Author Topic: Obama is covering for ISIS  (Read 15945 times)

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #25 on: September 05, 2014, 08:16:53 PM »
It's not about what weight you have to give his opinion or those of anyone else.  The whole point of this board is to express opinions.  Some are better than others, but it sounds like you're challenging his "right" to even express an opinion.  Everybody (who isn't a troll) primarily posts opinions on the board.  Nothing wrong with that.  

I'm not challenging his "right" to post - although I don't think anyone has a right to post on here. At best we have the privilege, afforded us by the owner of this board.

But while I'm not challenging his "right" to post I am challenging him and his positions. Asking him why anyone here should care about his opinions is certainly legitimate. Why should we? This is a man whose "opinions" include the idea that a massive conspiracy, spanning at least a decade and involving thousands of people has been perpetrated so that a Kenyan could run for and win the Presidency of the United States against all odds and the Constitution. He persists to hold this opinion after evidence he claims supported it is proven to be false and when overwhelming and extensive evidence against his position was posted by me and others. Some of that evidence is evidence that he, himself, admits are compelling and which he cannot refute, but which he then, promptly, ignores.

He can hold whatever damn opinion he pleases. But when he posts them here, he opens himself up for criticism and, frankly, he should expect to be challenged; he should expect having to support assertions he makes; he should expect to be laughed at and mocked when he espouses obviously stupid and unsupportable positions; he should expect to be called out when his replies to critical questions address nothing and merely consist of copy-pastes of what someone else said or some variation of the, by now infamous, "you don't get it, do you?"

If you don't like that he gets that criticism, I have one thing to say to you: tough. It is after all my opinion, and I have just as much "right" to post it here as he does. Or do you, now, no longer think that this a place where we can post opinions all of a sudden?

James28

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4347
  • toilet roll of peace
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #26 on: September 06, 2014, 03:51:25 PM »
Yeah well, while I can't get into the sympathizers head, seems most if not all indications point to just that. He's admitted he's a Muslim, gave money and supplied arms to terrorists even though he knew what the stood for and what they were labeled as and that's really just the beginning. And just because you don't like Levins voice it still doesn't make him wrong. But of you think otherwise, feel free to debate him.

So what if he is a Muslim? It's not as if your bullshit sky ghosts are any better than their bullshit sky ghosts. Both camps believe in the same load of shit. None is better than the other. And if he is, I'd say your average towelhead could learn from him.
*

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61529
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #27 on: September 06, 2014, 04:01:30 PM »
So what if he is a Muslim? It's not as if your bullshit sky ghosts are any better than their bullshit sky ghosts. Both camps believe in the same load of shit. None is better than the other. And if he is, I'd say your average towelhead could learn from him.

Oh brother. What the fuck can anyone learn from this asshole. Sounds like I hit a nerve. Too fucken bad. It's one thing to be Muslim, it's quite another to be a radical Muslim....that he covering for. You seem to be overlooking that part.

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #28 on: September 06, 2014, 04:33:08 PM »
Oh brother. What the fuck can anyone learn from this asshole. Sounds like I hit a nerve. Too fucken bad. It's one thing to be Muslim, it's quite another to be a radical Muslim....that he covering for. You seem to be overlooking that part.

Well, in order for Obama to be a "radical Muslim" he needs to be a Muslim first. And you've offered no proof that he is. Would you care to try again?

With that out of the way, I'm actually going to be more extreme than you for a second. I have heard the argument that there's a difference between Muslims and "radical Muslims" but I'm really hard pressed to identify differences. I don't doubt that there are people who identify as Muslims that are peaceful and rational - I've worked with some, and have some that I consider friends. But generally, I've found them to be Muslim in name only, and not really religious. It's been my experience that practicing Muslims are, almost invariably, too close to "radical" for my taste. Of course, this is mostly anecdotal evidence derived from a small sample size, but I digress.



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #29 on: September 06, 2014, 06:08:52 PM »
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

ISIS is Obama (Saturbray)
www.braylog.com ^ | 9/6/14 | bray
Posted on September 6, 2014 12:29:46 PM EDT by bray

1 Samuel 5:11 So they called together all the rulers of the Philistines and said, “Send the ark of the god of Israel away; let it go back to its own place, or it will kill us and our people.” For death had filled the city with panic; God’s hand was very heavy on it.

