rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?

[Colossus_1986]

Ropo you are a stupid phaggot.

Stop talking.

[M4tad0r]

When that has happen? Are you meaning that when you go away crying you have demolished something? You silly brat, it is almost too easy to anyone check that out, and anyone can see that it haven happen, so shut the fuck up. And really, do it make any difference, because there is on common thing for all these threads about the foil hat conspiracies, because not even one of them include any evidence about the conspiracy.

Why you morons are so blind about this fact? In which way it presents any kind of intelligence to believe all that crap without asking any evidence? Everything about his conspiracy is based on foil hat lies, and you can't prove none of them to be a fact. You know this and that is the reason why you don't even try, even if I have promised that I will shut up permanently if someone show me even one real evidence about the explosions at the 9/11 videos. So you have demolished me by screaming like an ape, throwing crap all over the place, but not presenting the evidence, which is only way to shut me up? And this proves you to be a) an imbecile b) a moron c) a blithering idiot? You don't need that silly video to prove it, your intelligence is so enormous, that you can't even link the YouTube video properly in your comment? How hard is that? Too much for your brains, evidently??

What part does ropo the retarded inbreed does not understand that the official report is a conspiracy theory in it self, dummy. It is becoming clear  this person is working with an agenda most likely paid by somebody, and sooner or later he will be buried here, hopefully ban.

 Another fact which is not a conspiracy is that congress spent more money investigating Bill Clinton having his dindong suck by a whore than they spent investigating the biggest terrorist attack on our homeland and the biggest failure of government, AND spent much less time investigating the dead of 3000 people than what they have spent investigating the dead of 3 people with Benghazi.. Let that sink in for a minute.

But hey, government conspiracy reports must be  true, like back in the 60's with the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.

[Simple Simon]

What part does ropo the retarded inbreed does not understand that the official report is a conspiracy theory in it self, dummy. It is becoming clear  this person is working with an agenda most likely paid by somebody, and sooner or later he will be buried here, hopefully ban.

 Another fact which is not a conspiracy is that congress spent more money investigating Bill Clinton having his dindong suck by a whore than they spent investigating the biggest terrorist attack on our homeland and the biggest failure of government, AND spent much less time investigating the dead of 3000 people than what they have spent investigating the dead of 3 people with Benghazi.. Let that sink in for a minute.

But hey, government conspiracy reports must be  true, like back in the 60's with the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.

Why would you have to spend a lot of money investigating something that was blatantly obvious what had happened

[obsidian]

Why would you have to spend a lot of money investigating something that was blatantly obvious what had happened

The official investigation claims an airplane flew into the Pentagon. Yet the only video available clearly indicates it was a missile. You don't think this is cause for concern? Just a little detail that's wrong??

[obsidian]

Why you morons are so blind about this fact? In which way it presents any kind of intelligence to believe all that crap without asking any evidence? Everything about his conspiracy is based on foil hat

The only moron that is blind is you Ropo. First of all, your grammar sucks. Learn to speak English.

Where is the plane? Why is the lawn so nice after a plane plowed into the building at ground level? Hint: It was not a plane

[obsidian]

Which one of those was hit by the 375 000 lb passenger jet? This foil hat way of compare totally different things to each other is quite funny, but do it prove anything else than your desperate need to believe that bullshit?

Classic case of the pot calling the kettle black. Ropo, please take off the tin foil hat you fucking moron.

WTC7 was not hit by a passenger jet. Neither was the Pentagon. You believe in bullshit. Go do some research and educate yourself.

[Simple Simon]

The official investigation claims an airplane flew into the Pentagon. Yet the only video available clearly indicates it was a missile. You don't think this is cause for concern? Just a little detail that's wrong??

no it doesn't, its inconclusive, are you seriously saying you can see a missile?

[OneMoreRep]

I remember when this occurred. I was down by Washington Square Park walking my dog, just having finished eating lunch at Eva's (This mini, bodybuilding diner/eatery spot on 8th street off of 5th Avenue, that served meals catered to health aficionados/bodybuilders and had a supplement shop at the back of their store - EVERY IFBB pro in NYC would eat there, sometimes daily).

