Author Topic: Is Hillary Hiding Something  (Read 118359 times)


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63777
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #626 on: August 25, 2016, 07:23:14 PM »
Gowdy: Clinton Erased Emails So Meticulously ‘Even God Can’t Read Them’
Aug. 25, 2016   Tré Goins-Phillips   

Hillary Clinton’s legal team took such painstaking efforts to delete the former secretary of state’s emails that “even God can’t read them,” according to Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

Gowdy argued the use of BleachBit, a software whose website says it can “prevent recovery” of files, further bolsters accusations that Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president, had something to hide in deleting all the personal files from her time at the State Department.

According to Clinton, the emails she deleted were all of a personal nature, most of which pertained to yoga and her daughter’s wedding. Gowdy, though, isn’t so sure and wants to know if the presidential hopeful considered emails about the Clinton Foundation personal.

“She and her lawyers had those emails deleted. And they didn’t just push the delete button; they had them deleted where even God can’t read them,” the lawmaker said during an appearance on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” Thursday. “They were using something called BleachBit. You don’t use BleachBit for yoga emails or bridemaids emails. When you’re using BleachBit, it is something you really do not want the world to see.”

Gowdy argued that Clinton’s previous statements — and her untrue assertion that she never sent or received any classified information — should assist voters in determining the truthfulness of her claim that Clinton Foundation donors never received special treatment.

Clinton, for her part, told CNN’s Anderson Cooper Wednesday night, “There is a lot of smoke and there’s no fire.”

“It’s arson. It’s pyromania. It’s not smoke. Even listening to her talk about the Clinton Foundation, I couldn’t help but go back and remember the press conference she gave on her emails where every single thing she said proved to be false,” Gowdy said of the comment. “That’s the interesting thing about credibility and believability: You can’t just keep it in one compartment.”

“When you are a habitual, serial liar in this facet of life, it tends to make people not believe you in other facets of life,” he continued. “So when she’s talking about the Clinton Foundation, I go back and remember her saying there’s no classified information, I only used one device, I did it for convenience. All of which were proven to be false.”

The South Carolina Republican’s remarks come the same week the FBI recovered nearly 15,000 “previously undisclosed” emails found during the investigation into Clinton. State Department lawyers said they anticipate releasing the first batch of those emails in mid October.

Brian Fallon, Clinton’s press secretary, said in a statement at the time he is “not sure” what is in the new emails, but the campaign supports the release as long as the content is “work-related.”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/08/25/gowdy-clinton-erased-emails-so-meticulously-even-god-cant-read-them/#

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

TuHolmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5563
  • Darkness is fated to eventually be destroyed...
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #628 on: August 26, 2016, 09:14:34 AM »
Honestly, I have no problem with her using some extremely powerful software to delete emails.

That means either her, or someone on her staff is very smart.

If Gowdy is correct, then how does he know what the emails state?

I seriously question how she is the democratic nominee... What in the world is going on with the US? It's like I'm taking crazy pills.


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63777
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #630 on: August 29, 2016, 03:25:25 PM »
Tech firm brags about blocking FBI from recovering Clinton emails
By Sarah Westwood (@sarahcwestwood) • 8/26/16

What is BleachBit?

A technology company that provided the program Hillary Clinton's team used to scrub her private server of emails bragged on its website Thursday that it had prevented the FBI from accessing deleted records.
 
BleachBit, the publicly-available application that was used to deleted some of Clinton's emails ahead of an FBI investigation, said it had not yet been served a subpoena over its involvement in the destruction of potentially classified records.
 
A headline on the company's website read: "BleachBit stifles investigation of Hillary Clinton."
 
Rep. Trey Gowdy brought the involvement of the program to light Thursday when he told Fox News that Clinton's emails were so fully deleted that "even God can't read them."

Stay abreast of the latest developments from nation's capital and beyond with curated News Alerts from the Washington Examiner news desk and delivered to your inbox.

"Perhaps Clinton's team used an open source application [like BleachBit] because, unlike proprietary applications, it can be audited, like for backdoors," BleachBit noted in a post on its site.
 
