rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?

[OzmO]

Where were the 2 humongous engines?  Since when does a jet fuselage penetrate 4 rings of the pentagon?  If there is no debris from the plane and it just evaporated, how did it penetrate 4 rings of the Pentagon?  Impossible..  Cruise missile with a penetrating warhead.  The hole in the Pentagon starts at the base, on the ground... How did the plane get that low without the engines hitting the ground?  Physically impossible.  The engines would have hit the ground causing the plane to crash before it reached the Pentagon's outer wall.  This all assuming the plane could maneuver that low at that speed, which again was physically impossible.  This is shit any 6th grader knows.  My God wake up people...

wrong again.  

This shows you have the understanding of a 6th grader or less.  I would expect a 6th grader to believe non sense like this.

You know nothing about what airliners are made of.
You know nothing of what happens when a jet hits a solid object such as the ground or a solid object
You know nothing of how an airliner can or cannot maneuver

You are straight talking out of your ass.

The funny part about this is all the information you need to know is easily found on the web.

But your 6th grade intellect tells you cruise missile hit the pentagon.

 

[OzmO]

Believes a discussion of how the WTC failed didn't precede a study of how to make them with stand a terrorist attack like 9/11

What kind of stupid is this man?

[OzmO]

Ozmo in the OWNED Zone, has not debunked anything, nor has presented anything here, Facts.

Gets trolled, but too stupid to understand it, Facts.

Comes here and proclaims there are discussion and studies at colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11 which can not provide any proof or links, and he gives a link not related to what he posts but too stupid to understand it, Fatcs.

Ozmo "The legend on his own mind" Government dick rider's logic 101

That's what you have been doing this whole time.  You get exposed and you run like a coward.

You haven't owned anything except the youtube monkey award.

You run from:

Fact:  Bush wasn't talking about WTC's being pre-wired with explosives
Fact:  it wasn't 19 goat shephards
Fact:  There are discussions and studies art colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11

Because you are a scared.

[Dave D]

Can you imagine these people in a court of law?

"What evidence do you have against the accused?"

"Do your own research, its all out there"

LOL like getbig is a courtroom.  It doesn't matter what you believe someone else will believe the opposite.

[Dave D]

There is nothing interesting in that video to see, so why don't you stop linking that crap? I have seen these collapses thousands of times, and I know that there isn't any explosions in them, because all the evidence what you should see  is missing. That building was only 62 yards wide, so any fucking amount of explosives more than grams would be clearly visible. Your problem is that you don't know what the real explosions look like, even I have give you lot of examples, and that could mean only one thing: your blind faith overpower all facts, no matter how evident they are. You can scream, you can cry, but you never will be able to prove there were explosives, because there isn't any evidence at all to prove that. That video proves your stupidity, because that is one of the many which proves that even the sound of explosion is missing. You hear only how the building crumble on its way down, but all loud bangs are missing?  I show you a video where were dozens of controlled demolitions, and there can't be any mistakes about the sound of explosives, and the cloud they make. What do you think it will sound when 400 meters high tower collapse WITHOUT any explosions? Look from your video  

Finland isn't a superpower at any means, but at least we have a brains and the government which isn't killing us with any given reason, or just an amusement. Our school system is superior compared to yours, you can ask about it from Michael Moore, who visited here making a movie about it. We don't have metal detectors on our schools, because we don't need them, our children's go there for learning, not to take drugs and kill each others for fun. If you would be living here, that mental illness of yours would be treated with no charge at all, and some day you would be on the same line with the rest of the mankind, not with the apes like you are now  

Ropo you're a good dude and you've presented your evidence and made your points. I can't fault you for any of that.


BUT using Micheal Moore as a source for any opinion is a poor decision. Very few schools in the states have metal detectors, I get it that it shouldn't be an issue at all, but it's not like that's a way of life for 95% of the population.

[M4tad0r]

You haven't owned anything except the youtube monkey award.

You run from:

Fact:  Bush wasn't talking about WTC's being pre-wired with explosives
Fact:  it wasn't 19 goat shephards
Fact:  There are discussions and studies art colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11

Because you are a scared.

Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: Doesn't present any studies or facts where WTC failed on 9/11.

[M4tad0r]

wrong again.  

This shows you have the understanding of a 6th grader or less.  I would expect a 6th grader to believe non sense like this.

You know nothing about what airliners are made of.
You know nothing of what happens when a jet hits a solid object such as the ground or a solid object
You know nothing of how an airliner can or cannot maneuver

You are straight talking out of your ass.

The funny part about this is all the information you need to know is easily found on the web.

But your 6th grade intellect tells you cruise missile hit the pentagon.

 

Ozmo in the OWNED Zone, has not debunked anything, nor has presented anything here, Facts.

Gets trolled, but too stupid to understand it, Facts.

