But thats exactly what you're saying now, pizza face.
No, it isn't. You claimed the entire study only had 10 respondents and that the people who conducted the study limited respondents to to make it more accurate.
I said that there were 150000 respondents and that after breaking down the entire study into categories, some of those categories have fewer than 10 sample cases. This makes those statistics unreliable.
Two completely different things.