Author Topic: No legs=not a bodybuilder  (Read 11313 times)

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #25 on: October 21, 2014, 12:23:41 PM »
Zits on your thighs too?! U sure you're not doing something wrong?
i've had acne on my legs for like a decade

way before steronz


my theory was also that acne indicates that area is anabolizing


thats why when natural i only had it on my quads and i was a T-rex


i have a lot of theories

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #26 on: October 21, 2014, 02:28:49 PM »

gracie bjj

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7101
  • Getbig!
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #27 on: October 21, 2014, 02:30:59 PM »
345lbs  :'(
But that was about half a year ago, I never do 1 rep max, only tried it once.
I usually stick to 10 - 20 reps (depending if I'm dieting or not) with 225lbs. and then i'll go up to 315lbs and do 5 or 6 reps of that, then back down to 275, 245, 225, 135.
I seem to do better with higher reps, but I keep that 315 5 - 6 rep set in there just in case  :P

some of my best workouts where with 225 higher reps, man i worked out with a guy who competed in nats and he tortured me one leg day with 225lb high rep squats n i was a believer that day. he asked me how much u usually squat with,i said 315 for sets of 10 nice n deep rock bottom squats,if i did the ole cheating way alot of guys do them i could prolly do 405,u know the halfway down,not breaking parrallel crap. he smiled n said we only need 225 at most n i said to myself this aint gonna be that hard,man did i learn a valuable lesson and to this day i still try to do that workout  alot of times, he saw me throwing up outside and said good job and smiled and said now u know the meaning of real leg training and patted me on the back
R

the trainer

  • Guest
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #28 on: October 21, 2014, 02:41:31 PM »
only thing i do for quads is 4 sets of hack squat machine once a week

i dont want them to get too big

Very disappointed in you halo your legs look skinny get under the squat rack.   >:(

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #29 on: October 21, 2014, 03:58:53 PM »
Legs and back are all that matters , everything else is just show.

deceiver

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2666
  • onetimehard appreciation team
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #30 on: October 21, 2014, 04:01:19 PM »
lol, like that has anything to do with legs size.

Unless you are on tons of drugs... Yes it has. Back before insulin era people with best quads had best squat. Remember Tom Platz?

Women like arms and chest. You think a women is going to say, "wow, your gastrocnemius  is quite impressive?"  ::) :D :D

Yes, I do and I heard women saying something along these lines.

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29903
  • Expunged
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #31 on: October 21, 2014, 04:20:19 PM »
Halo you look good but you have the worst skin I've seen.

Even the legs are breaking out.

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12141
  • Getbig!
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #32 on: October 21, 2014, 04:22:20 PM »
Dennis Wolf won the Arnold Classic with the worst thigh to calf ratio in human history



There goes your bodybuilding theory.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #33 on: October 21, 2014, 04:30:22 PM »
My legs  (more than my abs,chest ,arms) where the money maker in my stripper days .


So beautiful



O.Z.

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1440
  • Team Swimmers
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #34 on: October 21, 2014, 04:31:56 PM »
My legs  (more than my abs,chest ,arms) where the money maker in my stripper days .


So beautiful




Were you stripping for younger or older gents?

Lustral

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5164
  • FREE NOODLES
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #35 on: October 21, 2014, 04:32:46 PM »
Quads and hams grow from fuck all. I believe thighs are part genetic (obv) but also show hard work more than any other bodypart. Calves are genetic - moreso than any other bodypart. Starting to come along now but I have gone from 2x per week to 3-4x per week which is serious workload.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #36 on: October 21, 2014, 04:34:40 PM »
Were you stripping for younger or older gents?
Older gents is where the money's at .

_aj_

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17641
  • The Return of the OG
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #37 on: October 21, 2014, 04:36:03 PM »
Quads and hams grow from fuck all. I believe thighs are part genetic (obv) but also show hard work more than any other bodypart. Calves are genetic - moreso than any other bodypart. Starting to come along now but I have gone from 2x per week to 3-4x per week which is serious workload.

I tried a t-nation (no homo) workout for calves. 100 reps of calf raises with a 25 on each hand. In a row. Every day for a month. It hurt and sucked, but I did it. And damned if my fucking calves didn't grow 1/2" in a month.

The first three days, I couldn't walk.

DanielPaul

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2237
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #38 on: October 21, 2014, 04:42:48 PM »
My legs  (more than my abs,chest ,arms) where the money maker in my stripper days .


So beautiful



nice shorts queer boy

O.Z.

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1440
  • Team Swimmers
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #39 on: October 21, 2014, 04:43:51 PM »
nice shorts queer boy


it is shopped, there is no shorts. Beautiful legs though.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #40 on: October 21, 2014, 04:49:44 PM »

Lustral

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5164
  • FREE NOODLES
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #41 on: October 21, 2014, 04:58:04 PM »
I tried a t-nation (no homo) workout for calves. 100 reps of calf raises with a 25 on each hand. In a row. Every day for a month. It hurt and sucked, but I did it. And damned if my fucking calves didn't grow 1/2" in a month.

The first three days, I couldn't walk.

I remember Johnnie Jackson saying he would do same thing...

