Author Topic: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?  (Read 212842 times)

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #225 on: April 23, 2016, 11:05:33 PM »
Ropo you are a stupid phaggot.

Stop talking.

Thank you, great argument, sir. What I still wonder is why arguments like this, while it would be lot better to present the evidences about the explosions which you guys so eagerly talk. Why that isn't even an option in this kind of conversation? When you start to make arguments like that you prove only your own stupidity, and I have prove it already plenty of times, so why don't you even try to prove something else for a change? Like those fairytales which you blindly believe, how about that? Why don't you prove that it is possible to detonate hundred of kilos of explosives inside the building without breaking the windows? Those core columns were massive, weight 1.2 tons per meter in that height, so how exactly you blow them to pieces without breaking the windows only 20 meter away from the columns? Why don't you explain that rather than calling me names? Is there any other reason than this: YOU CAN'T. So if I am stupid phaggot, I am still more clever than you, because I can make the questions you cannot answer  ;D

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #226 on: April 23, 2016, 11:09:53 PM »
What part does ropo the retarded inbreed does not understand that the official report is a conspiracy theory in it self, dummy. It is becoming clear  this person is working with an agenda most likely paid by somebody, and sooner or later he will be buried here, hopefully ban.

 Another fact which is not a conspiracy is that congress spent more money investigating Bill Clinton having his dindong suck by a whore than they spent investigating the biggest terrorist attack on our homeland and the biggest failure of government, AND spent much less time investigating the dead of 3000 people than what they have spent investigating the dead of 3 people with Benghazi.. Let that sink in for a minute.

But hey, government conspiracy reports must be  true, like back in the 60's with the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.

As long you guys can't prove any of your claims about the matter, all that is just bullshit from the mind of the imbecile. Start proving that there were even one real explosion at  the 9/11 attack. Just one, do you understand? 1 ? Pretty pretty please, be so kind and prove it? It has been 15 years an no one has presented the evidence about the explosions, and that proves that you are just full of shit.

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #227 on: April 23, 2016, 11:31:38 PM »
The official investigation claims an airplane flew into the Pentagon. Yet the only video available clearly indicates it was a missile. You don't think this is cause for concern? Just a little detail that's wrong??



That statement itself is the best evidence of your stupidity, because only drooling moron  could say something as idiotic like that. That sec cam takes one shot per  second, so if you don't see the plane, which is travelling 900kmh /560 mph = 250 meters per second aka 820 feet per second, how can you say it has to be missile? And what missile? 12 feet long cruise missile, which carry all of the kerosene to make that fireball, meaning tons of it? How this kind of speed would look like in the camera like that?  A flash, just like you see. You, like any of us can't see shit in that video, because it's quality is crap, and this is a fact. Still there is tons of evidences which prove that there were an aeroplane which hit the building. Tons of evidence, and thousands of eyewitnesses who saw the plane, some of them saw even the faces in the windows of the plane. This is the fact, until you have some kind of evidence which proves it isn't.


BigFin78

  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #228 on: April 23, 2016, 11:32:57 PM »

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #229 on: April 24, 2016, 12:06:14 AM »
The only moron that is blind is you Ropo. First of all, your grammar sucks. Learn to speak English.

Where is the plane? Why is the lawn so nice after a plane plowed into the building at ground level? Hint: It was not a plane







And when there is no doubt that you are a moron, you show even more idiotic claims?  How these idiotic clips and the picture overrule all of those tons of real evidence, ever eyewitness and piece of evidence? Plowing the lawn is just another foil hat claim without any evidence at all, because it didn't happen.

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #230 on: April 24, 2016, 12:33:55 AM »
I know that's not a plane. The plane would have been visible in even 1 frame. The grass lawn was undisturbed even though the plane supposedly entered on the first level. Witnesses saw an aircraft fly over them and they were not near the light poles that were downed. The taxi driver talked about a cover up. The list goes on and on.

Major General Albert "Bert" N. Stubblebine III, head of all intelligence says:

Pentagon NOT hit by a plane
WTC 7 brought down by explosives
Media in America is controlled

Albert "Bert" Newton Stubblebine III (born 1930) is a retired United States Army major general whose active duty career spanned 32 years. Beginning as an armor officer, he later transferred to intelligence. He is credited with redesigning the U.S. Army intelligence architecture during his time as commanding general of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) from 1981 to 1984, after which he retired from active service.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Stubblebine



And how do you know it? try to explain that, while it is a fact that camera is filming 1 frame per second, and the plane moves 250 meters(4 times it's lenght) in that time?