Who is Barak Hussain kidding? He has no interest in stopping ISIS since ISIS is his army and he is rooting for them to defeat the Middle East and America. He and the Democrat party have been rooting for them for the past fifty years as has those journalists who had their heads cut off. Can anybody take serious a morally relative Party which worships the cutting off of babies heads in the birth canal is upset with these barbarians? These animals are cut from the exact same cloth as Hussain, Pelosi and Reid and have supported worse butchers than ISIL.

These two death cults have supported the killing of innocent victims for as long as they both have existed. From the early thirties the Dems have promoted eugenics with their Planned Parenthood saint, Margaret Sanger who openly admired Adolf Hitler and his theories of cleaning the race of its weeds. Most liberals have grown up promoting the killing of blacks and minorities under the guise of babies being an unbearable burden on poor girls justifying the killing of babies until and often after the first breath. What is the moral distance between killing a baby at birth and a journalist with his hands tied? What is the moral difference between killing a baby at birth and anytime after conception? This is the problem with man deciding morality and God. Perhaps that is why Biden said he would meet them at the gates of Hell?

The other kneejerk problem the Party has is their lifelong vilification of Zionists and their sanctification of Palestinians. Their victim status of the Mooselimbs as well as their excusing any savage act by these death cultists makes his first reaction to ally himself with the butcher cutting off an American head. Just as he allowed his Ambassador to be killed by these animals, he feels a brotherhood with the ISIS. This is why he stalls and sputters as well as reading the words of his speeches like a man on death row mouthing his false sympathy for a victim. This community agitator has the coldest heart on the planet like all good Marxists.

After decades of excusing Hamas and the PLO as well as rooting for Al Queda when Bush was President, they have to explain the difference between those poor put upon victims and ISIS. They all have the same goal of killing Jews and Christians so after that what is the difference? When the number one goal of each of these groups as well as much of the Islamic culture, why make a distinction. Not one Islamic leader has found those murders offensive which means they universally agree.

So President Hussain has to explain why Israel is supposed to stand down to their butchers while we bomb ISIS into a manageable dust. Bibi should simply look at him and say, what is good for the goose is good for the gander then go level Gaza.

The only reason Barak is being dragged back into Iraq is because the world is outraged at his brotherhood. He has made an agitator’s dream with chaos reining throughout the oil rich ME. This overeducated idjit believes that Marxism is a superior form of gummit. The problem he does not understand is that Marxism requires a hard dictatorship. Man is not built to submit his sweat and toil to give to another person who may or may not be working as hard.

This requires a gummit built in the style of Stalin that takes goods and services from the producers and turn your efforts to the non-producers. These dictators work in places like Europe and the Middle East which have had kings and some that require dictators, but not in America which is used to freedom.

The reason it works in Middle Eastern communist dictators is that Islam is not a freedom loving religion. As opposed to Christianity which is a choice, Islam is forced on people. The Koran says you will accept Morehamhead by your tongue or a knife at your throat. We are seeing that happen throughout Iraq as we left them to the savages thanks to this President’s need to be the anti-Bush and anti-America so he left them to the mercy of the barbarians. Next we will see the same thing happen in Trashcanistan as we see a Caliphate of terror form. The correct answer was to leave a sizable strike force in Iraq to quell any of these outbreaks to maintain a relative peace and continue to train the Iraqi troops, but that train left the station even though everyone warned him.

Now we have no plan, no clue and no chance of turning things around. This is what happens when you select a leader by how much he hates America, Israel and everything that is decent. This is what a world looks like that is ruled by moral relativism and a bunch of Godless cults. This is the new world order being run by local thugs and bandits terrorizing their people, but enough about the White House. This is exactly where liberalism and new age thinking will take you and those heads being chopped off is just the beginning.

There is one path out of it and it is the one that is being mocked and jeered at by the same people who brought us to this place. That is to turn our hearts and minds to the Lord Jesus Christ and to choose Light over Darkness. We have to choose to follow God’s plan and his morality and turn away from man's and the world's. We have to fight the evil in the world and put those savages in a cage. We as a country have to free ourselves from their oil and treasure and make ourselves self sufficient. We are seeing the tip of their results which is going to be massive killing fields throughout the world. Thank you obama, your army is marching and leaving a trail of blood.