"As of the time of writing BleachBit has not been served a warrant or subpoena in relation to the investigation," the company wrote. "BleachBit is free of charge to use in any environment whether it is personal, commercial, educational or governmental, and the cleaning process is not reversible."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tech-firm-brags-about-blocking-fbi-from-recovering-the-clinton-emails/article/2600283

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63777
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #631 on: August 31, 2016, 09:54:20 AM »
State finds 30 deleted Clinton emails on Benghazi
By SARAH WESTWOOD (@SARAHCWESTWOOD) • 8/30/16
Washington Examiner

State Department attorneys said Tuesday the agency had discovered 30 Benghazi-related emails among the records recovered from Hillary Clinton's private server.

A judge asked the agency to hasten its review of the documents in preparation for release to Judicial Watch, the conservative-leaning group that filed the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.

The emails were included among the roughly 15,000 emails FBI agents said they pulled from Clinton's server in the course of a year-long probe.

Others were deleted beyond recovery after the Democratic nominee's team used a digital tool called BleachBit to scrub the hardware that was eventually confiscated by law enforcement agents.

Subscribe today to get intelligence and analysis on defense and national security issues in your Inbox each weekday morning from veteran journalists Jamie McIntyre and Jacqueline Klimas.
 
Agency lawyers said during the hearing Tuesday before Judge Amit Mehta of U.S. District Court that they had not yet determined how many of the Benghazi-related emails had already been disclosed in the batch of 55,000 pages of emails Clinton turned over in late 2014.

Judicial Watch attorneys had asked the State Department to examine the deleted records in order to determine whether any fell under to its FOIA request for emails that mentioned Benghazi.

The discovery of 30 such emails is significant because Clinton has repeatedly assured the public, Congress and FBI agents that she turned over all work-related communications in late 2014.

Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, noted on Tuesday that the State Department had asked for 30 days to review the new records before releasing them to the group.

The lawsuit is one of several filed by Judicial Watch in pursuit of records related to Clinton's tenure.

In a separate case, the group sent Clinton 25 written questions about her decision to set up a private email network. Her responses, which she must submit within 30 days, will be considered sworn testimony by the court.

It is unclear how many emails were deleted beyond recovery by Clinton's team when they applied BleachBit to her server system. She claimed during a press conference in March 2015 that she "chose not to keep" roughly 30,000 emails she had deemed personal in nature.

But FBI Director James Comey said last month that his agents had pulled thousands of work-related records from the server, raising questions about how she determined which records to disclose and which to delete.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/state-department-finds-30-deleted-hillary-clinton-emails-on-benghazi/article/2600533

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #633 on: August 31, 2016, 12:13:58 PM »
So the only place said to be checked for relevant email, is that particular server?

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15694
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #634 on: August 31, 2016, 01:27:30 PM »
Clinton sent classified material over email after leaving State Department

Published August 31, 2016 
FoxNews.com

Hillary Clinton apparently kept sending classified information over her personal email after leaving the State Department, according to documents obtained by the Republican National Committee.

The file in question is a May 2013 email Clinton sent from her private account to State Department officials and aides discussing the “123 deal” with the United Arab Emirates.

Much of the message is redacted due to classified information. The markings list the material as “confidential” and say it can only be declassified in 2033.

The email was first reported by The New York Post.

Though the nature of the email exchange is unclear due to the redactions, the “123 deal” referred to a 2009 agreement with the UAE to share material and technology for nuclear energy.

As reported by the Post, the email came from Clinton’s hrod17@clintonemail.com account, and was sent to Deputy Secretary of State William Burns, State Department chief of staff Cheryl Mills, top Clinton aide Huma Abedin and others. It was sent months after Clinton left the department.

A review of the now-Democratic presidential nominee’s emails at State already has found the former secretary of state sent more than 2,100 messages with material now considered classified. But those were during her tenure at the department.

Republicans seized on the latest finding to once again challenge her trustworthiness with the nation’s secrets. 

“Hillary Clinton’s secret server jeopardized our national security and sensitive diplomatic efforts on more than 2,000 occasions, and shockingly, it now appears her reckless conduct continued even after leaving the State Department,” Donald Trump spokesman Jason Miller said in a statement. “Hillary Clinton’s terrible judgment shows she cannot be trusted with our national security.”