Do you have a smartphone with the camera? Next time when your daddy takes you to ride with his car, tell him to drive as fast as his car goes, and press your phone against the side window, and try take a picture of the mailboxes at the side of the road. You will see that you have no success, because even the speed of the car is too much to modern camera, if you don't use the flash to stop the movement. So how about this security camera from the 2001? As you see, those post's what it is filming are clear, like it is meant to be, because camera is there for incoming cars, not for the incoming planes.

And yet again, there is this "Albert the insane geek" giving statements which doesn't mean anything. He is presenting his opinion, he doesn't have any more evidence to show than average foil hat idiot have. What we know about the Albert? Let see..."Albert "Bert" N. Stubblebine III is a retired Major General in the United States Army with an interest in parapsychology. In fact, he is a proponent of psychic warfare, and was himself involved in MKULTRA and U.S. military projects to create “a breed of 'super soldier'” who would “have the ability to become invisible at will and to walk through walls”. Stubblebine was apparently among the people who tried to walk through walls without noticeable success. In fact, Stubblebine was responsible for getting loads of money poured into what he claimed to be reasonable projects. He is currently heartily insane, but seems to have been batshit crazy even before he tried to walk through walls. For instance, he gave a “Lecture on Remote Viewing as a Research Tool” at the International Symposium on UFO Research in 1982 (you can find it here: “Technical Remote Viewing is the trained ability to acquire accurate direct knowledge of things and events – targets – distant in time or space, in the past, present, or future, while conscious awareness remains totally ‘blind’ to details about the target itself”). He is known to have arranged numerous “spoon-bending parties” (think Uri Geller). After an incident involving an officer who had a “psychotic episode” at the Monroe Institute, however, Stubblebine resigned as head of Army intelligence.At least it got him a prominent place in the book (later movie) “Men Who Stare at Goats”. The title of the book comes from one of the talents Stubblebine hoped to inculcate in his “Warrior Monks”: the ability to kill goats by staring at them." - Encyclopedia of American Loons

So your author seem to be quite an ordinary lunatic, just as all other foil hat idiots are? What a surprise  ;D

obsidian

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7474
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #231 on: April 24, 2016, 12:35:42 AM »
And when there is no doubt that you are a moron, you show even more idiotic claims?  How these idiotic clips and the picture overrule all of those tons of real evidence, ever eyewitness and piece of evidence? Plowing the lawn is just another foil hat claim without any evidence at all, because it didn't happen.
Ropoo, please lay off the drugs. You need to get that tin foil hat off - you are a complete moron. In fact, it would be nice if someone impaled you for your stupidity (no homo)

Stop with your foil hat claims about a plane flying into the Pentagon. Are you crazy? That never happened. A video came out and a plane is clearly not visible. A Major General said a plane did not hit. Yet you still believe in that tin foil hat theory of yours! Get the fuck out of here with your conspiracy theories.

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #232 on: April 24, 2016, 12:40:30 AM »
Ropo typing like a fiend, melting, with each and every keystroke painting himself a severe 'tard.

And this severe 'tard make questions too difficult to you to answer, so what that tell about your intelligence? You are dumber than severe 'tard? Instead calling me names, why don't you try to prove something else than your stupidity? Those explosions for example?? Why that is out of the question? Why it isn't even an option, why it doesn't ever happen? Are you really so stupid that you don't realize that your lack of evidence and arguments proves what moron you are?

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #233 on: April 24, 2016, 12:44:37 AM »
As I said before, believing the official 911 "Story" makes you a tin foil hatter. That is where we stand today. So please take off your tin foil hat.

