Eric made the claim that use of government email is a protected speech. We were specifically looking at evidence of illegal activity in the other thread (the emails). I thought it was a joke, this first amendment defence but I don't know if it's so clear in this case...
You could argue that these students did not substantially disrupt activity at the school and therefore the censorship would be unjustified.
team freedom ftw

Whether or not disruption took place is secondary to the policies and procedures put forth by the school. Speaking your mind may not cause disruption, but if it violates codes of conduct according to that organization, than they have every right to dismiss you if they choose to.
As I stated previously, hazing is now against all colleges/universities in the state of pennsylvania, whether or not disruption occurred against the person being hazed. If a fraternity is caught hazing, they will be disciplined, independent of the physical or psychological consequences, especially if someone reports them.
Youre free to walk down times square and scream racial slurs. But youre not free to scream racial slurs in organizations that may deem that behavior unacceptable. As I have stated 100 times, it all depends what are the policies and procedures for fraternities at the Univ. of Oklahoma.