Best of Getbig - Quotes, Pictures and Videos

[AbrahamG]

I remember he was the guy with the watches and business owner. Was he the same guys who had a page of fine print tattooed on his obliques? Or waa that "Navy Mike"?

That was Navy Mike.  This place broke him.  At least Hankins would be here rumbling had it not been for his untimely and in my view unfortunate banding. 

[joswift]

Navy Mike was a good egg. I vaguely recall something about watches with him. X-Factor portrayed himself as this millionaire CEO tycoon and turns out he was a bum who worked at a computer shop or something.

Navy Mike was on a veterans sick payout and competing in shows

Hes just behind Hankins in the stolen valour category

[MuscleBuff]

Navy Mike was on a veterans sick payout and competing in shows

Hes just behind Hankins in the stolen valour category

He had a bum knee so it was all legit

[joswift]

He had a bum knee so it was all legit

says the guy whos only been here since July

Hi DJ...

[AbrahamG]

Navy Mike was a good egg. I vaguely recall something about watches with him. X-Factor portrayed himself as this millionaire CEO tycoon and turns out he was a bum who worked at a computer shop or something.

Both pussies.  Choose your heroes wisely. 

[MuscleBuff]

says the guy whos only been here since July

Hi DJ...

Never heard of him.

[MuscleBuff]

Navymike was the kind of guy to wake up with veins in his lower abs (when stretching out) and conclude he was contest ready despite having 20lbs of bloat and lard to lose on his face alone. Huge delusions

[NaturalWonder83]

Navy Mike was on a veterans sick payout and competing in shows

Hes just behind Hankins in the stolen valour category

I forgot about that. I stand corrected.

[NaturalWonder83]

Both pussies.  Choose your heroes wisely.

I was wrong and didn’t remember correctly.

[SF1900]

I remember Navy Mike had a disabled car tag while posting pictures of himself leg pressing multiple plates. The disabled car tag is what exposed him, I believe.

[MuscleBuff]

I remember Navy Mike had a disabled car tag while posting pictures of himself leg pressing multiple plates. The disabled car tag is what exposed him, I believe.

A lot of disabled people can probably leg press a few plates. For instance mental disabilities like retards

[joswift]

A lot of disabled people can probably leg press a few plates. For instance mental disabilities like retards

Retard strength isnt always the case

Look at Hankins...

[Donny]

I remember Navy Mike had a disabled car tag while posting pictures of himself leg pressing multiple plates. The disabled car tag is what exposed him, I believe.

How far could he walk? Did he have pains walking up or down stairs?
a lot of factors that would have been tested if he got a pension

[NarcissisticDeity]

 

[MuscleBuff]

Retard strength isnt always the case

Look at Hankins...

I once read that retard strength is a myth, linked to the fact retards use too much stength during everyday activity such as shaking hands

[NarcissisticDeity]

 

[FitnessFrenzy]

I didn't know bigbobs was that obsessed with Nasser. There is really no excuse for buying a used Nasser t-shirt. 

[Griffith]

I didn't know bigbobs was that obsessed with Nasser. There is really no excuse for buying a used Nasser t-shirt. 

Deep in schmoe territory.

[robcguns]

Best Getbig quote ever.

[wes]

From Kwon:

 

 

[NaturalWonder83]

I didn't know bigbobs was that obsessed with Nasser. There is really no excuse for buying a used Nasser t-shirt. 

That is passion, not obsession. And it's the same thing as basketball fans purchasing a signed basketball or signed Jordan jersey at a sports memorabilia auction.

[NarcissisticDeity]

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

 

[Taffin]

Re: Misapplication of GB COCK, Code Duello, and Moderator Review Obligations

The Committee™’s invocation of the Get Big Code of Conduct Keystones (GB COCK) and Code Duello is inconsistent with its own precedent.

GB COCK §2.3(b) (rev. March 2025) draws a bright-line distinction between poster-to-poster disputes and competence reviews of authority holders. The latter are expressly excluded from adversarial or performative resolution mechanisms. This principle was reaffirmed in Hankins v. Josh (Committee Findings, May 2024), where the Committee™ held that “no amount of rhetorical victory cures structural incompetence.”

Similarly, the Committee™’s post-mortem on the OneMoreRep v. SuckMyMuscle War (2012–2013) concluded that escalation frameworks are containment tools, not substitutes for judgment—particularly where one party benefits from institutional protection. That finding was later cited in Memorandum 18-02 (January 2018) cautioning against “spectacle-driven avoidance of substantive review.”

The present matter concerns moderator fitness, not interpersonal grievance. Suggesting Code Duello as a remedy is therefore contrary to settled practice.

Further, the Committee™ should be mindful of its own guidance in Advisory Note 20-07 (June 2024) regarding conflicts of interest. That advisory arose in part from concerns that GrapeApe had leveraged Committee™ authority in disputes tangentially involving French Toast-related enforcement, creating at minimum the appearance of personal benefit influencing procedural outcomes. While no formal finding was issued, the Committee™ acknowledged that even perceived self-dealing erodes institutional credibility.

Finally, the Committee™’s attempt to diffuse the issue through humor mirrors its rejected approach in Chaos Review Addendum (August 2015), where the Committee™ acknowledged that physical distractions—including, memorably, Chaos’s cankles—were irrelevant to assessing whether authority was exercised competently.

If the Committee™ has abandoned these standards, it should state so explicitly. Otherwise, continued reliance on deflection constitutes a refusal to apply the GB COCK as written.

[NarcissisticDeity]