Funny thing is if I don't train them for three or four days can notice loss in size (and vascularity) so that is prob temp swelling.

WannaBePro

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2190
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #42 on: October 21, 2014, 05:05:38 PM »
some of my best workouts where with 225 higher reps, man i worked out with a guy who competed in nats and he tortured me one leg day with 225lb high rep squats n i was a believer that day. he asked me how much u usually squat with,i said 315 for sets of 10 nice n deep rock bottom squats,if i did the ole cheating way alot of guys do them i could prolly do 405,u know the halfway down,not breaking parrallel crap. he smiled n said we only need 225 at most n i said to myself this aint gonna be that hard,man did i learn a valuable lesson and to this day i still try to do that workout  alot of times, he saw me throwing up outside and said good job and smiled and said now u know the meaning of real leg training and patted me on the back

I recently switched to high reps lower weight. I never used to do 20 reps with 225, i saved my energy for the 315 (still a2g with good form, I don't consider it a squat if it doesn't break parallel). But nowadays I can only do maybe 15 reps max with 225 cause I'm down in weight and the carbs are low  :'( So I just hang around 225 and do that for as much as I can, then drop down to 135 and rep out until I can't squat back up with it. I mean, I see the difference in my legs, more cuts, fuller muscle post-workout, but I also attribute that to getting leaner.

gracie bjj

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7101
  • Getbig!
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #43 on: October 21, 2014, 05:30:34 PM »
I recently switched to high reps lower weight. I never used to do 20 reps with 225, i saved my energy for the 315 (still a2g with good form, I don't consider it a squat if it doesn't break parallel). But nowadays I can only do maybe 15 reps max with 225 cause I'm down in weight and the carbs are low  :'( So I just hang around 225 and do that for as much as I can, then drop down to 135 and rep out until I can't squat back up with it. I mean, I see the difference in my legs, more cuts, fuller muscle post-workout, but I also attribute that to getting leaner.

I HEAR U MAN,WHEN I WAS ON LOW CARBS I WAS LUCKY TO GET 10 REPS WITH 225 ON SQUAT,I WAS LUCKY JUST TO GET TO THE GYM CAUSE MY ENERGY WAS SO LOW,LOW CARB TIMES I RELY MORE ON LEG PRESS AND LUNGES CAUSE IM SO TIRED, I ALREADY LOST MY BALANCE SQUATTING FROM NO ENERGY AND LUCKILY I DIDNT GET HURT.I WAS DOING ZERO CARBS AND ON MY 4TH DAY
R

EastCoastChick

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 305
  • How the f%@k do you post personal pics?
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #44 on: October 21, 2014, 05:30:38 PM »
Women like arms and chest. You think a women is going to say, "wow, your gastrocnemius  is quite impressive?"  ::) :D :D

Can't speak for all women but I love well developed calves. Quite sexy.
7

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #45 on: October 21, 2014, 05:32:53 PM »
My legs  (more than my abs,chest ,arms) where the money maker in my stripper days .


So beautiful




Che has leg shape and genetics like I have arms...gifted.

EastCoastChick

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 305
  • How the f%@k do you post personal pics?
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #46 on: October 21, 2014, 05:34:03 PM »
this is what women want; tall lean toned handsome face and preferably a fat wallet. Requires just a bit of training and luck in the genetics department.



Sorry, this "man" looks like he's still in puberty. Most women like the look of men, not teen boys. If thats you in your avi, your look is preferable to this dude you posted.
7

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18124
  • Getbig!
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #47 on: October 21, 2014, 05:34:15 PM »
some of my best workouts where with 225 higher reps, man i worked out with a guy who competed in nats and he tortured me one leg day with 225lb high rep squats n i was a believer that day. he asked me how much u usually squat with,i said 315 for sets of 10 nice n deep rock bottom squats,if i did the ole cheating way alot of guys do them i could prolly do 405,u know the halfway down,not breaking parrallel crap. he smiled n said we only need 225 at most n i said to myself this aint gonna be that hard,man did i learn a valuable lesson and to this day i still try to do that workout  alot of times, he saw me throwing up outside and said good job and smiled and said now u know the meaning of real leg training and patted me on the back

QFT, I remember Chris Dickerson in his prime during the 80's say he never goes over 225lbs when he squats. Hell,  Wilf Sylvester won the light weight Universe doing nothing but 400 body weight squats with leg extensions and leg curls. The squat racks in bodybuilding gyms are normally used for curls. If they are used everyone puts 405 on the bar and does little shallow dips grunting like they are really doing some work. I think if you do squat it should be like an Olympic lifter. Fairly narrow stance and sinking it as far as you can go keeping fairly upright.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #48 on: October 21, 2014, 05:34:51 PM »
Che has leg shape and genetics like I have arms...gifted.

Thank you Gigantic Event.

gracie bjj

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7101
  • Getbig!
Re: No legs=not a bodybuilder
« Reply #49 on: October 21, 2014, 05:35:06 PM »
My legs  (more than my abs,chest ,arms) where the money maker in my stripper days .


So beautiful


SOLID LEGS,THERE SHAPE IS IMPRESSIVE MORE THAN ANYTHING



R