|
Thin Lizzy
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: April 25, 2006, 04:13:41 PM » |
|
Was it Frank Zane, Chet Yorton, or Sergio?  1968 Mr. Universe |
|
|
|
|
Hypertrophy
Getbig III
Posts: 441
Getbig!
|
|
« Reply #26 on: April 25, 2006, 05:20:46 PM » |
|
Man he looks good in that pic. More so than in his Olympia days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
alexxx
|
|
« Reply #27 on: April 25, 2006, 05:27:03 PM » |
|
Nubret all the way!
|
just push some weight!
|
|
|
|
Gord
|
|
« Reply #28 on: April 30, 2006, 04:25:10 AM » |
|
|
Lies, damn lies and diets
|
|
|
|
DK II
|
|
« Reply #29 on: April 30, 2006, 01:35:01 PM » |
|
both look absolutely great.
|
糞
|
|
|
|
(nothing)
|
|
« Reply #30 on: May 06, 2006, 08:11:36 PM » |
|
surge!
zane had him on conditioning and a slight edge on legs. just personal preference surge all the way!
|
fat till furthe
|
|
|
|
pumpster
|
|
« Reply #31 on: May 11, 2006, 04:51:06 PM » |
|
Nubret was behind only Oliva & Schwarzenegger, and looked the part of a BB, unlike Zane. Both with excellent balance but Nubret was way ahead in size AND shape, even had the edge in aesthetics IMO. Nubret's still the closest I've seen to a statue; the complete aesthetic package. Bannout & Zane were very good but not in the same sentence. Even today there aren't many that are close. For aesthetics I'd also put Birdsong over Zane and Bannout. Here's some good info on Nubret: http://ironage.us/yabbse/index.php?topic=13814.0 |
|
|
|
|
Dredlock Rasta
Getbig III
Posts: 601
Can't trust shadows after dark
|
|
« Reply #32 on: May 12, 2006, 10:26:50 AM » |
|
Nubret wins hands down, he had much more fullness and mass than Zane yet he also had a smaller waist.
|
Don't let em fool ya
|
|
|
|
onlyme
|
|
« Reply #33 on: May 13, 2006, 01:09:37 AM » |
|
Nubret was awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
|
thor_odin
|
|
« Reply #34 on: May 13, 2006, 03:15:51 AM » |
|
Nubret was always more juiced up than Frank Zane. If both were totally natural bodybuilders then Nubret would not be in the same league as Zane.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pumpster
|
|
« Reply #35 on: May 13, 2006, 10:10:17 AM » |
|
Nubret was always more juiced up than Frank Zane. That's a whiny, unfounded accusation. Aesthetics with size, no one can touch Nubret. |
|
|
|
|
|
willie mosconi
|
|
« Reply #36 on: May 13, 2006, 11:30:07 AM » |
|
Why would anybody think Zane was better than Nubret? To me it isn't even close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
eddiebubble
|
|
« Reply #37 on: May 14, 2006, 12:04:15 AM » |
|
Here's a fantastic picture of Frank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kimo
|
|
« Reply #38 on: October 26, 2012, 06:09:44 AM » |
|
serge ha d a better chest and better traps than frank . better midsection even . frank has better legs but not that great legs on either man . zane a bit more symmetrical .
|
|
|
|
|
|
kimo
|
|
« Reply #39 on: October 26, 2012, 08:23:15 AM » |
|
frank a better poser . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donny
|
|
« Reply #40 on: October 26, 2012, 09:25:15 AM » |
|
frank a better poser . .
I would have to agree. Frank Zane was really for me the ideal Olympian Greek ideal. Serge was also an outstanding Bodybuilder but never displayed it like Zane. |
|
|
|
|
|
GoneAway
|
|
« Reply #41 on: November 11, 2012, 05:54:18 AM » |
|
I would have to agree. Frank Zane was really for me the ideal Olympian Greek ideal. Serge was also an outstanding Bodybuilder but never displayed it like Zane.
Arguably, Serge had the better structure but Frank (again, arguably) mastered the art of displaying his structure better. It's apples and apples. |
|
|
|
|
|
Donny
|
|
« Reply #42 on: November 13, 2012, 09:39:04 AM » |
|
Arguably, Serge had the better structure but Frank (again, arguably) mastered the art of displaying his structure better. It's apples and apples.
yes both great champions and each had a great..no outstanding physique. |
|
|
|
|
|
njflex
|
|
« Reply #43 on: November 13, 2012, 10:06:15 AM » |
|
yes both great champions and each had a great..no outstanding physique.
YEAH ,,,ZANE IS ONE OF MY FAV'S LIKE TO FAVOR MY BUILD TO HIS PHILOSPHY,, |
$
|
|
|
|
Donny
|
|
« Reply #44 on: November 13, 2012, 10:38:00 AM » |
|
YEAH ,,,ZANE IS ONE OF MY FAV'S LIKE TO FAVOR MY BUILD TO HIS PHILOSPHY,,
yes you have developed a very good proportioned physique. very Balanced. size is not everything. It should be symmetrical. |
|
|
|
|
|
njflex
|
|
« Reply #45 on: November 13, 2012, 10:48:21 AM » |
|
yes you have developed a very good proportioned physique. very Balanced. size is not everything. It should be symmetrical.
thank you kind words i love 80/90 bbing have still boxes of mags from that era .... |
$
|
|
|
|
Donny
|
|
« Reply #46 on: November 13, 2012, 10:56:24 AM » |
|
thank you kind words i love 80/90 bbing have still boxes of mags from that era ....
I will not say the Guys today are not "Champions" but when i think of a Frank Zane or Bob Paris..really the difference is like day and night. |
|
|
|
|
|
njflex
|
|
« Reply #47 on: November 13, 2012, 11:02:22 AM » |
|
I will not say the Guys today are not "Champions" but when i think of a Frank Zane or Bob Paris..really the difference is like day and night.
i agree there are some great builds out there but older champs and look were all different not same as today cycle,roll the dice see what developes...they trained back then hard,had unique builds..most are blocks now no shape or no flow,,, |
$
|
|
|
|
jpm101
|
|
« Reply #48 on: November 14, 2012, 09:29:20 AM » |
|
Zane and Nubret (and others of that era) had a harmony of body parts. Muscles of one area seemed to flow and match other parts of their body, in that harmony. Each BB'er had individual characteristics that set them apart from another.
Not a question of Zane vs Nubret, but which type appeals most to you.
Present Pro's resemble cartoon characters, which I think the magazines, book and video producers are forcing on the general BB'ing public. When your a teenager, you might believe it's cool to look like them. As one matures, being honest with yourself, the current Pro's do look a bit ridiculous. Their health conditions are borderline ER room stat. Only my view but; Judging all this from many personal viewing of them, in the gym and out.
|
F
|
|
|
|
Donny
|
|
« Reply #49 on: November 14, 2012, 09:44:45 AM » |
|
Zane and Nubret (and others of that era) had a harmony of body parts. Muscles of one area seemed to flow and match other parts of their body, in that harmony. Each BB'er had individual characteristics that set them apart from another.
Not a question of Zane vs Nubret, but which type appeals most to you.
Present Pro's resemble cartoon characters, which I think the magazines, book and video producers are forcing on the general BB'ing public. When your a teenager, you might believe it's cool to look like them. As one matures, being honest with yourself, the current Pro's do look a bit ridiculous. Their health conditions are borderline ER room stat. Only my view but; Judging all this from many personal viewing of them, in the gym and out.
I agree 100%. As you get older you are more realistic and Health and well being is more important. |
|
|
|
|
|
