLY came in shape. Later in his career it was a crapshoot.
Report to moderator   Logged
The Effervescent
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 22887


You < cotton ball


« Reply #39 on: November 14, 2012, 12:51:43 PM »

I'd say Nasser USUALLY came in shape. Later in his career it was a crapshoot.

I'm talking about his prime years. Nasser from 98 on completely fell apart, palumboism and synthol are a bad combination  Grin
Report to moderator   Logged
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 19668


Decepticons! Scramble!


« Reply #40 on: November 14, 2012, 12:53:24 PM »

I'm talking about his prime years. Nasser from 98 on completely fell apart, palumboism and synthol are a bad combination  Grin
Ah, roger that.
Report to moderator   Logged
Sherief Shalaby
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 10581


Team Nasser


« Reply #41 on: November 14, 2012, 01:40:21 PM »

what i mean is this.

if they both died and some butcher would peel their muscles off the bones, muscle for muscle, thered be more meat in size and weight from dillets corpse.

nasser would be all stomach weight.

nasser was bigger in all parts even arms and shoulders which were paul's best and biggest parts.. check the pic. well..

as for the butcher thing i think nasser would taste better Grin


* 378521_10151143861596889_1825464611_n.jpg (25.57 KB, 400x300 - viewed 368 times.)
Report to moderator   Logged
Jaime
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 4942


North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.


« Reply #42 on: November 14, 2012, 01:42:08 PM »

nasser was bigger in all parts even arms and shoulders which were paul's best and biggest parts.. check the pic. well..

as for the butcher thing i think nasser would taste better Grin


No he wasn't, that's one pic, Dillet had bigger arms and shoulders than Nasser, Nasser had to abuse SEO to get his arms over 19 inches.
Report to moderator   Logged

Trans Milkshake.
Sherief Shalaby
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 10581


Team Nasser


« Reply #43 on: November 14, 2012, 01:43:54 PM »

Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.

Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.

Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two  whose shape carried him to more wins.

Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.

no because it was always going to nasser's way Cool.. in 96 both were at their best or very close and nasser beat him 7 times, 6 if you dont want to count the olympia..
Report to moderator   Logged
cephissus
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 4836



« Reply #44 on: November 14, 2012, 01:47:45 PM »

why did nasser get dq'd anyway?

so yates could win again?
Report to moderator   Logged
NarcissisticDeity
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 43841


I dont care what Ronnie says bc hes not a credible


« Reply #45 on: November 14, 2012, 01:50:03 PM »

and from the back he held his own against 2 of the best backs in the history of the sport..

No he's not lol
Report to moderator   Logged
Sherief Shalaby
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 10581


Team Nasser


« Reply #46 on: November 14, 2012, 01:52:36 PM »

why did nasser get dq'd anyway?

so yates could win again?

because he failed a diuretic test.. the same test jay cutler failed in 2001 but was not dq'd Undecided

this is why team nasser doesnt accept this disqualification Cool Grin
Report to moderator   Logged
Sherief Shalaby
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 10581


Team Nasser


« Reply #47 on: November 14, 2012, 01:54:31 PM »

No he's not lol

in the RLS he did.. actually imo he beat ronnie in this pose in 96.. check the comparison video again..
Report to moderator   Logged
the_swami
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 1770


« Reply #48 on: November 14, 2012, 01:54:48 PM »

Nasser 95-98 was an amazing BB, one of the greatest ever

never has there been such a combination of massive size, tiny waist, ripped conditioning and hardness, shape and symmetry.

Nasser was not blocky, he had an incredible V taper and aesthetic shape.

Nasser's back in those years was as thick and wide as Yates but just not as dry hence looked slightly less detailed.

It is erroneous to say nasser had a weak back, Paul Dillet had a weak back
Report to moderator   Logged
NarcissisticDeity
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 43841


I dont care what Ronnie says bc hes not a credible


« Reply #49 on: November 14, 2012, 01:57:23 PM »

Nasser 95-98 was an amazing BB, one of the greatest ever

never has there been such a combination of massive size, tiny waist, ripped conditioning and hardness, shape and symmetry.

Nasser was not blocky, he had an incredible V taper and aesthetic shape.

Nasser's back in those years was as thick and wide as Yates but just not as dry hence looked slightly less detailed.

It is erroneous to say nasser had a weak back, Paul Dillet had a weak back

Nasser admitted he had a weak back , it's blatantly obvious to anyone who doesn't purchase his underwear. His back sucked

Great bodybuilder from the front though
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!