Anyhow, once the first plane hit, everyone at Eva's heard a loud boom. We figured a power generator might have blown somewhere on the NYU campus. I then proceeded to try and pay for my meal and the Greek owner at the counter realized my credit card was not getting processed properly. I wasn't sure what was going on, but thankfully he told me the meal was on him due to his machine being down.

I walked out of Eva's and then made my way to Washington Square Park and saw the largest cloud of smoke originating from one of the towers. I stood there and stared for a good 30 minutes and in between that time, the second plane hit.

That's when I decided to get the fuck out of the area and make my way uptown (by foot). That day I walked all the way from the East Village to 96th street and Broadway (4-5 miles away) and spent the night with other NY'ers hearing news updates at a local computer cafe.

Crazy times...

"1"

[Army of One]

I remember when this occurred. I was down by Washington Square Park walking my dog, just having finished eating lunch at Eva's (This mini, bodybuilding diner/eatery spot on 8th street off of 5th Avenue, that served meals catered to health aficionados/bodybuilders and had a supplement shop at the back of their store - EVERY IFBB pro in NYC would eat there, sometimes daily).

Anyhow, once the first plane hit, everyone at Eva's heard a loud boom. We figured a power generator might have blown somewhere on the NYU campus. I then proceeded to try and pay for my meal and the Greek owner at the counter realized my credit card was not getting processed properly. I wasn't sure what was going on, but thankfully he told me the meal was on him due to his machine being down.

I walked out of Eva's and then made my way to Washington Square Park and saw the largest cloud of smoke originating from one of the towers. I stood there and stared for a good 30 minutes and in between that time, the second plane hit.

That's when I decided to get the fuck out of the area and make my way uptown (by foot). That day I walked all the way from the East Village to 96th street and Broadway (4-5 miles away) and spent the night with other NY'ers hearing news updates at a local computer cafe.

Crazy times...

"1"

Did you see the 2nd plane hit?

[Ronnie Rep]

“I was down there, and I watch our police and our firemen down on 7-Eleven, down at the World Trade Center, right after it came down and I saw the greatest people I have ever seen in action.”

- Trump, today.

He was sucking down a Slurpee, I saw him.

[WalterWhite]

[illuminati]

no it doesn't, its inconclusive, are you seriously saying you can see a missile?

No it isn't conclusive footage played at that speed.
Though I would hazard a guess that...
1, The footage could be slowed down - possibly to frame by frame.
2, That there would be other Cameras with better images of what it was.
3, It appears very low to the ground - Possibly if it is a plane - There could of been tyre marks.

The Whole 9/11 Catastrophe just doesn't seem to add up to the Official Story.
A bit like the Diana / Dodi Accident & The Death of Dr David Kelly, etc etc.

[Simple Simon]

No it isn't conclusive footage played at that speed.
Though I would hazard a guess that...
1, The footage could be slowed down - possibly to frame by frame.
2, That there would be other Cameras with better images of what it was.
3, It appears very low to the ground - Possibly if it is a plane - There could of been tyre marks.

The Whole 9/11 Catastrophe just doesn't seem to add up to the Official Story.
A bit like the Diana / Dodi Accident & The Death of Dr David Kelly, etc etc.

fucking lol, they werent planning on landing properly FFS

[illuminati]

fucking lol, they werent planning on landing properly FFS

Really is that the best you can answer.
If so don't bother - your showing yourself up.

Try being slightly more constructive.

[Simple Simon]

Really is that the best you can answer.
If so don't bother - your showing yourself up.

Try being slightly more constructive.

and saying "it doesnt seem to add up" whilst producing absolutely fuck all in the means of evidence is typical of tin foil hatters.

Arguing with people like you is like trying to convince this guy the world really isnt going to end.

[Las Vegas]

Here's a little better visual info on it.  If you look carefully, you'll see the impact on the outer wall has already taken place by frame two: the hole has come into existence and the fire has begun to rise above the building.



