President Obama put a ‘raw onion’ in his podium so he could cry fake tears

[iwantmass]

The data we have support my claim all the way through.

You refuse to believe it because it would further expose your ass as a misinformed sheep.

Now you post some data that support your claim.

You haven't provided data. Data would be the answers collected. I don't recall you providing those

In addition, this is what now, the 3rd time that you've ignored the author of the survey stating that people like you are using his survey dishonestly, and lying for political gain

[whork]

You haven't provided data. Data would be the answers collected. I don't recall you providing those

In addition, this is what now, the 3rd time that you've ignored the author of the survey stating that people like you are using his survey dishonestly, and lying for political gain

For the last time:

Some data is better than no data. The small amount of data support my claim. No data support your claim.

Did you watch some of the Daily Show episodes?

[iwantmass]

For the last time:

Some data is better than no data. The small amount of data support my claim. No data support your claim.

Did you watch some of the Daily Show episodes?

Absolutely not.  What kind of idiot says some data is better than no data.  Given the author of the survey is calling you a liar, we can see what is wrong with that statement.  Some.data is provided by people like you in an attempt to be dishonest.  There is a reason people.don't provide all the info, because it would also provide the whole context.

Let's look at how you said you had numerous examples showing that fox lies more.  When pressed on the issue, you provided a few links.  Upon reading these links, we see they all refer to 1 survey. The survey had nothing to do with fox honesty, but rather the knowledge base of viewers on current events.  Upon looking at that survey, we see it was very limited and had to be administered a 2nd time as a result of its severe limitations.  If we look further, the author of the survey says it doesn't mean anything as what you claim it does.  In fact, he says the deviation is trivial and says people.like you are using it in a dishonest manner.

You've seemed pretty stupid this entire thread, but to somehow imply some data is good enough (which you still haven't provided) puts your intellect even further in the crapper.

I've watched the daily show plenty.  He is  funny guy with no journalistic responsibility.  If he gets things wrong or is called it, he claims it was a joke and he isn't a journalist.

We are literally to the point that all the studies you claim to have that show fox to lie more are now completely reliant on episodes of the daily show.  That's about what I expected at the beginning of this thread

[whork]

Yes a survey that shows FOX viewers being uninformed is very much an indicator that FOX is not very credible. But we agree it at least show that FOX viewers is less informed than others. You are a perfect example of this.

And yes this survey + thousands of daily show episodes is a million times better than the retarded opinion from someone who watches FOX.


And dont even compare the times FOX has been wrong to Stewart. Fucking moron.

[iwantmass]

Yes a survey that shows FOX viewers being uninformed is very much an indicator that FOX is not very credible. But we agree it at least show that FOX viewers is less informed than others. You are a perfect example of this.

And yes this survey + thousands of daily show episodes is a million times better than the retarded opinion from someone who watches FOX.


And dont even compare the times FOX has been wrong to Stewart. Fucking moron.

No, the survey doesn't show anything you just said, the author has said as much but you keep ignoring that.  The fact that you've ignored it multiple times tells me you are deliberately lying and not just ignorant to the subject

It's quite pathetic that your multiple studies now break down to episodes of the daily show as evidence

You can keep trying and I will keep making you look stupid.  I'm still waiting for your database of studies

[whork]

No, the survey doesn't show anything you just said, the author has said as much but you keep ignoring that.  The fact that you've ignored it multiple times tells me you are deliberately lying and not just ignorant to the subject


This is fucking sad. You could have searched and posted data to support your claim and we could both have gotten smarter yet you just keep whining and refuse to back up anything. If the data is so bad find your own you lazy bum.

It's quite pathetic that your multiple studies now break down to episodes of the daily show as evidence.

No what is pathetic is that i made the effort of telling you where to find the evidence yet you just keep whining and refuse to look at it because you dont want your delutions destoyed.

You can keep trying and I will keep making you look stupid.  I'm still waiting for your database of studies

You dont make anyone look stupid besides yourself but you do a good job at that no doubt. A database of studies on this matter doesnt exist but even if it did you would find a way to refuse to look at it. You could argue that a database on this exist in the form of Daily show episodes but you refuse to look at those instead you opted to give your stupid opinion for 6 pages. Stay ignorant.. fag.

[iwantmass]

Nothing you've provided has shown any data.  You haven't provided any place to get data.  You are so incompetent/illiterate  that 1) you thought you were proving multiple studies 2) you actually didn't know how to interpret what you posted 3) you continue to lie about the nature of what you posted.

