Author Topic: ARNOLD CLASSIC COMPARISION 2013 vs 90's  (Read 34334 times)

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
ARNOLD CLASSIC COMPARISION 2013 vs 90's
« on: March 03, 2013, 10:38:10 AM »






......








http://www.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_PB60976_XUJIDJONLS.jpg
http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_PB61169_WGTWIVPEIH.jpg


tone looks shrivelled..... .... paluski is pregnant so is dex, johhnies leg looks shrivelled

this is bodybuilding   :-\
choice is an illusion

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2013, 10:56:38 AM »




 :-\
choice is an illusion

erics

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 428
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2013, 11:06:02 AM »
What do you expect?

The judges are destroying bodybuilding.

If a judge, official or any other person commentating on bodybuilding tells you that the judges can only judge what is being presented, slap them in the face and call them out for being a mentally lazy son of a bitch.

When they say that, they are putting the responsibility on the bodybuilders and taking it away from themselves.

Useless fools, the lot of them.

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11568
  • Getbig!
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2013, 11:08:53 AM »
Wao  anyone from this particular line up looks far superior than anyone of this years competetors.




Look closely at the pic, cause those days are gone.

maybe its the new icing on the cake now.

WOOSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Henda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12206
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2013, 11:35:26 AM »
It really has gone to utter shit

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2013, 11:41:54 AM »
The women were in better shape


WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2013, 11:42:45 AM »

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2013, 11:47:10 AM »
It really has gone to utter shit

Long time ago





Henda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12206
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #8 on: March 03, 2013, 11:56:49 AM »
Long time ago






That really shows how shitty bbing is nowadays.
Look phenominal in the first pic

erics

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 428
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #9 on: March 03, 2013, 11:57:25 AM »
It really has gone to utter shit

Agree.

erics

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 428
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #10 on: March 03, 2013, 12:02:00 PM »
That really shows how shitty bbing is nowadays.
Look phenominal in the first pic

What does someone like Ronnie or Jay say when they see that comparison?

I mean, Ronnie is supposedly the greatest bodybuilder in history. Does he look at that picture and say to himself, "Yeah, but bodybuilding has progress since then. We're bigger and more muscular now."

 ::)

Henda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12206
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #11 on: March 03, 2013, 12:31:07 PM »
What does someone like Ronnie or Jay say when they see that comparison?

I mean, Ronnie is supposedly the greatest bodybuilder in history. Does he look at that picture and say to himself, "Yeah, but bodybuilding has progress since then. We're bigger and more muscular now."

 ::)

they bareley look human compared to the first pic.
Sure they are big and impressive but they also look like hammered shit in that pose.

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #12 on: March 03, 2013, 12:34:49 PM »
Ben pakman pregoman Pakulski

NotSure

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 678
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #13 on: March 03, 2013, 12:39:16 PM »
Wao  anyone from this particular line up looks far superior than anyone of this years competetors.




Look closely at the pic, cause those days are gone.

maybe its the new icing on the cake now.

WOOSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
This goes right down to the local level. They (the NPC) run off all the good competitors with potential to do well.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #14 on: March 03, 2013, 01:10:38 PM »
the last good year was probably 2000 after that .... it became all garbge....

the stupid ripped glute phenomenon ...
i persoanlly have never looked at a bbers glutes why is that such a huuuuge gactor when the same bodybuilder has a pregnant beer gut....  while being ripped with ripped glutes...



choice is an illusion

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2013, 01:15:54 PM »
What do you expect?

The judges are destroying bodybuilding.

If a judge, official or any other person commentating on bodybuilding tells you that the judges can only judge what is being presented, slap them in the face and call them out for being a mentally lazy son of a bitch.

When they say that, they are putting the responsibility on the bodybuilders and taking it away from themselves.