Clinton has claimed she never sent material that was classified at the time -- though FBI Director James Comey last month challenged that account, even as his bureau declined to pursue charges over her mishandling of sensitive information.

Regarding the email turned up in the RNC’s Freedom of Information Act request, Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said Wednesday that the campaign is investigating.

Meanwhile, the FBI is preparing to release some of the documents from its investigation in a matter of days.

Law enforcement sources told Fox News that FBI and Justice Department officials are in the process of determining what exactly will be released to the public.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/31/clinton-sent-classified-material-over-email-after-leaving-state-department.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63777
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #635 on: September 02, 2016, 02:39:53 PM »
Hillary Aide Deleted Emails After NYT Story Reveled Server Setup
By Jason Devaney   |    Friday, 02 Sep 2016

In the weeks following the publication of a 2015 New York Times story that unveiled Hillary Clinton's use of a private email setup, one of her aides began deleting emails from the server she used to conduct official state department business.

According to FBI documents made public Friday, the March 2, 2015 article set off a firestorm of activity in the Clinton camp.

Clinton aide Cheryl Mills contacted Platte River Networks, a Denver-based IT firm that was in possession of Clinton's server, and requested an inventory of all equipment related to the email server originally set up by another Clinton aide, Bryan Pagliano.

Another aide, whose name is redacted in the FBI documents, said he panicked and began deleting files.

"In a follow-up interview on May 3, 2016, [name redacted] indicated he believed he had an 'oh s**t' moment and sometime between March 25-31, 2015 deleted the Clinton archive mailbox from the PRN server and used BleachBit to delete the exported .PST files he had created on the server system containing Clinton's e-mails," the report reads.

"Investigation found evidence of these deletions and determined the Datto backups of the PRN Server were also manually deleted during this timeframe."

Both Mills and Clinton told the FBI they were not aware of the unnamed aide's actions in deleting the emails.

The FBI also discovered that there were several unsuccessful attempts to access Clinton's email account and her iCloud account that contained her email content after the Times story was published.

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/hillary-clinton-aide-deleted-emails/2016/09/02/id/746484/#ixzz4J8YYLzUs

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #636 on: September 02, 2016, 02:48:25 PM »
What do they mean by "unsuccessful attempts" I wonder.

TuHolmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5563
  • Darkness is fated to eventually be destroyed...
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #637 on: September 02, 2016, 02:49:36 PM »
What do they mean by "unsuccessful attempts" I wonder.

This is a good question. I would like to understand what they are saying as well.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #638 on: September 02, 2016, 04:42:43 PM »
This is a good question. I would like to understand what they are saying as well.

The whole affair is just one wtf after the next, really.  Something's not right and I hope that whatever it is, we don't find out too late.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #639 on: September 03, 2016, 09:55:10 PM »
I think the thing about "several unsuccessful attempts after the story was published" means it was just impulsive activity by people who read it.

Palumboism

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3598
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #640 on: September 04, 2016, 07:02:18 AM »
 Eric Trump questions Clintons’ enormous wealth: ‘What product were they selling?’

By S.A. Miller - The Washington Times - Friday, September 2, 2016

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s son Eric Trump questioned Friday how Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton became enormously wealthy running a charity, which has become the focus of the campaign’s allegation of pay-to-play corruption while she was secretary of state.

“The question I always ask is, what product were they selling? If we make a buck, we sold a bottle of wine or an apartment, or we sold a hotel room. What product were they selling to make $150 million,” Mr. Trump said on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends.”

Host Ainsley Earhardt suggested: “Favors? The government?”

“Of course,” responded Mr. Trump, who works on the campaign for his billionaire businessman father.

“This is the leadership we have in this country. Somebody sets up a foundation. They pocket hundreds of millions of dollars. They say they come out of the White House ‘dead broke.’ Now they are worth $150 million,” he said.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/2/eric-trump-questions-clintons-enormous-wealth-what/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63777
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #642 on: September 06, 2016, 01:23:10 PM »
'We wired it': Emails suggest Clinton aide stage-managed Benghazi hearing questions
By  Catherine Herridge,  Pamela K. Browne 
Published September 06, 2016
FoxNews.com

Newly released emails suggest a senior Hillary Clinton aide stage-managed her first hearing on the Benghazi terrorist attack by feeding specific topics Clinton wanted to address to Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez, who at the time was acting chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

"We wired it that Menendez would provide an opportunity to address two topics we needed to debunk (her actions/whereabouts on 9/11, and these email from Chris Stevens about moving locations,)" Clinton media gatekeeper Philippe Reines wrote to Chelsea Clinton the morning of the Jan. 23, 2013 hearing. 

