DNA Discoverer: Blacks Less Intelligent Than Whites

[thegamechanger]

if we really cared about intelligence we wouldnt spend our time lifting weights, looking at random pictures or discuss ronnie coleman vs dorian yates.

[Natural Man]

Well most people replying in this thread agree less intelligent people are more happy. Look at all the responses. Yes, there are exceptions for everything but in general that seems to be the case. Animals are not unhappy as long as they have food / comfort and able to survive. Intelligent humans on the other hand could have all these things and still be unhappy.

intelligent people know mankind is doomed ultimately, that it's just an animal specie that at one point wont be able to cope, adapt anymore or will destroy itself. Of course the average joe doesnt have a clue, he s too busy trying to survive daily. Only when he looses his job and wife leaves with kids does he start to reflect about the absurdity of life.

Also the only point of being intelligent is to fuck other people who are less intelligent.

[Erik C]

Well most people replying in this thread agree less intelligent people are more happy. Look at all the responses. Yes, there are exceptions for everything but in general that seems to be the case. Animals are not unhappy as long as they have food / comfort and able to survive. Intelligent humans on the other hand could have all these things and still be unhappy.

No, only the stupid have everything they need to survive and are unhappy. Look at all the unhappy, angry, malcontent, down right ungrateful, welfare bums, who's basic needs are provided for by a "caring" society.

[Rhino]

intelligent people know mankind is doomed ultimately, that it's just an animal specie that at one point wont be able to cope, adapt anymore or will destroy itself. Of course the average joe doesnt have a clue, he s too busy trying to survive daily. Only when he looses his job and wife leaves with kids does he start to reflect about the absurdity of life.

Also the only point of being intelligent is to fuck other people who are less intelligent.

Yeah, kind of lot of gettbigers. Pushing 40 and looking back on their life.  It's a cruel world out there.

[thegamechanger]

japan has among the highest iq rates in the world and suicide for men 20-44 is the leading cause of death.

[Melkor]

Would Rose dismiss my claim that blacks are more genetically superior in the 100 meter dash? Would you SF1900? Is there a white man that can run faster than Usain Bolt? Is it because of his cultural background that USAIN is faster than any white man? Or because of his genetics?

Is a cheetah faster than a lion because of genetics or is there another reason? Does genetics not exist?

A cheetah is an entirely different species to a lion, of course genetics plays a part here. Its like saying does a bird fly instead of swim because of genetics. OF course it does!

However the issue of intelligence between Africans and other ethnic groups is entirely different. Firstly, we are all variations of the same species. One could make the argument of splitting the human species into distinct sub-species but that is not the point. There is no "gene" or group of "genes" that determines intelligence. Intelligence is a product of genetics in combination with specific rearing and learning behaviours and cultural background.

It is very difficult to develop a deep understanding of quantum mechanics when you don't have access to clean water or food and are suffering from malaria or are in the middle of a bloody civil war or a drought. Have some common sense.

[Erik C]

japan has among the highest iq rates in the world and suicide for men 20-44 is the leading cause of death.

I'm calling BS on that. One, Japan doesn't have the highest IQs in the world. and two, suicide isn't the leading cause of death for Japanese men between the ages of 22-44.

[Viking11]

You have 50% Banana DNA - are you going to tell me you have 0% Banana DNA?

http://www.nhm.ac.uk/nature-online/evolution/what-is-the-evidence/morphology/dna-molecules/

The genes of organisms that look very different are surprisingly similar. For example, human DNA sequences are over 95% identical to chimpanzee sequences and around 50% identical to banana sequences.
You have to go back in time a long way to find a common ancestor between humans and bananas, but ultimately they have both emerged from the same family tree, the tree of life, and that is why they share common characteristics.

Those are two different things and you know it.

[thegamechanger]

I'm calling BS on that. One, Japan doesn't have the highest IQs in the world. and two, suicide isn't the leading cause of death for Japanese men between the ages of 22-44.

among the highest. google them both.

[_bruce_]

I read somewhere that the people in northern regions had to adapt quickly to a very harsh climate which raised their "IQ"s. Looking at northern and southern countries - they are usually miles apart in terms of living quality and crime - illegals/criminal imports aside.

Africa is way behind the curve, not all of it(some regions seem prosperous), but as a whole it can't compare. China will drain it of all its goods - the yellow fever will be worse than Ebola.

[Erik C]

among the highest. google them both.

That invalidates your original post.

[Melkor]

It will be unlikely that we will ever know if Africans could have been as socially and economically advanced as Europeans, with all else being equal.

The facts are however that geographical and ecological conditions were the factors that allowed Europeans (and Eastern Asians to a large extent) to become more rapidly advanced in their technologies, cultures and societies all of which contributed significantly to an increase in "intelligence" as we typically define it in the Western world.