Useless fools, the lot of them.
agree...100%
choice is an illusion

polychronopolous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: ARNOLD CLASSIC COMPARISION 2013 vs 90's
« Reply #16 on: March 03, 2013, 01:55:06 PM »
"C'mon, turn around and hike up your shorts...don't be shy...let's see those glutes" - Dave Palumbo

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: ARNOLD CLASSIC COMPARISION 2013 vs 90's
« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2013, 01:56:26 PM »
Ronnie Coleman with a strong V taper, and what appears to be a vacuum?

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #18 on: March 03, 2013, 01:59:59 PM »
Long time ago






That right there looks like bodybuildings peak to me.

slate

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1804
Re: Arnold classic comparision
« Reply #19 on: March 03, 2013, 02:06:17 PM »
the last good year was probably 2000 after that .... it became all garbge....

the stupid ripped glute phenomenon ...
i persoanlly have never looked at a bbers glutes why is that such a huuuuge gactor when the same bodybuilder has a pregnant beer gut....  while being ripped with ripped glutes...


apparently the douche bag gaspari is ultimately responsible for the shredded glute crap- that is they said (as a compliment) when they gave him the lifetime award yesterday

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Re: ARNOLD CLASSIC COMPARISION 2013 vs 90's
« Reply #20 on: March 03, 2013, 02:08:21 PM »
These giant stomachs are the real problem.  The general public must find that disgusting.  No wonder this shit isn't on ESPN anymore.

What causes it?  I've heard enlarged organs?  GH?

???

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: ARNOLD CLASSIC COMPARISION 2013 vs 90's
« Reply #21 on: March 03, 2013, 02:08:35 PM »
The 90's guys started this mess and they to had big guts , pics being compared from 90's are flexed so looking tight and diff angles - the big guts were there in the 90s , the only thing superior was the condition of the 90s guys - Che's pic is BB, as back in the 80s and pre then BB was not about being as big and freaky as humanly possible and how much you weighed but about creating an illusion and sculpting the perfect physique.

Not many can get away with carrying huge amounts of muscle unless of course you have the structure to carry it - Ced has it and so does Toney so there waists always look tiny..

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: ARNOLD CLASSIC COMPARISION 2013 vs 90's
« Reply #22 on: March 03, 2013, 02:12:21 PM »
The 90's guys started this mess and they to had big guts , pics being compared from 90's are flexed so looking tight and diff angles - the big guts were there in the 90s , the only thing superior was the condition of the 90s guys - Che's pic is BB, as back in the 80s and pre then BB was not about being as big and freaky as humanly possible and how much you weighed but about creating an illusion and sculpting the perfect physique.

Not many can get away with carrying huge amounts of muscle unless of course you have the structure to carry it - Ced has it and so does Toney so there waists always look tiny..


 we can always find and off picture of a bber exhaling
but nothing of the 90's look like those guys at the arnold... its not even distention anymore its puffed out and hanging


even in the ab and thight dexter has a gut
... no comparision to te 90's
choice is an illusion

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: ARNOLD CLASSIC COMPARISION 2013 vs 90's
« Reply #23 on: March 03, 2013, 02:18:54 PM »








people need to stop comparing dex to shawn... shawn is far better
choice is an illusion

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: ARNOLD CLASSIC COMPARISION 2013 vs 90's
« Reply #24 on: March 03, 2013, 02:23:01 PM »

 we can always find and off picture of a bber exhaling
but nothing of the 90's look like those guys at the arnold... its not even distention anymore its puffed out and hanging


even in the ab and thight dexter has a gut
... no comparision to te 90's
I do agree that it's now gone to the pack and is just silly, but the 90's to was not completely free of this - it is sad, but I think BB ended in the early 90s - since then it's all about size at all costs, it's progression from each era - with all this extra size the things you must do to achieve it  will have these unsightly side effects unless of course your structure can carry it - most of these guys do not have the structure to carry this extra size and what comes with that huge size is the guts and total unbalance,.

I do agree with you but this did all start in the 90s era and has got progressively worse... PIP BB  :'(