Click here to read the emails

Right out of the gate, the first hearing question from Menendez that day covered both topics referenced by Reines.

Menendez asked for Clinton’s “insights on the decision-making process regarding the location of the Mission.” The senator added, “can you also in your response, you touched upon it in your opening statement, but what actions were you and your staff taking the night of September 11 and into September 12?"

The then-secretary of state had an answer on both fronts. She told the committee that "[Ambassador] Chris [Stevens] was committed to not only being in Benghazi but to the location," and that on the night of the attack, "I was notified of the attack shortly after 4:00 p.m. Over the following hours, we were in continuous meetings and conversations both within the department with our team in Tripoli, with the interagency and internationally."

Stevens was among four Americans killed in the attack.

The emails were obtained by the group Citizens United as part of its ongoing Freedom of Information Act request to the State Department for emails from Chelsea Clinton and Hillary Clinton's closest aides. 

“This email chain provides a rare behind the scenes look at which Benghazi-related issues the Clinton camp had concerns about going into Secretary Clinton’s January 2013 testimony on Capitol Hill, and what they had apparently plotted out beforehand with a Democrat committee member to deal with those concerns,” Citizens United said in a statement. “Citizens United will continue to release all new Benghazi emails we receive through our FOIA lawsuits as they come in -- the American people have a right to know the full picture.”

Fox News asked the Clinton campaign as well as Menendez's office if they coordinated before the 2013 Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing; what was meant by the term "wired;" and how the email exchange was consistent with the principle of independent congressional oversight. There was no immediate response from either.

In 2013, the New Jersey senator -- who is now facing federal public corruption charges -- at the time of the hearing was about to become chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, replacing John Kerry who was in line to replace Hillary Clinton as secretary of state. Menendez has denied any wrongdoing.

A previous release of emails from a separate FOIA action showed that on the night of the attack, Clinton told her daughter, who used the email pseudonym Diane Reynolds on clintonemail.com, that the attacks were the work of an "Al Queda-like group" – with no mention of an obscure anti-Islam video Clinton publicly linked to the 2012 terrorist attack. Chelsea Clinton uses the same pseudonym in the Menendez email.

Reines is a founding member of the Clinton-aligned consulting group Beacon Global Strategies. The online bios for its founders and managing director suggest no group knows more about the Benghazi terrorist attack and the Obama administration's response.

One of its senior counselors is former CIA Acting Director Mike Morell, who heavily edited the controversial Benghazi talking points, which helped establish the administration’s initial flawed narrative about the attack. Morell recently endorsed Clinton to the New York Times, but later was criticized for not fully disclosing his relationship to Beacon.

In a follow up Q-and-A with the Times, Morell wrote: "Among the many things I do in my post-government life -- teaching and writing, serving on corporate boards, speaking publicly on national security issues -- is work with Beacon Global Strategies, a firm that has prioritized nonpartisanship. The firm’s advisory board -- composed of appointees of both Republican and Democratic presidents, as well as career military officers -- make that priority clear. It all stems from a strong and shared belief that our national security is paramount and needs to be devoid of partisan politics."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/06/wired-it-emails-suggest-clinton-aide-stage-managed-benghazi-hearing-questions.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63777
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #643 on: September 07, 2016, 10:45:43 AM »
Clinton to FBI: Didn't know parenthetical 'C' stood for confidential
By Harper Neidig
September 02, 2016

Hillary Clinton told the FBI that she thought classification markings in the paragraphs of her emails at the Department of State were to organize messages in alphabetical order, according to the FBI’s newly released report on her private email server.

“When asked what the parenthetical ‘C’ meant before a paragraph within the captioned email, [Clinton] stated she did not know and could only speculate it was referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order,” read the FBI’s notes from the interview.

A “C” in parentheses in the body of an email is used to designate a specific paragraph as containing classified information.