No one is supporting you here.  It's clear at this point that you know you've completely lost the argument and you just want to get the last word.  I won't let that happen. I will just keep making you look stupid over and over again.  

Why do you continue to ignore and lie about the nature of the survey and what the author actually says about the survey.

Why are you so incompetent and idiotic that you consider a comedy a viable news source.  Do you also consider anchorman a viable news source?  It is the equivalent of the daily show and has fake anchorman in it?

Your data isn't only bad, it is nonexistent.  Data would be the answers collected from the survey.  The statistical breakdown is the interpretation of the results that were collected.  You can't and won't provide the actual data.  At this point I'm confident you don't even know what data is.  Further, if you would stop with the lies and take ownership of your incompetence, the author of the study has said people like yourself are lying and being dishonest with his survey and it means absolutely zero of what you say.  Why do you keep ignoring that point?  I will keep bringing it up every time you bump this thread in a sad attempt to save face.

In case it isn't clear to you, you aren't winning here.  You made a claim, modified that claim several times, and still fail to produce 1 shred of evidence.



And yet again, you made the claim that fox is more dishonest and evidence is available everywhere.  It is your job to prove that, not my job to disprove it.  In no place in the real world does 1 have to disprove the false claim of a random idiot

Oh boy, a data base doesn't exist, but even if it did.....Wow how the argument has changed.  And no the daily show does not represent a database.

[whork]

Nothing you've provided has shown any data.  You haven't provided any place to get data.

Stop lying bitch. Thousands of Daily show episodes, a survey and everybody who grew up with a (somewhat) free press will tell you the same thing. The fact that you are an ignorant has no effect on the rest of the World only on your pitiful existence.

You are so incompetent/illiterate  that 1) you thought you were proving multiple studies 2) you actually didn't know how to interpret what you posted 3) you continue to lie about the nature of what you posted.

No one is supporting you here.  It's clear at this point that you know you've completely lost the argument and you just want to get the last word.  I won't let that happen. I will just keep making you look stupid over and over again.  

Why do you continue to ignore and lie about the nature of the survey and what the author actually says about the survey.

Why are you so incompetent and idiotic that you consider a comedy a viable news source.

Why are you so incompetent and idiotic that you consider a propaganda station a viable news source?

Do you also consider anchorman a viable news source?  It is the equivalent of the daily show and has fake anchorman in it?




Your data isn't only bad, it is nonexistent.  Data would be the answers collected from the survey.  The statistical breakdown is the interpretation of the results that were collected.  You can't and won't provide the actual data.  At this point I'm confident you don't even know what data is.  Further, if you would stop with the lies and take ownership of your incompetence, the author of the study has said people like yourself are lying and being dishonest with his survey and it means absolutely zero of what you say.  Why do you keep ignoring that point?  I will keep bringing it up every time you bump this thread in a sad attempt to save face.

In case it isn't clear to you, you aren't winning here.  You made a claim, modified that claim several times, and still fail to produce 1 shred of evidence.



And yet again, you made the claim that fox is more dishonest and evidence is available everywhere.  It is your job to prove that, not my job to disprove it.  In no place in the real world does 1 have to disprove the false claim of a random idiot.

Its not my job to prove it to you you lazy bum. Its your point to research the point yourself and form an opinion on the matter. Unfortunately this matter is to close to your heart and actually researching it would expose you as an ignorant fool. You dont have the moral and mental fortitude to do this so you choose a life of denial instead.

Oh boy, a data base doesn't exist, but even if it did.....Wow how the argument has changed.  And no the daily show does not represent a database.
There is thousands of episodes, data for everyone to look but you refuse to do it because you want to live in denial. You are a mental Coward.

[iwantmass]

Thank you for finally admitting you have no evidence to support your bullshit argument.  I'm glad you have completely abandoned your original argument and now want me to investigate something that is a figment of your imagination.  I don't really have any reason to do that....because I wasn't the one to claim to have massive amounts of proof that fox lies more than the other networks.  

I'm glad you watch comedy central and derive all of your news from there.  While you are confident in its accuracy, I will remain skeptical.  Since that is where you derive all of your "facts", you should give south park a try.  It's funnier the the daily show and less biased.

I think it's abundantly clear to everyone that has read your train wreck over the last 7 pages, you have no business in commenting on anyone's mental capacity or logic.  You just cited "the opinion of anyone growing up with a free press" as data...