No, it is a classic case of missing counterevidence, because official investigation is all about the proved facts, and that crap of yours doesn't include anything to prove the official investigation faulty. Your screaming and crying doesn't mean anything else than pointing out the fact, that you are an idiot. All you have to do, is prove there were explosion in the WTC towers, so please show even one from any video filmed that day? If some of the foil hats would have been able to do it, there wouldn't be this thread at all, so why don't you prove it? Why don't you even try? What kind of moron you are, because it would be by far the easiest way to prove the conspiracy? So why it doesn't happen? BECAUSE THERE ISN'T ANY EXPLOSIONS. That is the only reason, and you can't prove otherwise, no matter how much you cry and scream. So, now, when no one have no doubt that you are an idiot, what next?
Ask your self, why it is even in fire? What start the fire? WTC 1, when it fall over and against WTC 7, as you can see from the videos an photos. When 400 meters tall building fall over the 250 meters tall building, there would be some energy moving to building to another one, so WTC 7 get serious structural damages(proved fact) and fire starts. After burning bit shy from 8 hours, it collapse. As you see in the video, "penthouse" and roof beneath it goes first, and you can see the sky through the top floor windows. Then falling roof pulls rest of the building down, and this is the miraculous moment for the foil hats, because their shepherds has told them that this little piece of the 14 seconds long collapse is all there is.
This individual proves again what type of goverment shill he is, the types of lies that he posts here, and just the amount of respons that no normal person would bother on a simple website like Getbig. But some how we(americans) are to believe a retarded inbreed from Finland is going the distance to proves us wrong.
Good, obvious all his answers will take some time to dismantle but we will start with building 7.
Facts:
Building 7 was a 47-story skyscraper and was part of the World Trade Center complex. Built in 1984, it would have been the tallest high-rise in 33 states in the United States. It collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, 2001. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers. Neither did the building to it's right or the building to it's left suffer any major damage and suffer any fires, still been next to bulding7 and acroos the street from the Twin Towers.
The total collapse of WTC 7 in 6.5 seconds at free fall acceleration (NIST admits 2.25 seconds). Larry Silverstein used the term “Pull it”. Steel framed high rise buildings have NEVER totally collapsed from fire or structural damage. Builidng 7 was not hit by a plane. ‘Building 7’, ‘WTC 7’.
If fire caused Building 7 to collapse, it would be the first ever fire-induced collapse of a steel-frame high-rise.
Building 7’s collapse was not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.
In May 2002, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) issued a report on the collapse based on a preliminary investigation conducted jointly with the Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers under leadership of Dr. W. Gene Corley, P.E. FEMA made preliminary findings that the collapse was not primarily caused by actual impact damage from the collapse of 1 WTC and 2 WTC but by fires on multiple stories ignited by debris from the other two towers that continued burning unabated due to lack of water for sprinklers or manual firefighting. The report did not reach conclusions about the cause of the collapse and called for further investigation.[26]
It took the federal government seven years to conduct an investigation and issue a report for Building 7.
7 years to cook up the official story, which took less than 1 year for the official conspiracy report on 9/11.In November 2008, NIST released its final report on the causes of the collapse of 7 World Trade Center.[7] This followed NIST's August 21, 2008, draft report which included a period for public comments.[8] In its investigation, NIST utilized ANSYS to model events leading up to collapse initiation and LS-DYNA models to simulate the global response to the initiating events.[52] NIST determined that diesel fuel did not play an important role, nor did the structural damage from the collapse of the Twin Towers or the transfer elements (trusses, girders, and cantilever overhangs). The lack of water to fight the fire was an important factor. The fires burned out of control during the afternoon, causing floor beams near column 79 to expand and push a key girder off its seat, triggering the floors to fail around column 79 on Floors 8 to 14. With a loss of lateral support across nine floors, column 79 buckled – pulling the east penthouse and nearby columns down with it. With the buckling of these critical columns, the collapse then progressed east-to-west across the core, ultimately overloading the perimeter support, which buckled between Floors 7 and 17, causing the remaining portion of the building above to fall downward as a single unit.
The fires, fueled by office contents, along with the lack of water, were the key reasons for the collapse.
First time in history, by the way.In addition to the Twin Towers and Building 7, the World Trade Center complex included buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6. Compared to Building 7, all of these buildings were severely damaged, first by falling rubble from the tower collapses, then by fires that burned for hours. Although these buildings were in critical condition, none of them collapsed.Facts with pictures below, you imbecile piece of shit, which I will own like the other retards who have blindly believed the official conspiracy report on 9/11 from our beloved crooked goverment.
http://www.wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5_files/fig-5-26.jpghttp://rememberbuilding7.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/wtc-building-7-map_22.jpghttps://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fi.stack.imgur.com%2FfR5NN.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fskeptics.stackexchange.com%2Fquestions%2F1368%2Fon-9-11-was-building-7-destroyed-in-a-controlled-explosion&docid=33Rar28hzi4l1M&tbnid=bcz_bhErd8f1TM%3A&w=2070&h=1656&bih=993&biw=1920&ved=0ahUKEwjXoqTlibzMAhUGJx4KHejuBf0QMwhNKCYwJg&iact=mrc&uact=8https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.indymedia.org.uk%2Fimages%2F2010%2F09%2F457945.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boards.ie%2Fb%2Fthread%2F2057150936&docid=zacXhQFWv7xlyM&tbnid=3XaVoU5CpYmiHM%3A&w=594&h=390&bih=993&biw=1920&ved=0ahUKEwjXoqTlibzMAhUGJx4KHejuBf0QMwhTKCwwLA&iact=mrc&uact=8#h=390&w=594
