Author Topic: Still the ideal after 65 years?...  (Read 20968 times)

Sam

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2943
  • I just shoot the bastards.....Thats my policy!
Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« on: January 17, 2014, 09:54:56 AM »

Skylge

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2835
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2014, 10:29:51 AM »
Vast majority of women will answer that question "yes"....

SmallPole

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 828
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2014, 10:30:46 AM »
Vast majority of women will answer that question "yes"....

you don't know many women, do you?

Bevo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18748
  • Middle Urinal at Buc-ee’s
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2014, 12:08:55 PM »
Vast majority of women will answer that question "yes"....

Fuck that it's all about the men  >:(

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2014, 12:15:47 PM »
is that basile

TrueGrit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15192
  • Big dude...all the way big dude.
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2014, 12:20:11 PM »
O

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2014, 12:29:59 PM »


most overrated bodybuilder of all time

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2014, 12:35:32 PM »
most overrated bodybuilder of all time
I almost agree.... everyone fawns over him but o really see nothing that makes me say 'holy shit' like I do with pics of guys like Arnold, Dorian, or Ronnie.

shawn ray is another one that I kinda dont see the fuss over. Yeah he had decent lines, but he wasnt any more aesthetic than some of the other guys... sometimes I think people see small = aesthetic.

dude was a mass monster on a miniature scale.

lightweightbaby83,

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 32
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2014, 12:51:25 PM »
What you posted is not his best look. The beach shots he took are most definitely the ideal physique.

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #9 on: January 17, 2014, 12:52:42 PM »

The Grim Lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2014, 01:33:56 PM »
I almost agree.... everyone fawns over him but o really see nothing that makes me say 'holy shit' like I do with pics of guys like Arnold, Dorian, or Ronnie.

shawn ray is another one that I kinda dont see the fuss over. Yeah he had decent lines, but he wasnt any more aesthetic than some of the other guys... sometimes I think people see small = aesthetic.

dude was a mass monster on a miniature scale.

True on Shawn but that was compared to the best era ever. Anywhere else he is a god

RagingBull

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #11 on: January 17, 2014, 01:35:45 PM »
Vince looks great! 

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2014, 01:36:37 PM »
In 1949, what other guys looked as good as Reeves?

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2014, 01:37:20 PM »
Let me take Reeves apart a bit: thick ankles and thick knees, long upper body compared to his lower, take the pretty face and the "magik" is gone.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79530
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2014, 01:39:57 PM »
In 1949, what other guys looked as good as Reeves?

Exactly it's all context

Show me another all NATURAL guy who was 6'1" 215lbs with perfect proportions and a 29" waist , there has never been another guy who came close

Guy ate 3 times a day , worked out his entire body at once , no supplements to speak of , next to no real equipment , he developed exercises. Who has done more with less?

The guys structure & proportions are unrivaled.

The Grim Lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2014, 01:41:50 PM »
Exactly it's all context

Show me another all NATURAL guy who was 6'1" 215lbs with perfect proportions and a 29" waist , there has never been another guy who came close

Guy ate 3 times a day , worked out his entire body at once , no supplements to speak of , next to no real equipment , he developed exercises. Who has done more with less?

The guys structure & proportions are unrivaled.

Yes, because he was around before Weider spun his bullshit which is now so commonplace in order to make money.

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #16 on: January 17, 2014, 01:49:29 PM »
Exactly it's all context

Show me another all NATURAL guy who was 6'1" 215lbs with perfect proportions and a 29" waist , there has never been another guy who came close

Guy ate 3 times a day , worked out his entire body at once , no supplements to speak of , next to no real equipment , he developed exercises. Who has done more with less?

The guys structure & proportions are unrivaled.
not natural

a buttfucker (like yourself)

weirdo
(
narcissist ..pun intended

etc etc

C-BuZz

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1351
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #17 on: January 17, 2014, 01:50:03 PM »
Exactly it's all context

Show me another all NATURAL guy who was 6'1" 215lbs with perfect proportions and a 29" waist , there has never been another guy who came close

Guy ate 3 times a day , worked out his entire body at once , no supplements to speak of , next to no real equipment , he developed exercises. Who has done more with less?

The guys structure & proportions are unrivaled.

Natural??? LMAO!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=159355.0

Here is an interview with Sergio where he talked about drug use in the 60's and mentions Steve :

BDJ: Could you relay your own experience with drug use?


SO: This is an area of great interest for people. I don't care who wants to take steroids, because that's a personal choice... that's his life. Now, today, everybody has access to them. I even saw in one of the big magazines that Arnold denies having used them, but Arnold was one of the first to bring steroids over to America. And everybody in the old days used them: Zane, Columbu, myself, Arnold, Larry Scott, Harold Poole, Dave Draper, and even Steve Reeves. There's no way to deny it. It wasn't much, nothing like today. But the development of drugs is much different. I used decca and dianabol, and that was something really big at the time; and decca was not considered that bad. It was even prescribed by doctors to help make your bones strong. Today you have guys weighing 200 pounds, and six months later they weigh 250-300 pounds! So you know these guys are taking something unbelievable. When they say they haven't taken any thing, you know that it's phony.



I don't have access to it but I also read an interview where Harold Poole said that Steve took steroids but mainly relied on B12 injections. I think you misinterpreted that I'm some sought of hater on Steve, I'm not. I loved the guy and he's in my top 10 bodybuilders of all time. I'm just being honest, based on what I've read and heard from fellow bodybuilding fans.

SERGIO!!!!

JamesRustles

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 74
  • Vince Goodrum Fan Club
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #18 on: January 17, 2014, 01:55:13 PM »
Natural??? LMAO!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=159355.0

This

CIBA just started manufacturing dbol around the time of Steeve Reeves and he was their guinea pig

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79530
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #19 on: January 17, 2014, 01:55:55 PM »
not natural

a buttfucker (like yourself)

weirdo
(
narcissist ..pun intended

etc etc

Who told you he wasn't natural? The Aliens?  ::)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79530
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #20 on: January 17, 2014, 01:57:23 PM »
Natural??? LMAO!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=159355.0


Do your research , who cares what Sergio said? That makes him feel better about his own drug use.

Anabolics weren't even produced until years AFTER he retired. Don't go off of hearsay.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79530
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #21 on: January 17, 2014, 01:59:07 PM »
This

CIBA just started manufacturing dbol around the time of Steeve Reeves and he was their guinea pig


Wrong. Ciba started years AFTER he retired. Nice try. Reeves retired in 1950 because he won every major competition there was and moved on to Hollywood.

Do the research.

C-BuZz

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1351
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #22 on: January 17, 2014, 01:59:44 PM »
Do your research , who cares what Sergio said? That makes him feel better about his own drug use.

Anabolics weren't even produced until years AFTER he retired. Don't go off of hearsay.

Dream on son, this is getbig, not bb.com. How do you know exactly when steroids were invented?


doriancutlerman

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #23 on: January 17, 2014, 02:01:34 PM »
Let me take Reeves apart a bit: thick ankles and thick knees, long upper body compared to his lower, take the pretty face and the "magik" is gone.

I think the dude looked very good for his time, but I never understood the whole "oh, he's so handsome" claptrap.  His forehead was a mile high and his brow cast shadows on a pair of rather beady eyes.

He did look better later with facial hair, though, I'll give him that (no homo :D ).

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79530
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Still the ideal after 65 years?...
« Reply #24 on: January 17, 2014, 02:03:36 PM »
Dream on son, this is getbig, not bb.com. How do you know exactly when steroids were invented?



We know for a fact when they were. Do the research and find out yourself