To receive 90% of your check, don't you have to be REALLY disabled?

Im assuming the more severe the disability, the greater your disability check is. No?
You would think... The problem is that much like "white guilt" there is an outpouring of "understanding" for disabled vets.
As my above post says - I am most definitely military minded and when a soldier - sailor - airman or Marine is wounded in the combat I think that we OWE it to them to take care.
However - when it becomes whored out - it lessens the meaning and it turns people off. When they see a guy that god forbid was "on the front line" (which can mean a shit load of things) and he worked in Admin, but came home with horrible PTSD - wtf do you expect people to say. I will leave myself out of the discussion but both my father and grandfather are legitimate war heros. Both were wounded multiple times and we look at their Purple Hearts with a sense of pride. Were they "scarred" - I guess fucking so. My grandfather was Skipper of a destroyer and was under attack from kamakazi on 6 separate occasions. He lost his junior officer in one attack and was torn by shrapnel in another. Know how he dealt with it?? He drove the mother fucking boat like he was supposed to and ordered his gunners to clip the wings from incoming sneaky ass Japanese. He has written quite a bit on how the Japanese pilots weren't NEARLY as brave as they were portrayed. MOST lost their will just before the moment of reckoning and fell harmlessly into the sea..
Anyway - I digress - point is that war is SUPPOSED to fucking suck and hearing these stories is SUPPOSED to make us fear war and avoid it...
Legitimate disability should be handled but making men wards of the state when they could be productive is simply enslaving them. Exactly how the Democrat party has enslaved minorities - although more and more you are hearing from minorities that are sick of that shit and they are growing stronger in numbers.