Benny B
Time Out
Getbig V
Gender: 
Posts: 12436
Ron Avidan=Zionist,*RACIST* four-eyed tub of lard!
|
 |
« on: March 05, 2013, 08:05:19 AM » |
|
LOL @ Thurston Howell and his wife 'Lovie'  |
!
|
|
|
Benny B
Time Out
Getbig V
Gender:
Posts: 12436
Ron Avidan=Zionist,*RACIST* four-eyed tub of lard!
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2013, 08:12:26 AM » |
|
Like school on Sunday morning...NO CLASS.  Brooding Loser: Romney Returns, Says Not Being President 'KILLS' Him Lord Romney: Contemptuous, Callous, Condescending and Now in a 47% Hole!
|
!
|
|
|
|
GigantorX
|
|
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2013, 08:20:50 AM » |
|
Yes! Commentary by the crazies on MSNBC....not your best day Benny.
I'm sure you think the bottom 90% of Americans have really been doing super duper well over the last 4 or so years, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purge_WTF
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2013, 08:26:50 AM » |
|
Quite honestly, I'd prefer a Conservative President with a middle-class background.
|
Psalm 23.
|
|
|
Benny B
Time Out
Getbig V
Gender:
Posts: 12436
Ron Avidan=Zionist,*RACIST* four-eyed tub of lard!
|
|
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2013, 01:15:23 AM » |
|
 Romney won 24 states:
- 9 of the 11 Confederate states. - 8 of the 10 states with the lowest population density - 0 of the 10 best educated states (based on percent of population with a college degree, median household income and percent of population below the federal poverty line) - 9 of the 10 least educated states - 1 of the 10 healthiest states - 9 of the 10 least healthy states - 9 of the 10 largest net recipients ("takers") of federal money states.
|
!
|
|
|
|
whork
|
|
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2013, 06:00:31 AM » |
|
LOL @ Thurston Howell and his wife 'Lovie' 2 very sad people. The only thing more sad is the people who support them. |
|
|
|
|
|
Shockwave
|
|
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2013, 06:18:34 AM » |
|
Romney won 24 states:
- 9 of the 11 Confederate states. - 8 of the 10 states with the lowest population density - 0 of the 10 best educated states (based on percent of population with a college degree, median household income and percent of population below the federal poverty line) - 9 of the 10 least educated states - 1 of the 10 healthiest states - 9 of the 10 least healthy states - 9 of the 10 largest net recipients ("takers") of federal money states. Yeah, Romney sucked, and I think we all knew it. |
|
|
|
|
|
24KT
|
|
« Reply #7 on: March 10, 2013, 04:36:45 PM » |
|
Yeah, Romney sucked, and I think we all knew it.
LOL ...well not quite everyone knew it, ...some thought there would be a LANDSLIDE!!!!!!.  |
w
|
|
|
|
whork
|
|
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2013, 05:46:21 PM » |
|
Yeah, Romney sucked, and I think we all knew it.
Sad that is the best the GOP has to offer. |
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
|
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2013, 05:48:49 PM » |
|
lol is romney taking over for bush as the distraction for the obama admin benson?
|
|
|
|
|
|
whork
|
|
« Reply #10 on: March 10, 2013, 05:57:23 PM » |
|
lol is romney taking over for bush as the distraction for the obama admin benson?
In a 2 party system you only need to be better than the other party. Sad but true. |
|
|
|
|
|
chadstallion
|
|
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2013, 10:36:20 AM » |
|
In a 2 party system you only need to be better than the other party.
Sad but true.
and was Mitt really the best the GOP had to offer? I thought the other Mormon was much more qualified. I would have voted for him, if I had to. |
|
|
|
|
whork
|
|
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2013, 02:38:34 PM » |
|
and was Mitt really the best the GOP had to offer?
I thought the other Mormon was much more qualified. I would have voted for him, if I had to.
Mitt is shit and the GOP is too ( the Paul's and maybe 5 other people excluded) soo they actually nominated a guy who represented them well. They axed RP at the convention, remember? |
|
|
|
|
|
240 is Back
|
|
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2013, 05:09:35 PM » |
|
Mitt is shit and the GOP is too ( the Paul's and maybe 5 other people excluded) soo they actually nominated a guy who represented them well.
They axed RP at the convention, remember?
they kept certain delegates and others on a bus circuling so they couldn't be there to vote for RP, remember? They changed the rules AT THE CONVENTION to prevent ron paul from speaking, being recognized, etc. had they treated RP supporters with any respect, some of them might have shown up on election day. Romney got fewer votes than mccain, right? Love them or hate them, there are a lot of ron paul supporters. The party should have treated them better. I was SHOCKED to hear CERTAIN getbiggers who loved RP all along say ing "GOOD!" about them snubbing him in th ename of "party unity".  |
|
|
|
|
24KT
|
|
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2013, 01:39:09 AM » |
|
The Republicans lost the election because they got rid of Ron Paul. Had they not gotten rid of him, he would have swept the conventions, and would have sailed into the White House. Because both parties are serving the same entity, the GOP was content to lose the election, rather than risk real changes and the threat a Paul presidency would have on their boss. Besides, ...it's easy for people to believe Obama was re-elected in a race against Romney, ...but does anyone of you think that a show-down between Obama & Paul would have resulted in an Obama victory? And don't you think there would have been riots in the streets had they announced such a thing? Media can spin only so much.
|
w
|
|
|
|
whork
|
|
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2013, 04:55:29 PM » |
|
The Republicans lost the election because they got rid of Ron Paul. Had they not gotten rid of him, he would have swept the conventions, and would have sailed into the White House. Because both parties are serving the same entity, the GOP was content to lose the election, rather than risk real changes and the threat a Paul presidency would have on their boss. Besides, ...it's easy for people to believe Obama was re-elected in a race against Romney, ...but does anyone of you think that a show-down between Obama & Paul would have resulted in an Obama victory? And don't you think there would have been riots in the streets had they announced such a thing? Media can spin only so much.
Good point. The GOP prefer losing to getting RP in office. They just do the bidding of their owners. No integrety here they sold out a looong time ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
AbrahamG
|
|
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2013, 05:04:33 PM » |
|
lol is romney taking over for bush as the distraction for the obama admin benson?
Make no mistake about it, I disagree with everything you post and think your a dick. But the "Benson" crack did make me laugh. |
|
|
|
|
|
tonymctones
|
|
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2013, 08:13:04 PM » |
|
Make no mistake about it, I disagree with everything you post and think your a dick. But the "Benson" crack did make me laugh.
well lets take this moment to find common gound then... now that thats over, you libtard moron go gay marry someone |
|
|
|
|
|
chadstallion
|
|
« Reply #18 on: March 13, 2013, 01:47:13 PM » |
|
well lets take this moment to find common gound then... now that thats over, you libtard moron go gay marry someone are you available? |
|
|
|
|
Irongrip400
|
|
« Reply #19 on: March 13, 2013, 02:36:26 PM » |
|
We are the only thing holding back a viable third party canidate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