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #30 on: September 06, 2014, 06:22:03 PM »
::)

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #31 on: September 07, 2014, 01:25:56 PM »
Dude that article is a sign of mental illness.

chadstallion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2854
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #32 on: September 07, 2014, 02:22:59 PM »
And we give a shit about your personal beliefs why? Get back to us when you have evidence - preferably concrete, but we'll settle for less. If everything you allege and believe is true, you should have no problem getting it. Get on with this Joe. We're waiting!


I agree with some of what Mark Levin says. In fact, I used to think he was pretty brilliant; sadly after he became a radio-show talk host, he took a turn for the worst and he won't take his foot off the accelerator. It's not just his penchant for saying sensational and silly things to get his listeners and readers riled up (after all, angry and riled up listeners buy books and t-shirts!). No, it's his fucking voice that's the problem... I get a headache just thinking about that annoying shriek. FUCK.


its a great drinking game with ML. take a drink every time he raises his voice to a scream. you'll be drunk in 5 minutes.
w

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #33 on: September 07, 2014, 03:31:41 PM »
It's not about what weight you have to give his opinion or those of anyone else.  The whole point of this board is to express opinions.  Some are better than others, but it sounds like you're challenging his "right" to even express an opinion.  Everybody (who isn't a troll) primarily posts opinions on the board.  Nothing wrong with that. 


If you dont want your opinions challenged by others or in this case facts dont fucking post them.


whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #34 on: September 07, 2014, 03:36:34 PM »
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

ISIS is Obama (Saturbray)
www.braylog.com ^ | 9/6/14 | bray
Posted on September 6, 2014 12:29:46 PM EDT by bray

1 Samuel 5:11 So they called together all the rulers of the Philistines and said, “Send the ark of the god of Israel away; let it go back to its own place, or it will kill us and our people.” For death had filled the city with panic; God’s hand was very heavy on it.

Who is Barak Hussain kidding? He has no interest in stopping ISIS since ISIS is his army and he is rooting for them to defeat the Middle East and America. He and the Democrat party have been rooting for them for the past fifty years as has those journalists who had their heads cut off. Can anybody take serious a morally relative Party which worships the cutting off of babies heads in the birth canal is upset with these barbarians? These animals are cut from the exact same cloth as Hussain, Pelosi and Reid and have supported worse butchers than ISIL.

These two death cults have supported the killing of innocent victims for as long as they both have existed. From the early thirties the Dems have promoted eugenics with their Planned Parenthood saint, Margaret Sanger who openly admired Adolf Hitler and his theories of cleaning the race of its weeds. Most liberals have grown up promoting the killing of blacks and minorities under the guise of babies being an unbearable burden on poor girls justifying the killing of babies until and often after the first breath. What is the moral distance between killing a baby at birth and a journalist with his hands tied? What is the moral difference between killing a baby at birth and anytime after conception? This is the problem with man deciding morality and God. Perhaps that is why Biden said he would meet them at the gates of Hell?

The other kneejerk problem the Party has is their lifelong vilification of Zionists and their sanctification of Palestinians. Their victim status of the Mooselimbs as well as their excusing any savage act by these death cultists makes his first reaction to ally himself with the butcher cutting off an American head. Just as he allowed his Ambassador to be killed by these animals, he feels a brotherhood with the ISIS. This is why he stalls and sputters as well as reading the words of his speeches like a man on death row mouthing his false sympathy for a victim. This community agitator has the coldest heart on the planet like all good Marxists.

After decades of excusing Hamas and the PLO as well as rooting for Al Queda when Bush was President, they have to explain the difference between those poor put upon victims and ISIS. They all have the same goal of killing Jews and Christians so after that what is the difference? When the number one goal of each of these groups as well as much of the Islamic culture, why make a distinction. Not one Islamic leader has found those murders offensive which means they universally agree.

So President Hussain has to explain why Israel is supposed to stand down to their butchers while we bomb ISIS into a manageable dust. Bibi should simply look at him and say, what is good for the goose is good for the gander then go level Gaza.

