It's less racist because it's not based on race. Stop and frisk , as it is, results in something like 5% arrests, 1% convictions , and 0.05 gun recovery. Stop and frisk doesn't uncover gun crime in significant numbers. It finds drug users, people with warrants, etc most of the time. People of races other than black commit plenty of crimes.There is no reason to assume you are "not likely to find anything".
I guess I just don't understand the logic....
'because they didn't fund guns but they found people with WARRANTS' makes it racist. Theyre targeting the group with the highest likely hood to commit 'x' crime, and they're finding 'y' crime instead. Just because they happening to be targeting 'x' grouo more because of a proclivity to commit the crime doesn't make 'y' crime any less of a crime.
Its not like theyre targeting them unfairly for 'y', they just happen to find it when searching for 'x'.
Nothing racist or discriminatory about it. The idea that 'unless theyre catching both races equally its racist' makes no sense as theyre not targeting them for that crime. Its simply a lottery.
When they start using stop and frisk to search for pot possesion and they're targeting blacks at a 5:1 ratio THEN you have an argument.