[obsidian]

It is very difficult to develop a deep understanding of quantum mechanics when you don't have access to clean water or food and are suffering from malaria or are in the middle of a bloody civil war or a drought. Have some common sense.

If they can't figure out how to get clean water or food they will never get to quantum mechanics period. You agree with me it is a matter of genetics. Yes, all the human races are part of the same species however each race has evolved over thousands of years with separate traits and attributes. To think otherwise is just plain naive. That's why you can't really expect blacks on average to function properly in a Caucasian society because there is a genetic difference. There are exceptions of course as always but on average no, sorry.

[obsidian]

Those are two different things and you know it.

You said you have zero % Jew DNA yet you have 50% banana DNA? Its not different - DNA is DNA. At the very least you have 99.999% the same DNA as any Pseudo or Real Jew on this planet.

[obsidian]

It will be unlikely that we will ever know if Africans could have been as socially and economically advanced as Europeans, with all else being equal.

The facts are however that geographical and ecological conditions were the factors that allowed Europeans (and Eastern Asians to a large extent) to become more rapidly advanced in their technologies, cultures and societies all of which contributed significantly to an increase in "intelligence" as we typically define it in the Western world.

Correct. The races developed as a function of their environment. Their genetics adapted to the surroundings. Evolution. Many predominant races on the planet are on different evolutionary paths and they are separated by tens of thousands of years. To think that this difference can just be wiped out in 100 years and we can all live happy together is moronic. So either one race yields and goes extinct or the races merge in one mongrel race. In both cases the result is less diversity.

[The True Adonis]

Correct. The races developed as a function of their environment. Their genetics adapted to the surroundings. Evolution. Many predominant races on the planet are on different evolutionary paths and they are separated by tens of thousands of years. To think that this difference can just be wiped out in 100 years and we can all live happy together is moronic. So either one race yields and goes extinct or the races merge in one mongrel race. In both cases the result is less diversity.

You are the moron who thinks humans were bred and alleles were selected for in less than 100 years which is an impossibility.


You are also not on the most intelligent list as your genetics dictate.  I feel sorry for you as a fellow human.

[obsidian]

You are the moron who thinks humans were bred and alleles were selected for in less than 100 years which is an impossibility.

You are also not on the most intelligent list as your genetics dictate.  I feel sorry for you as a fellow human.

Who says it was less than 100 years? And I have said before it was not literal breeding as you with your pea brain interpreted it. Only the strongest slaves survived and had children with other strong slaves that survived. It was not a natural selection process as would have occurred in Africa.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3290787/

African Americans (AfA) are residents of the United States with partial recent Sub-Saharan African ancestry. The majority of them are descendents of the Africans, probably 500,000 to 650,000 in number, who were forcibly brought to North America during the Middle Passage (Thomas 1999; Zakharia et al. 2009). However, many of those captive Africans died either during the Atlantic shipment to America due to the severe conditions, or soon upon their arrival in the New World as a result of exposure to foreign pathogens and/or the poor living conditions. Although the exact amount of life lost in this process remains a mystery, it may equal or exceed the actual amount enslaved (Stannard 1993). Therefore, the high mortality of AfA in the whole slavery era could be attributed to the overwhelming environmental challenges. These persistent selection pressures might make the frequencies of “beneficial” alleles increase continually, which should lead to higher population differentiation between African components of ancestry in AfA and indigenous Africans at these loci, in contrast to those evolved neutrally.

Meanwhile, before Africans and Europeans migrated to the New World, their ancestral parental populations had evolved independently in distinct environments for tens of thousands of years (Basu et al. 2008). The completely new environment in the New World constituted a challenge for both populations and the populations of their admixture. Therefore, it is very likely that some genomic regions in AfA show an excess of a particular ancestry as a result of selection pressures after the population admixture (Tang et al. 2007; Basu et al. 2008). For example, there are various studies in detecting signatures of selection in AfA by examining admixture proportion using a small number of available loci (Workman et al. 1963; Reed 1969; Blumberg and Hesser 1971; Adams and Ward 1973; Long 1991). Recently, Bryc et al. (2010) identified three autosomal regions showing excessive or reduced African ancestry (by at least three standard deviations [SD] of the mean) as natural selection candidates based on ∼500K SNPs genotyped in 365 AfA.

[Viking11]

You said you have zero % Jew DNA yet you have 50% banana DNA? Its not different - DNA is DNA. At the very least you have 99.999% the same DNA as any Pseudo or Real Jew on this planet.

That isn't what I said. I said my DNA tests show 0% Jewish. You brought up the absurd banana thing.  Basically  all life has certain things in common.  I do have 3.2% Neanderthal though. 86% Scandinavian, 8% Irish/English, 6% Subsaharan African.  No Jewish, No Asian, No Indian.