Emails containing sensitive information are supposed to have “C” markings at the top of the message or in the subject line.

Clinton, former secretary of State, told the FBI that she understood that emails that are labeled with a “C” are classified.

When FBI Director James Comey testified before the House Oversight Committee in July, he said that classified emails found on Clinton’s server were not properly marked with a “C” in the heading, but did contain parenthetical C’s in the body.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/294323-clinton-thought-classified-markings-in-emails-were-meant

TheGrinch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5029
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #644 on: September 07, 2016, 12:39:52 PM »
GAME OVER  - Hildog 2016








Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #645 on: September 07, 2016, 01:52:22 PM »
Huma Abedin & Cheryl Mills told the FBI they didn’t know about Hillary’s server. Just one problem...
Bizpac Review ^ | 9/6/2016 | Michael Dorstewitz
Posted on 9/7/2016, 3:26:29 PM by simpson96

Two of Hillary Clinton’s top aides at the State Department — Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin — told the FBI that they were unaware of the former secretary of state’s use of a private email server.

However, emails they exchanged with one another tell a different story, The Daily Caller reported.

Mills served as Clinton’s chief of staff, and Abedin as deputy chief of staff during Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state.

The report the FBI released Friday indicated that most of the State Department employees claimed they “had no knowledge” that Clinton was using a private server, which she kept at her New York home. (snip)

However, after an email Mills sent to Clinton came back as undeliverable, she sent a message to Abedin and Justin Cooper, a Bill Clinton aide who helped set up the private server.

“hrc email coming back — is server okay?” her email to the pair said.

“Ur funny. We are on the same server,” Cooper told Mills and Abedin.

(Excerpt) Read more at bizpacreview.com ...


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39450
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #646 on: September 08, 2016, 03:54:16 AM »
Hillary Continues to Falsely State Material is Not Classified Unless It is Marked as Such
Excerpts from Time and Washington Post | September 7, 2016 | Allan J. Favish
Posted on 9/7/2016, 10:25:05 PM by AJFavish

At the military issues forum tonight Hillary lied again when she said that material is not classified unless it is marked as such. FBI Director Comey and other security experts say the opposite.

http://time.com/4483355/commander-chief-forum-clinton-trump-intrepid/

Hillary said:

But the real question is the handling of classified material, which is I think what the implication of your question was. And for all the viewers watching you tonight, I have a lot of experience dealing with classified material, starting when I was on the Senate Armed Services Committee going into the four years as secretary of state. Classified material has a header which says “top secret,” “secret,” “confidential.” Nothing — and I will repeat this, and this is verified in the report by the Department of Justice — none of the e-mails sent or received by me had such a header.

. . .

CLINTON: Well, I appreciate your concern and also your experience. But let me try to make the distinctions that I think are important for me to answer your question.

First, as I said to Matt, you know and I know classified material is designated. It is marked. There is a header so that there is no dispute at all that what is being communicated to or from someone who has that access is marked classified.

And what we have here is the use of an unclassified system by hundreds of people in our government to send information that was not marked, there were no headers, there was no statement, top secret, secret, or confidential.

I communicated about classified material on a wholly separate system. I took it very seriously. When I traveled, I went into one of those little tents that I’m sure you’ve seen around the world because we didn’t want there to be any potential for someone to have embedded a camera to try to see whatever it is that I was seeing that was designated, marked, and headed as classified.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/08/17/bill-clintons-misleading-claim-about-marked-classified-information-in-hillary-clintons-emails/

Excerpt:

Still, Comey said Clinton should have known better: “There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.” He noted that “even if information is not marked ‘classified’ in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.”

On July 8, Clinton’s language over emails changed again: “I certainly did not believe that I received or sent any material that was classified, and, indeed, any of the documents that have been referred to, I think were not marked, or were marked inaccurately, as has now been clarified.”

Strictly speaking, classification markings do not render information classified, and the absence of classification markings do not render it unclassified, said Steven Aftergood, director of the government secrecy project at the Federation of American Scientists. In fact, a person can share classified information at a cocktail party.

“If there is no banner or header at the top of a classified email indicating that it is classified, then it is improperly marked. But the lack of such a banner does not in itself render the email unclassified. There might still be classified information in it,” Aftergood said. “The lack of a banner does, however, explain how a recipient might easily consider it unclassified. Isolated portion markings such as ‘(C)’ might easily be overlooked or dismissed as errors, especially if their content seems innocuous.”