Another thing to consider, is that the frame-rate on this camera may have been as little as 1 frame per second.  That wouldn't be unusual for a security camera.  Meaning that a plane might have spanned the visible distance and completely entered the building in less than a second.  IF it was a plane, and IF there are no removed frames, then that's exactly what it must mean.

[Las Vegas]

^You can tab that image or 'view image' to see it larger.

[Las Vegas]

The overhead scene with the hit is really something to see, but pretty sure it isn't authentic.

[Las Vegas]

^Anyone know of any claims made about that overhead video?  How's it said to have been taken?

[Fortress]

Ropo typing like a fiend, melting, with each and every keystroke painting himself a severe 'tard.

[Fortress]

No it isn't conclusive footage played at that speed.
Though I would hazard a guess that...
1, The footage could be slowed down - possibly to frame by frame.
2, That there would be other Cameras with better images of what it was.
3, It appears very low to the ground - Possibly if it is a plane - There could of been tyre marks.

The Whole 9/11 Catastrophe just doesn't seem to add up to the Official Story.
A bit like the Diana / Dodi Accident & The Death of Dr David Kelly, etc etc.

"Could have/could've"

HTH

[obsidian]

no it doesn't, its inconclusive, are you seriously saying you can see a missile?

I know that's not a plane. The plane would have been visible in even 1 frame. The grass lawn was undisturbed even though the plane supposedly entered on the first level. Witnesses saw an aircraft fly over them and they were not near the light poles that were downed. The taxi driver talked about a cover up. The list goes on and on.

Major General Albert "Bert" N. Stubblebine III, head of all intelligence says:

Pentagon NOT hit by a plane
WTC 7 brought down by explosives
Media in America is controlled

Albert "Bert" Newton Stubblebine III (born 1930) is a retired United States Army major general whose active duty career spanned 32 years. Beginning as an armor officer, he later transferred to intelligence. He is credited with redesigning the U.S. Army intelligence architecture during his time as commanding general of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) from 1981 to 1984, after which he retired from active service.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Stubblebine

[obsidian]

and saying "it doesnt seem to add up" whilst producing absolutely fuck all in the means of evidence is typical of tin foil hatters.

Arguing with people like you is like trying to convince this guy the world really isnt going to end.

As I said before, believing the official 911 "Story" makes you a tin foil hatter. That is where we stand today. So please take off your tin foil hat.

[Ropo]

Meltdown.

It is a lot easier to say that, than try to answer any questions I have asked. Why it is always like this? I ask you to prove the explosions, your answer is just utter bullshit not even close to subject. Do you think that people can't see that you are avoiding to give any answers, because you don't have any? Don't you realize that it is just fucking obvious that you guys can't prove any of your claims at all, and you prove it your self by doing what you do? Do you understand how fucking fool you look because you do that, because it is just so fucking clear that you are just a moron who has blind faith for the foil hat bullshit, but not enough brains to find an answer even the simplest questions.

[Ropo]

WTC7 was imploded just like the other ones.  Jet fuel does not melt steel.  You are either delusional or a paid government shill.

So you are just so fucking stupid that you don't see the difference? Well, that explains a lot of your behavior. You are full of shit and you prove it by yourself, because you don't have any evidence to prove any of those claims you present above.

1. WTC7 was imploded just like the other ones = no it didn't. Just prove that there were even one explosion, I dare you, you fucking moron.
2. Jet fuel does not melt steel. = no it doesn't and no one but foil hats has ever claimed it does. But what it does, it start to fire which heat up the steel, and when steel is hot, it loses it's structural strength. This is just a handbook physics, you can look it up anywhere. This reaction starts at the 200°C and at the 800°C 70% of the strength has gone. There was no melted steel, there is no evidence what so ever about the melted steel, it is all some foil hat nonsense.
3. What government would pay money to the finnish blockhead for calling foil hats to morons what they are? How fucking stupid you have to be just to invent something so stupid to claim? You are 1" away from the permanent placement in some mental institute, because your stupidity is impossible without serious mental handicap.