As long you morons can't prove shit, it make no fucking difference what you said, because you are just another moron with blind faith. You are child, not able to use your so called "brains" to figure out even simplest things, like impossibility to explode tons of explosive without even smashing the windows  ;D 

obsidian

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7474
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #234 on: April 24, 2016, 12:48:47 AM »
That statement itself is the best evidence of your stupidity, because only drooling moron  could say something as idiotic like that. That sec cam takes one shot per  second, so if you don't see the plane, which is travelling 900kmh /560 mph = 250 meters per second aka 820 feet per second, how can you say it has to be missile? And what missile? 12 feet long cruise missile, which carry all of the kerosene to make that fireball, meaning tons of it? How this kind of speed would look like in the camera like that?  A flash, just like you see. You, like any of us can't see shit in that video, because it's quality is crap, and this is a fact. Still there is tons of evidences which prove that there were an aeroplane which hit the building. Tons of evidence, and thousands of eyewitnesses who saw the plane, some of them saw even the faces in the windows of the plane. This is the fact, until you have some kind of evidence which proves it isn't.



They saw a decoy plane which flew over the Pentagon. The plane would have been visible in these frames even at the speed it was traveling and it is debatable how fast that was. Many witnesses have been interviewed and their positioning of the plane's location contradicts the BS official story.

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #235 on: April 24, 2016, 12:57:31 AM »


What a crap. Here is on real explosion for you:



Can you see the difference? These road side bombs are usually a pile of artillery grenades, so what detonates there is something like 30-50 kilos of the explosives. The pressure wave moves kilometers per second, and blast cloud expand with that same speed covering hundreds of meters in one flash. Even the camera start to wobble at the same time, and it is half a mile from the explosion. WTC towers have the footprint of 62 x 62 meters, and blasting those massive core columns you need to use hundred of kilos of explosives: No pressure wave, no blast clowd  and the windows which are 20 meters away from the blast, doesn't break at all? How anyone on this earth could be so stupid that he believe that crap?

Simple Simon

  • Guest
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #236 on: April 24, 2016, 01:01:00 AM »
What a crap. Here is on real explosion for you:



Can you see the difference? These road side bombs are usually a pile of artillery grenades, so what detonates there is something like 30-50 kilos of the explosives. The pressure wave moves kilometers per second, and blast cloud expand with that same speed covering hundreds of meters in one flash. Even the camera start to wobble at the same time, and it is half a mile from the explosion. WTC towers have the footprint of 62 x 62 meters, and blasting those massive core columns you need to use hundred of kilos of explosives: No pressure wave, no blast clowd  and the windows which are 20 meters away from the blast, doesn't break at all? How anyone on this earth could be so stupid that he believe that crap?

I would hang it up mate, these guys cant see reason , they just want to pretend they are "in the know" even though they have no idea what it is they "know"

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #237 on: April 24, 2016, 01:06:02 AM »
They saw a decoy plane which flew over the Pentagon. The plane would have been visible in these frames even at the speed it was traveling and it is debatable how fast that was. Many witnesses have been interviewed and their positioning of the plane's location contradicts the BS official story.


I have to ask even I know already your answer: Why no one have seen this ""decoy plane" after it fly over the pentagon at the height of few hundred feet's? It fly over the fucking town, and no one has seen it? When passenger jet fly just over the rooftops it is impossible to miss, because it makes sound louder than 150 decibel. So it fly over the pentagon and vanish in the thin air? Typical foil hat claim with no sense at all.. ;D

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #238 on: April 24, 2016, 01:09:20 AM »
I would hang it up mate, these guys cant see reason , they just want to pretend they are "in the know" even though they have no idea what it is they "know"

Well, that is the whole point of this: to make clear to these idiots that they pretend, while they know I am right. In some point they have to admit it to themselves, and hopefully they slice their wrist because of the shame ;D

Simple Simon

  • Guest
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #239 on: April 24, 2016, 01:19:37 AM »
They saw a decoy plane which flew over the Pentagon. The plane would have been visible in these frames even at the speed it was traveling and it is debatable how fast that was. Many witnesses have been interviewed and their positioning of the plane's location contradicts the BS official story.
so the townsfolk can recognise a decoy plane?
Tell me, what does a decoy plane look like?

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #240 on: April 24, 2016, 01:52:42 AM »
so the townsfolk can recognise a decoy plane?
Tell me, what does a decoy plane look like?

It is just like the real one, but it is a fake  ;D

FitnessFrenzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29212
  • faux pas
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #241 on: April 24, 2016, 01:56:35 AM »

2scared2post

  • Guest
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #242 on: April 24, 2016, 02:34:11 AM »
Ropo devastating minds in this thread.


Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #243 on: April 24, 2016, 02:36:42 AM »
So there is this guy, standing an watching the lawn...

Large picture, so I use the links: https://publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/DM-SD-02-03885.jpeg

At the right you see the fence which has hole in it, and at the left you see a car behind the fire truck. Lets look  closer:

Right side https://publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/DM-SD-02-03890.jpeg

You see that it is evident that the hole has been punched by something large going towards the building.

Left side https://publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/DM-SD-02-03896.jpeg

When you look at the burning car, you see part of the fence above it, pointing towards the building. There is 30-40 meters between these two parts of fence, and these foil hats are saying that missile made all that?

Well, ok. Lets look closer: https://publicintelligence.net/911-pentagon-damage-immediate-aftermath-high-resolution-photos/

There is one common factor in all photos on that page, because if you look carefully, you can't see any bricks, any furniture etc. anything which has been inside the building, and fly out from it by the force of explosion. Instead of that, in every photo you look, it is easy to see that there has been massive movement inward and toward the building. Please explain to me how this could be exploded missile, while it doesn't make any kind of damage by exploding? It is evident that what you see is damages made by penetration and fire, not by the explosion. In fact it is lot easier to find parts of aero plane from them, because there is lot of tiny aluminum particles all over the yard and also bigger parts are visible.

https://publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/DM-SD-02-03896.jpeg  What is under the spray of water? Part of the aileron? Wall of the fuselage?
https://publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/DM-SD-02-03905.jpeg  What is in the forefront? Part of the inner structure of the wings?
https://publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/DM-SD-02-03900.jpeg  What would  be that thing at the down left, which has three holes in it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missiles_by_country Please show me the missile which would do damages like that?

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #244 on: April 24, 2016, 02:46:16 AM »
Ropo devastating minds in this thread.



Reality is far more interesting, than these fucking fairy tales of the foil hat morons. They really are like a flock of lambs, they walk this same circle round after round, year after year never doing anything else than repeating words they have heard, but never bother to think them through. And this is what they call "thinking with their own brains"? It seem to me that they don't even have any brains, because they are believing things which simply cannot happen in reality  ;D

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24652
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #245 on: April 24, 2016, 03:43:13 AM »
and saying "it doesnt seem to add up" whilst producing absolutely fuck all in the means of evidence is typical of tin foil hatters.

Arguing with people like you is like trying to convince this guy the world really isnt going to end.








Really - Please try harder. You are showing yourself up.
Clearly you are unable to offer clear answers.

Just moronic non definitive posts, trying to insult people.
Very Clever.. ::) Not.

Simple Simon

  • Guest
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #246 on: April 24, 2016, 04:32:40 AM »





Really - Please try harder. You are showing yourself up.
Clearly you are unable to offer clear answers.

Just moronic non definitive posts, trying to insult people.
Very Clever.. ::) Not.


answers to what?
Your unfounded allegations and ludicrous opinions of what you think happened.

Post some evidence of what you believe happened and we can discuss it.
The absence of evidence isn't actually evidence you know?

Mr Anabolic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10647
  • Better to die on your feet than on your knees.
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #247 on: April 24, 2016, 05:19:10 AM »
This Ropo character is a mindless vassal.  He cannot believe his own eyes.  His total ignorance of science and physics is astounding.  It's a complete waste of time replying to him.  All he does here make lame attempts to debunk conspiracy factualists. 

Simple Simon

  • Guest
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #248 on: April 24, 2016, 05:47:30 AM »
This Ropo character is a mindless vassal.  He cannot believe his own eyes.  His total ignorance of science and physics is astounding.  It's a complete waste of time replying to him.  All he does here make lame attempts to debunk conspiracy factualists. 

Would you care explain what happened on 9/11 and provide evidence to back up those claims?

Saying "it doesn't look right" wont be accepted as an explanation or evidence.

Mr Anabolic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10647
  • Better to die on your feet than on your knees.
Re: rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?
« Reply #249 on: April 24, 2016, 07:34:27 AM »
Would you care explain what happened on 9/11 and provide evidence to back up those claims?

Saying "it doesn't look right" wont be accepted as an explanation or evidence.

There is plenty of evidence, do your own research.  People like you will never consider the evidence anyway because your mind is already made up.