so no recent examples ?
why didn't the shooter in CT just break into the school and use his bare hands to kill all those kids or why didn't he just set them on fire
you know why
because the gun was a lot easier and more efficient
There were plenty of recent examples in those 3 links...
Easier maybe more efficient not hardly...did you pay attention to my post earlier?
"Guns aren’t even the most lethal mass murder weapon. According to data compiled by Grant Duwe of the Minnesota Department of Corrections, guns killed an average of 4.92 victims per mass murder in the United States during the 20th century, just edging out knives, blunt objects, and bare hands, which killed 4.52 people per incident. Fire killed 6.82 people per mass murder, while explosives far outpaced the other options at 20.82. Of the 25 deadliest mass murders in the 20th century, only 52 percent involved guns."
Read that again straw explosives are the most efficient
Do you think this kid wouldnt have killed ppl without guns?