Zimmerman just got arrested ?

[tonymctones]

Don't get me wrong... I don't think he's innocent. I think he followed a kid and got punched for it, then turned into a punk bitch and shot the kid, but I admit that it wasn't a crime to follow him.

He did cause the circumstances though.

It's like being an innocent in a war zone... If you're in the war zone, you're probably not completely innocent.

agreed as I have said many times he was an idiot and a shit head, doesnt mean did anything illegal.

doesnt make trayvon any less of a shit head either...

when you get to idiot shitheads together, bad things happen

[RRKore]

250K in debt, homeless, unemployed.... dude has a life that is nonstop sucking.

Prediction time:

He's either gonna get religion in a big way or he'll commit suicide. 

(The "saved by a good woman" possibility just got downgraded to "Aw, hell no!")

[240 is Back]

served divorce papers while in jail.  aw, he had to stay overnight?  sucks.

[Dos Equis]

Prediction time:

He's either gonna get religion in a big way or he'll commit suicide. 

(The "saved by a good woman" possibility just got downgraded to "Aw, hell no!")

Might get taken out by a vigilante, especially after Holder finally admits he has no basis to prosecute him.

[240 is Back]

no way zimmerman is every taken out by a vigilante on the outside.   I could see him getting in trouble in jail, where dudes may be wanting to prove themselves... but on the outside at least, i bet the dude doesn't take a crap without a shotgun by his side.

[tonymctones]

Prediction time:

He's either gonna get religion in a big way or he'll commit suicide. 

(The "saved by a good woman" possibility just got downgraded to "Aw, hell no!")

no "good woman" would get involved with him, lets be honest who here thinks that this gf isnt bat shit crazy as it is?

you would have to be to get involved with him

[Jack T. Cross]

no "good woman" would get involved with him, lets be honest who here thinks that this gf isnt bat shit crazy as it is?

you would have to be to get involved with him

Why?

[tonymctones]

Why?

b/c this guys attracts negative attention at every turn

just look at how many people on here are waiting to jump on any stupid shit he does.

[Jack T. Cross]

b/c this guys attracts negative attention at every turn

just look at how many people on here are waiting to jump on any stupid shit he does.

Do you think he's dangerous?

[Straw Man]

no way zimmerman is every taken out by a vigilante on the outside.   I could see him getting in trouble in jail, where dudes may be wanting to prove themselves... but on the outside at least, i bet the dude doesn't take a crap without a shotgun by his side.

he's not allowed to possess any guns at the present time

now he's going to have to actually learn to fight

[tonymctones]

Do you think he's dangerous?

dont know, definitely a valid question and even more reason why anyone who would involve themselves with him is not the sharpest tool in the shed

[Jack T. Cross]

dont know, definitely a valid question and even more reason why anyone who would involve themselves with him is not the sharpest tool in the shed

Yes, and particularly since he seems to have a problem with using guns in an inappropriate way.

Thanks, Tony.

[tonymctones]

Yes, and particularly since he seems to have a problem with using guns in an inappropriate way.

Thanks, Tony.

I assume youre trying to refer to shooting trayvon, that was a perfectly appropriate way to use a gun...

[Jack T. Cross]

I assume youre trying to refer to shooting trayvon, that was a perfectly appropriate way to use a gun...

We have a person - that even when at home, arguing with his woman - can't help himself from using a gun to exert influence.

[tonymctones]

We have a person - that even when at home, arguing with his woman - can't help himself from using a gun to exert influence.

agreed if thats what you were referring to then yes that is completely inappropriate.

shooting trayvon martin in self defense, completely appropriate.

[Jack T. Cross]

agreed if thats what you were referring to then yes that is completely inappropriate.

shooting trayvon martin in self defense, completely appropriate.

Would using a gun to influence Martin have been appropriate?

[tonymctones]

Would using a gun to influence Martin have been appropriate?

it wouldnt have and if you have ANY SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT HE DID please provide it

[Jack T. Cross]

it wouldnt have and if you have ANY SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT HE DID please provide it

Why not?

[tonymctones]

Why not?

b/c using a gun to coerce someone is an inappropriate use of a gun.....LMFAO do you really need that explained to you?

again IF YOU HAVE ANY SHRED, and I MEAN ANY LITTLE PIECE OF SHRED OF EVIDENCE HE DID THAT TO TRAYVON PLEASE PRESENT IT.

[Jack T. Cross]

b/c using a gun to coerce someone is an inappropriate use of a gun.....LMFAO do you really need that explained to you?

again IF YOU HAVE ANY SHRED, and I MEAN ANY LITTLE PIECE OF SHRED OF EVIDENCE HE DID THAT TO TRAYVON PLEASE PRESENT IT.

What's the threat from doing that?

[Jack T. Cross]

Seems to me there are remarkably few possibilities, each with a potential reward and each with a potential risk.

Will pick this up again tomorrow.

[240 is Back]

I think even the biggest trayvon haters will no longer claim Zimmerman is just a hard-working, heroic dude that keeps getting framed by others while in pursuit of his brave duties.

He's a troublemaker. He's dangerous.  This would be the 5th violent crime arrest for him, plus the lying to the judge...

It's good to see people jumping OFF his bandwagon. 

[Archer77]

I think even the biggest trayvon haters will no longer claim Zimmerman is just a hard-working, heroic dude that keeps getting framed by others while in pursuit of his brave duties.

He's a troublemaker. He's dangerous.  This would be the 5th violent crime arrest for him, plus the lying to the judge...

It's good to see people jumping OFF his bandwagon. 

It's possible to look at the original case and come to the conclusion that there wasn't enough evidence to convict Zimmerman of murder 2 while also acknowledging that zimmerman's recent behavior is atrocious.

[240 is Back]

It's possible to look at the original case and come to the conclusion that there wasn't enough evidence to convict Zimmerman of murder 2 while also acknowledging that zimmerman's recent behavior is atrocious.

IMO, it was the vague law "You can shoot someone to defend yourself - even if you are the aggressor that started the fight".

That's totally the law.  You're allowed to follow someone 2 blocks with a gun - as you admit they're running from you.  You're allowed (not saying this is the case here) - You're ALLOWED to attack the kid - then halfway thru the fight when you decide you wish to exit the fight - you can THEN use your gun in self-defense.   And it's totally legal.

To me, that's just bullshit... just horrible part of the law.  I can walk up to Mike Tyson and punch him in the head, yes, I'll be charged with assault, but then when he starts defending himself, I can claim "I feared for my life" and I can shoot in self-defense.

It's terrible, it really is.  But it's the law, baby!

[tonymctones]

IMO, it was the vague law "You can shoot someone to defend yourself - even if you are the aggressor that started the fight".

That's totally the law.  You're allowed to follow someone 2 blocks with a gun - as you admit they're running from you.  You're allowed (not saying this is the case here) - You're ALLOWED to attack the kid - then halfway thru the fight when you decide you wish to exit the fight - you can THEN use your gun in self-defense.   And it's totally legal.

To me, that's just bullshit... just horrible part of the law.  I can walk up to Mike Tyson and punch him in the head, yes, I'll be charged with assault, but then when he starts defending himself, I can claim "I feared for my life" and I can shoot in self-defense.

It's terrible, it really is.  But it's the law, baby!

And why does that have to do with the Zimmerman trial?

Do you have proof Zimmerman was the aggressor?