I asked you when she lied and told you I had not watched it all
the only lie that you showed was that she lied about writing the letter and as I've pointed out (and I'll gladly look at anything you care to offer) that the content of the letter (to the best of my knowledge) has not been proven to be a lie.
Her friend wrote the letter and Jeantel presumably dictated it to her which is still technically her letter
If you have some info that the content of the letter was false then I will look at it
Was there another lie on the stand that you pointed out?
Again - did the judge instruct the jury to ignore any part of her testimony or charge her with perjury
you must be that guu that nobody can stand being around because you will literally stand there and argue that the sky is orange when it is quite obviously blue, just because you refuse to be wrong and you somehow think if you just keep arguing that getting the last word will somehow make you right.
youre as bad as arguing with a religious fundamentalist. She said the letter was hers, under oath, and then admitted later that she didnt write it and couldnt read it. You would think that if she dictated it, she would still be able to repeat those words to the public.
but whatever man, keep on believing, if you just keep arguing long enough it may just magically become true, and you definitely wont look like an idiot for refusing to accept what is right in front of your face.