Author Topic: The offseason myth  (Read 30798 times)

bigmc

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #25 on: January 06, 2014, 11:23:50 AM »
Test, deca and dbol is excellent and imo still the way to go for a bodybuilder in his first two years of juicing on AAS.

Once you are maxed out size-wise on aas only, it's time to pass on to gh. Once you're there, deca shouldn't be used anymore. EQ and tren take over.

Off season bulk for an aas only bodybuilder is NOT the same as off season bulk for an advanced bodybuilder (+5IU gh ED, slin and high test).

The first will have a much higher BF % then the latter, who will have more water retention and estrogen moosh then actual fat (unless he doesn't know how to use adjust his diet to his slin use, but then he's not advanced imo).

you must be a beast

you posted a pic?
T

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #26 on: January 06, 2014, 11:25:28 AM »
How was your energy level when you got that light?
excellent .. and I am not the "energetic" type on a regular base

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #27 on: January 06, 2014, 11:32:43 AM »
you must be a beast

you posted a pic?

He's from that other site. . You know where the serious bodybuilders post.

He must be huge

bigmc

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #28 on: January 06, 2014, 11:33:26 AM »
He's from that other site. . You know where the serious bodybuilders post.

He must be huge

yeah i know

they are all interchangeable posting the same shit
T

galeniko

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4535
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #29 on: January 06, 2014, 11:38:51 AM »
Interesting. I have read other's thoughts that suggest the best BF range for hormone sensitivity is in the 10-12% range. It is quite difficult for a natty to get down to the 8% level, right?
hellno fuck no lol.

10-12% fat is tooooo fat.

at that fat, an estrogen fiasco-fest is ensured.

8% is kinda easy for a natty.the meltdown happens at much lower bodyfat for natural.8% is "easy"
n

CalvinH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22221
  • Spastic Tarted Cvunt
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #30 on: January 06, 2014, 11:46:33 AM »
excellent .. and I am not the "energetic" type on a regular base


Thanks, I'm dieting myself and was wondering.

galeniko

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4535
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #31 on: January 06, 2014, 11:51:20 AM »
I grew up like all of you with the Flex magazine bullshit and the lies from the videos. Oh well...

The ideea of bulking, then cutting for a show. It never made sense to me but who am I to dispute. I did notice the occasional oddity who grew into a show.

My last transformation I did slim down without drugs, as much as I was able to, then hopped on a stack. Disgusted encouraged me and helped me with pointers. As you all know, when you diet strict you become paranoic and don't think clear  ;D

 The results were much much better. I think I first became aware of this when gh15 said that it is much better to start a cycle at a low bodyfat. And it is.

The stack is different, and I see no point in doing the test, deca and dbol bulking unless you feel the need to be "big" all the time. Your body recovers better if you go off completely and only use when growing into contest shape or close to that. It's also mentally less taxing to not take hormones all the time. For me at least.

Levrone did it this way, Arnold, Lee Haney and I am sure many others.
hm,sev.
i agree and i no agree.

a bloody newcomer must gain some weight first , for us who have had the size before is easy, we can just hop on gear, do the same diet as usual and we end up looking like before very fast.no matter if we fat or thin.

the muscle never realy gone,its just smaller, stores fuck all nutritients etc.layer of fat and boom we look like never lifted a weight in the life.

now lets say if we wanted to add some serious size now, we would need to do a little bulking too, but rather to make the nedded extra drugs work,more than anything else.and ppl confuse bulk with eating whatever at any given time, no restrictions whatsoever.ofc this will not end well.
but a slow weight gain from mostly clean foods would be necesary for us to get bit further.
more imporatnt though, the dosage increase.

this is important, yes dosage has everything to do with size, but this doesnt mean a newcomer can come and blast away.gotta work the way up slowly.

but we do agree, steroids are much better when lean, only ppl who been so lean will know the difference.

and fully agredd, once there, and happy with the size, is better to go off gear for offseaosn instead of "bulking".
better to be off gear and not even train, or train a bit.
bulking is a pathetic excuse use as spacegoat for zero diet discipline.

a proper bulk has its places but it  has nothing to do with permanent glutony as some think.
that bs is reinforced by"you can eat whatever you want on drugs dex jackson was seen eating mcdonslad contest prep"
 
well, thats not true, dex eats a mcdonalds chicken wing but then diets for 1 week again and trains twice a day ,lol.
n

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #32 on: January 06, 2014, 11:53:21 AM »
Layne Norton ..
you lost me right there

galeniko

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4535
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #33 on: January 06, 2014, 11:56:34 AM »
your insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscles is higher at lower body fat levels thus cells  absorb nutrients at a much better rate
and everywhere else, tyhe liver metabolises the foods in an extremly superior way.

youre 5% and eat 5pizzas in a row, you wont gain fat.

youre 10% and eat half that and your face gonna look like a filled bag of soft diarhea.and definite fat gains.