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #647 on: September 12, 2016, 10:16:17 AM »
a

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15694
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #648 on: September 12, 2016, 09:02:12 PM »
Lawmaker issues subpoena to FBI for Clinton probe records

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/12/lawmaker-issues-subpoena-to-fbi-for-clinton-probe-records.html

Quote
"We decide what's relevant — not the Department of Justice, not the FBI," Chaffetz said. "We are entitled to the full file."

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63777
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Is Hillary Hiding Something
« Reply #649 on: September 13, 2016, 10:01:24 AM »
Clinton IT specialist ignores subpoena for House hearing; other witnesses plead 5th
Published September 13, 2016 
FoxNews.com

The former State Department IT specialist who set up Hillary Clinton’s private server ignored a subpoena to appear Tuesday before a House committee hearing, while other tech experts who helped maintain the system asserted their Fifth Amendment right not to testify – frustrating Republican lawmakers trying to dig deeper into the former secretary of state’s email setup.

House oversight committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said he’ll now consider a “full range of options” to address IT aide Bryan Pagliano’s “failure” to attend.

“He should be here. … It is not optional,” Chaffetz said. “His attendance is required here.”

Pagliano is considered a vital witness in the Clinton email case. He spoke previously to the FBI under immunity, telling the bureau there were no successful security breaches of the server. Pagliano also refused to answer questions last year before a House panel investigating the deadly 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya. His lawyers said at the time that Pagliano did not want to relinquish his rights under the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination.

Republicans on Tuesday questioned why Pagliano would avoid the latest hearing if he had immunity, though Democrats pushed back. According to Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., Pagliano’s lawyer said the request was an “abuse of process.”

Two other officials from Platte River Networks, Bill Thornton and Paul Combetta, did comply with subpoenas to appear. However, when it came time to answer questions, they pleaded the Fifth. The Denver-based technology company maintained Clinton’s server when it was moved from her Chappaqua, New York, home to a data center in northern New Jersey.

Combetta took the Fifth six times and Thornton took the Fifth four times, before both witnesses were excused.

After each question, they recited a variation of the line: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer and assert my Fifth Amendment constitutional privilege.”


Cummings said he could “understand” why they were not addressing questions.

But Chaffetz voiced frustration when Thornton declined to even answer whether he’d been questioned by the FBI. GOP lawmakers have wanted to question tech officials on the deletion of email records and other alleged attempts to destroy devices.

Chaffetz also said there will be consequences for Pagliano's refusal to appear and for "thumbing his nose at Congress." He didn't specify what the penalties would be but said, "We're not letting go of this."

A letter from Pagliano's attorney released by the committee says Pagliano will continue to assert his constitutional right not to testify.

The only witness remaining after the unfruitful initial questioning was Bill Clinton aide Justin Cooper, who answered lawmakers’ questions.

During that process, he confirmed that he had access to the Clinton server but did not hold a security clearance.

The email issue has shadowed Clinton's candidacy, and Republicans have been steadfast in focusing on her use of a private server for government business, with several high-profile hearings leading up to the election. Democrats insist the sole purpose of the hearings is to undermine Clinton's bid for the presidency.

Chaffetz on Monday escalated the GOP's battle with the FBI after its decision in July not to recommend criminal charges against Clinton for her use of the private email system by serving a top FBI official with a subpoena for the full case file. Chaffetz and other Republicans on the panel said the bureau has withheld summaries of interviews with witnesses and unnecessarily blacked out material from documents sent last month.

“We are entitled to the full file," he said.

Dismissing the "emergency" hearing held late on a Monday, Cummings said: "As far as I can tell, the only `emergency' is that the election is less than two months away."

Chaffetz issued the subpoena to Jason Herring, the acting assistant FBI director for congressional affairs. Herring and six other Obama administration officials appeared before the committee to discuss the investigative files. The witnesses on several occasions said they could not answer the questions from lawmakers in an open forum.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/13/clinton-it-expert-ignores-subpoena-skips-house-hearing-other-witnesses-plead-5th.html