The only reason Barak is being dragged back into Iraq is because the world is outraged at his brotherhood. He has made an agitator’s dream with chaos reining throughout the oil rich ME. This overeducated idjit believes that Marxism is a superior form of gummit. The problem he does not understand is that Marxism requires a hard dictatorship. Man is not built to submit his sweat and toil to give to another person who may or may not be working as hard.

This requires a gummit built in the style of Stalin that takes goods and services from the producers and turn your efforts to the non-producers. These dictators work in places like Europe and the Middle East which have had kings and some that require dictators, but not in America which is used to freedom.

The reason it works in Middle Eastern communist dictators is that Islam is not a freedom loving religion. As opposed to Christianity which is a choice, Islam is forced on people. The Koran says you will accept Morehamhead by your tongue or a knife at your throat. We are seeing that happen throughout Iraq as we left them to the savages thanks to this President’s need to be the anti-Bush and anti-America so he left them to the mercy of the barbarians. Next we will see the same thing happen in Trashcanistan as we see a Caliphate of terror form. The correct answer was to leave a sizable strike force in Iraq to quell any of these outbreaks to maintain a relative peace and continue to train the Iraqi troops, but that train left the station even though everyone warned him.

Now we have no plan, no clue and no chance of turning things around. This is what happens when you select a leader by how much he hates America, Israel and everything that is decent. This is what a world looks like that is ruled by moral relativism and a bunch of Godless cults. This is the new world order being run by local thugs and bandits terrorizing their people, but enough about the White House. This is exactly where liberalism and new age thinking will take you and those heads being chopped off is just the beginning.

There is one path out of it and it is the one that is being mocked and jeered at by the same people who brought us to this place. That is to turn our hearts and minds to the Lord Jesus Christ and to choose Light over Darkness. We have to choose to follow God’s plan and his morality and turn away from man's and the world's. We have to fight the evil in the world and put those savages in a cage. We as a country have to free ourselves from their oil and treasure and make ourselves self sufficient. We are seeing the tip of their results which is going to be massive killing fields throughout the world. Thank you obama, your army is marching and leaving a trail of blood.

 :o

James28

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4347
  • toilet roll of peace
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #35 on: September 08, 2014, 01:19:36 AM »
Oh brother. What the fuck can anyone learn from this asshole. Sounds like I hit a nerve. Too fucken bad. It's one thing to be Muslim, it's quite another to be a radical Muslim....that he covering for. You seem to be overlooking that part.

You hit a nerve  :D

My friend, I couldn't be paid $5 to pretend to care if America sinks under the seas tomorrow. Obama with it. I'd feel bad for the decent people but I'd wake up tomorrow pining for my coffee, make my oats with cinnamon and syrup and continue with me life as nothing interesting happened, because nothing did.

So calm your concerns, no nerve was struck. And you still have no concrete evidence, merely speculation from sources that's so laughable it SHOULD be posted, for a good laugh.
*

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66389
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #36 on: September 08, 2014, 04:37:48 PM »
I'm not challenging his "right" to post - although I don't think anyone has a right to post on here. At best we have the privilege, afforded us by the owner of this board.

But while I'm not challenging his "right" to post I am challenging him and his positions. Asking him why anyone here should care about his opinions is certainly legitimate. Why should we? This is a man whose "opinions" include the idea that a massive conspiracy, spanning at least a decade and involving thousands of people has been perpetrated so that a Kenyan could run for and win the Presidency of the United States against all odds and the Constitution. He persists to hold this opinion after evidence he claims supported it is proven to be false and when overwhelming and extensive evidence against his position was posted by me and others. Some of that evidence is evidence that he, himself, admits are compelling and which he cannot refute, but which he then, promptly, ignores.

He can hold whatever damn opinion he pleases. But when he posts them here, he opens himself up for criticism and, frankly, he should expect to be challenged; he should expect having to support assertions he makes; he should expect to be laughed at and mocked when he espouses obviously stupid and unsupportable positions; he should expect to be called out when his replies to critical questions address nothing and merely consist of copy-pastes of what someone else said or some variation of the, by now infamous, "you don't get it, do you?"