insulin sensitivity is key ,is everything.

if its bad, the body will not use the food properly.it turns a whole metaoblism upside down.

more important than calories this calories that.

if one has mastered the feel of increased insulin senstivity theyre set and ready to go.they will never agin need a dieting plan.

btw insulin sensitivity is increased by,guess what, eating very little food.and working out.that order.

very good post,man.
n

Mawse

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #34 on: January 06, 2014, 11:59:18 AM »
cardio sucks for preservation of muscle mass, sprints are far better and do them in intervals, just take a look at a marathon runner and a sprinter, you'll see the difference ;)


Sprints release Pixie Dust into the blood that magically targets visceral fat and completely bypasses the idea that it's a calorie deficit leads to reduced bodyfat.

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #35 on: January 06, 2014, 12:00:02 PM »

Sprints release Pixie Dust into the blood that magically targets visceral fat and completely bypasses the idea that it's a calorie deficit leads to reduced bodyfat.
:D

this was good

galeniko

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4535
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #36 on: January 06, 2014, 12:00:29 PM »
so what about the need of caloric surplus for muscle growth
what about it.

has it to be permanent?

or will be body grow a bit after eevry meal and become catabolic with every fasting?

permanent caloric surplus, as in eating when not hungry evbery time will plain and simply make ppl gain fat forst and foremost.

the suprlus is needed, but its much less than ppl think imo.

it really depends on so many factors.
n

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71209
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #37 on: January 06, 2014, 12:03:15 PM »
what about it.

has it to be permanent?

or will be body grow a bit after eevry meal and become catabolic with every fasting?

permanent caloric surplus, as in eating when not hungry evbery time will plain and simply make ppl gain fat forst and foremost.

the suprlus is needed, but its much less than ppl think imo.

it really depends on so many factors.

^^^

This is the time where you go by the mirror and adjust calories accordingly.

galeniko

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4535
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #38 on: January 06, 2014, 12:07:38 PM »
Layne Norton is a big proponent of this theory and likes to use the example of the marathon runner and sprinter. It's not necessarily accurate though. Athletes who participate in particular disciplines at a high level usually self-select due to a genetic predisposition. Thus, no matter how Ryan Hall eats, trains, and drugs, he's never going to look like a jacked Olympic sprinter. He's got a light frame and little genetic ability to put on muscle. Marathon running is perfect for him. The reverse is true for many sprinters. They have heavy frames and good genetic ability to put on and retain muscle mass. Add in some PEDs and some will look really jacked. I'm not saying serious marathon training and bodybuilding are compatible, they're not, but the marathon runner/sprinter example is inaccurate and overused. U can do a decent amount of low intensity steady state cardio without losing appreciable muscle mass.  
i tried both kinds of cardio, if id have to give the edge to one, itd be the easy moderate cardio.

but i like doing the more intense, burn cals quicker and less boring.

theyre about the same.

^^^

This is the time where you go by the mirror and adjust calories accordingly.
yeah, or 1 banenana + proetin shake added to the normal diet and see what happens etc.

nothing drastic.or just dcrease the fasting times between meals.

btw,the mirror can be misleading, dep on whats used imo.

this example , after a big meal of cheat one will look leaner than they are, then 1-2 days later, the muscle cells empty and leave the now bit bigger fatcells exposed,and the look is totaly different withing few days.
some then feel flat and want to make up for it with another big meal, this is the biggest error,lol.

if the fat is there it certainly will not go away from a nother cheat meal,lol.

its just the phenomen of full muscle pressing towards the skin.
the bill and payback come next day or the day after that ;D
n

Disgusted

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13610
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #39 on: January 06, 2014, 12:17:39 PM »
One can def built on muscle with zero carbs, not that you can't eat some.

Disgusted

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13610
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #40 on: January 06, 2014, 12:21:10 PM »
Not possible for me unfortunately.

Muscle = lots of carbs but get very fat too.

No carbs = lose lots of fat but lots more possible.

That's the problem and no matter what I do will ever change that equation.

Only thing that can change that is juice or lypo.



Can't tell you how many times I have heard this. You are def doing something wrong.

galeniko

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4535
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #41 on: January 06, 2014, 12:26:28 PM »
Can't tell you how many times I have heard this. You are def doing something wrong.
hes natural und unexperienced :D


long road ahead :D

hapy new year btw 8)
n

Disgusted

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13610
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #42 on: January 06, 2014, 12:28:33 PM »
hes natural und unexperienced :D


long road ahead :D

hapy new year btw 8)

You too brother.  :)

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71209
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #43 on: January 06, 2014, 12:28:44 PM »
i tried both kinds of cardio, if id have to give the edge to one, itd be the easy moderate cardio.

but i like doing the more intense, burn cals quicker and less boring.

theyre about the same.
yeah, or 1 banenana + proetin shake added to the normal diet and see what happens etc.

