One thing that has kind of struck me, and maybe we are just getting a skewed perspective. But it seems like Harley gets a lot of cases where he has to defends low lifes. Is it because he likes to take the cases that no one else will because he has a good heart or is it because when a low life is seeking legal advice and someone listens to the details of the crime they say, "You know, for someone like you, a low life and guilty as sin, I got the perfect guy for you. Nothing is guaranteed but if anyone can pull magic out of a hat I got your guy."
That over the years/decades he's developed a reputation as the go to guy for the guilty and reprehensible. Kind of like an attorney for the mob boss and his minions except without the protection and the clout.
Sorry Harley, just thinking out loud. Your answer to my previous question will clear the issue up a bit.
Of course everyone deserves a fair trial and that one gets the punishment that suits the crime or no punishment if no crime has been committed. If not, then it would be left to mob rule and that fella would be lynched on the spot.
The issue, vis-a-vis Harley, is not that he would represent this person, or any person, that the public has deemed a scumbag. A more interesting question for Harley would be that when he represents a client what takes priority? That his client gets a fair trial or that he wins his case?