If you don't like that he gets that criticism, I have one thing to say to you: tough. It is after all my opinion, and I have just as much "right" to post it here as he does. Or do you, now, no longer think that this a place where we can post opinions all of a sudden?

No one has a right to post here, which is why I put the word in quotation marks. 

We're pretty much saying the same thing.  I was only pointing out how you were challenging him for even expressing an opinion, rather than the substance of his opinion. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66389
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #37 on: September 08, 2014, 04:38:46 PM »

If you dont want your opinions challenged by others or in this case facts dont fucking post them.



What the heck are you talking about? 

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #38 on: September 08, 2014, 07:17:36 PM »
No one has a right to post here, which is why I put the word in quotation marks. 

We're pretty much saying the same thing.  I was only pointing out how you were challenging him for even expressing an opinion, rather than the substance of his opinion. 

He's holding - if you can use that word - a meritless, unsubstantiated opinion that he cannot articulate nor defend. Am I challenging him for posting it? You bet. I think that people who post bullshit should be challenged.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66389
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #39 on: September 08, 2014, 08:05:16 PM »
He's holding - if you can use that word - a meritless, unsubstantiated opinion that he cannot articulate nor defend. Am I challenging him for posting it? You bet. I think that people who post bullshit should be challenged.

Nothing wrong with that. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #41 on: September 09, 2014, 06:09:29 AM »

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #42 on: September 09, 2014, 06:48:22 AM »
The White House liar getting owned.

Of course the jokeinthewhitehouse referred to ISIS when he called them "JV".


dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #43 on: September 09, 2014, 07:00:13 AM »

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #44 on: September 09, 2014, 07:07:05 AM »

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #45 on: September 09, 2014, 07:56:35 AM »
The White House liar getting owned.

Of course the jokeinthewhitehouse referred to ISIS when he called them "JV".



Jesus, you guys will go with anything. the guy questioning sounds like a retard. Listen to the fucking quote.

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #46 on: September 09, 2014, 08:04:13 AM »
Jesus, you guys will go with anything. the guy questioning sounds like a retard. Listen to the fucking quote.

Hey, moron. The idiotinthewhitehouse's ORIGINAL interview was reviewed again and again. And the reporter asking the question, asked your idol about an incident that involved ISIS. Major newspapers have called this a lie by the White House.

Your messiah was talking about ISIS when he called them JV. PERIOD.

Move on, troll.

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #47 on: September 09, 2014, 08:37:42 AM »
What does the NY TIMES say about that JV comment?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/09/us/politics/a-president-whose-assurances-have-come-back-to-haunt-him.html?_r=0#

But the transcript of the New Yorker interview showed that Mr. Obama made his JV team comment directly after being asked about terrorists in Iraq, Syria and Africa, which would include ISIS. After Mr. Obama’s initial answer, Mr. Remnick pointed out that “that JV team just took over Fallujah,” a city in western Iraq seized by ISIS. Mr. Obama replied that terrorism in many places around the world was not necessarily “a direct threat to us or something that we have to wade into.

Journalistic organizations like PolitiFact, Factcheck.org and The Washington Post’s Fact Checker all rejected the contention that Mr. Obama was not referring to ISIS when he made his comment about JV teams.


Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9902
Re: Obama is covering for ISIS
« Reply #49 on: September 09, 2014, 12:53:14 PM »
What does the NY TIMES say about that JV comment?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/09/us/politics/a-president-whose-assurances-have-come-back-to-haunt-him.html?_r=0#

But the transcript of the New Yorker interview showed that Mr. Obama made his JV team comment directly after being asked about terrorists in Iraq, Syria and Africa, which would include ISIS. After Mr. Obama’s initial answer, Mr. Remnick pointed out that “that JV team just took over Fallujah,” a city in western Iraq seized by ISIS. Mr. Obama replied that terrorism in many places around the world was not necessarily “a direct threat to us or something that we have to wade into.

Journalistic organizations like PolitiFact, Factcheck.org and The Washington Post’s Fact Checker all rejected the contention that Mr. Obama was not referring to ISIS when he made his comment about JV teams.

Again, you are wrong, learn how to read.