nothing drastic.or just dcrease the fasting times between meals.

btw,the mirror can be misleading, dep on whats used imo.

this example , after a big meal of cheat one will look leaner than they are, then 1-2 days later, the muscle cells empty and leave the now bit bigger fatcells exposed,and the look is totaly different withing few days.
some then feel flat and want to make up for it with another big meal, this is the biggest error,lol.

if the fat is there it certainly will not go away from a nother cheat meal,lol.

its just the phenomen of full muscle pressing towards the skin.
the bill and payback come next day or the day after that ;D
Very true..totally agree.

bigmc

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #44 on: January 06, 2014, 12:31:27 PM »

I PROMISE you I am not doing anything wrong other than the fact that I am extremely carb sensitive.

I have done experiments.

A calorie does not = a calorie in my body.


For gaining muscle (and I am really good at putting on muscle natty) the most important factor is carbs.

It does not matter if I eat 100g protein or 300g protein, makes zero difference on muscle gain.

If I eat 300g + carbs or more like 500g BOOM = muscle growth.

On the other hand if I eat anything over 70g carb BOOM = Instant fat gain.

I end up either looking anoerexic or like a powerlifter.

With certain bodies like mine there is no winning, its a curse.

If I ever manage to find a photo editor that blanks out my face I will post pics so you understand, my free photoshop trial has expired

disgusted really knows his stuff

try listening too him gal too

if they say you are doing something wrong try exploring that avenue rather than making excuses

this post is meant in a positive way
T

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #45 on: January 06, 2014, 12:32:00 PM »
don't bother Disgusted, I have already offered him advice but he insist with this 500 grams a day of carbs because bla bla bla

no such thing as carb sensitivity by the way .. another dude with fixed ideas

Disgusted

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13610
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #46 on: January 06, 2014, 12:33:53 PM »

I PROMISE you I am not doing anything wrong other than the fact that I am extremely carb sensitive.

I have done experiments.

A calorie does not = a calorie in my body.


For gaining muscle (and I am really good at putting on muscle natty) the most important factor is carbs.

It does not matter if I eat 100g protein or 300g protein, makes zero difference on muscle gain.

If I eat 300g + carbs or more like 500g BOOM = muscle growth.

On the other hand if I eat anything over 70g carb BOOM = Instant fat gain.

I end up either looking anoerexic or like a powerlifter.

With certain bodies like mine there is no winning, its a curse.

If I ever manage to find a photo editor that blanks out my face I will post pics so you understand, my free photoshop trial has expired

OK you say that you are extremely carb sensitive. So I take this to mean that once you increase your carbs to a certain extent you all of the sudden put on muscle? From a physiological stand point this doesn't make sense as an over abundance (in your case) are not needed to build muscle tissue. So something else is obviously going on here. I would like to know what exactly you are eating both ways as far as low to no carb and then with carbs when you say that you grow best.

bigmc

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #47 on: January 06, 2014, 12:38:26 PM »


Listen brother, I am humble, I am here listen from the people who know what they are doing.

I am not making excuses, why you think I want to look garbage for the rest of my life? you think i wouldn't give my right arm to have a body like galienko???

Off course I would.

What you don't understand is if you abused you body for like years and year with junk food, alchol and other shit, your body is not gonna forget and forgive you like that.

Like I said if I posted my transformation pics you would begin to understand.

I AM EXTREMELY CARB SENSITIVE.

Just the way it is, my muscles only grow from carbs but unfortunately the very thing makes my muscle grow makes me fat.



arent you on scripted growth

that can mess your system up

regarding insulin sensitivity etc
T

dustin

  • Guest
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #48 on: January 06, 2014, 12:40:21 PM »
don't bother Disgusted, I have already offered him advice but he insist with this 500 grams a day of carbs because bla bla bla

no such thing as carb sensitivity by the way .. another dude with fixed ideas

When people say they're "carb sensitive" it means that they're fat, unobservant and delusional. They do things wrong, but they do not see it. And they're always perplexed and wonder why things never go as anticipated.

To sum it up, they're clueless fatasses. No offense to anyone here or anything.

Disgusted

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13610
Re: The offseason myth
« Reply #49 on: January 06, 2014, 12:41:28 PM »


Listen brother, I am humble, I am here listen from the people who know what they are doing.

I am not making excuses, why you think I want to look garbage for the rest of my life? you think i wouldn't give my right arm to have a body like galienko???

Off course I would.

What you don't understand is if you abused you body for like years and year with junk food, alchol and other shit, your body is not gonna forget and forgive you like that.

Like I said if I posted my transformation pics you would begin to understand.

I AM EXTREMELY CARB SENSITIVE.

Just the way it is, my muscles only grow from carbs but unfortunately the very thing makes my muscle grow makes me fat.



This can not be true anymore that you could breath under water. A lot of times when people get fat they feel like they are big and or growing more.