Comes here and proclaims there are discussion and studies at colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11 which can not provide any proof or links, and he gives a link not related to what he posts but too stupid to understand it, Fatcs.

Ozmo "The legend on his own mind" Government dick rider's logic 101

That's what you have been doing this whole time.  You get exposed and you run like a coward.

You are a fraud and a coward.  Man up or shut up.

[Colossus_1986]

Fuck off with that stereotypical tin foil hatter response, just post links to your fucking evidence you lame twat.

"Do your own research" generally translates has "I haven't got a fucking clue, see if you can find it"

Do your own research means actually sit down and listen to both sides of the argument.

Everyone knows the CNN, NBC and CBS reports. We all saw the news. Everyone know that account. We've all been subject to endless loops of video on the news, and you take that as the absolute truth and thats it... You owe it to yourself to visit the other side of the argument. I once thought it was inconceivable to think some of the things people say about the events on that day, but once you actually listen to the details of just a 45 minute breakdown, you see how much information was withed, or just impossible.

Fact of the matter is, so many points are contradicted, and well laid out in various documentaries... Simply criticizing someone because they can't put it into words, and you're too lazy to look at well made documentary is just plain stupid. Even in the court of law, both parties are given equal times to state their case. Give both sides a shot. Not me, not Matador, or others making claims here. I'm not saying you should believe my analysis, I can't summarize the things i've seen just WATCH a properly structured documentary and try not to smoke meth that morning with your trailer park friends and some new things will be made aware to you.

If you haven't listened to the arguments of the qualified professionals who contradict the official story, and you simply dismiss them; the fault is all yours for not being educated on the subject.

I've watched a handful of documentaries, and this one here (not finished yet) is insanely in-depth, and if you only take 10% of the points they bring up, you'll see how the events of 9/11 (what's officially on record / hidden from record) are fabricated like a house of cards.

HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS: (Available in youtube in 3 parts) or 1 long video of nearly 4.5 hours. The first 1.5 hours will be enough to have you interested, and that's not even covering the WTC yet.



Even NIST (National Institute of Standards and Tech) - the guys who claim that steel didn't need to melt, it just needed to be weakened, doesn't even acknowledge having a recorded temperature that is even close enough to do so. See the 3 temps below (Temp required to melt, soften, an the officially temperature NIST says occurred in the WTC...) This is like 1/50 points that are brought up in this documentary, it's nuts to conceive that such bullshit made it through in the official reports as plausible causes for the way the events happened...

[M4tad0r]

911-Conspiracy Finally Solved!: Names, Connections, Motives, 911Matrix of Details Exposed!

[M4tad0r]

911 Investigators and Witnesses are Being Killed!.mp4

[M4tad0r]

Former FBI chief Ted Gundersen says 9/11 was an inside job

[chaos]

Do your own research means actually sit down and listen to both sides of the argument.

Everyone knows the CNN, NBC and CBS reports. We all saw the news. Everyone know that account. We've all been subject to endless loops of video on the news, and you take that as the absolute truth and thats it... You owe it to yourself to visit the other side of the argument. I once thought it was inconceivable to think some of the things people say about the events on that day, but once you actually listen to the details of just a 45 minute breakdown, you see how much information was withed, or just impossible.

Fact of the matter is, so many points are contradicted, and well laid out in various documentaries... Simply criticizing someone because they can't put it into words, and you're too lazy to look at well made documentary is just plain stupid. Even in the court of law, both parties are given equal times to state their case. Give both sides a shot. Not me, not Matador, or others making claims here. I'm not saying you should believe my analysis, I can't summarize the things i've seen just WATCH a properly structured documentary and try not to smoke meth that morning with your trailer park friends and some new things will be made aware to you.

If you haven't listened to the arguments of the qualified professionals who contradict the official story, and you simply dismiss them; the fault is all yours for not being educated on the subject.

I've watched a handful of documentaries, and this one here (not finished yet) is insanely in-depth, and if you only take 10% of the points they bring up, you'll see how the events of 9/11 (what's officially on record / hidden from record) are fabricated like a house of cards.

HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS: (Available in youtube in 3 parts) or 1 long video of nearly 4.5 hours. The first 1.5 hours will be enough to have you interested, and that's not even covering the WTC yet.



Even NIST (National Institute of Standards and Tech) - the guys who claim that steel didn't need to melt, it just needed to be weakened, doesn't even acknowledge having a recorded temperature that is even close enough to do so. See the 3 temps below (Temp required to melt, soften, an the officially temperature NIST says occurred in the WTC...) This is like 1/50 points that are brought up in this documentary, it's nuts to conceive that such bullshit made it through in the official reports as plausible causes for the way the events happened...

Weird you would post that pic when the NIST website actually says the fires were as hot as 1800f.
Which is it?

http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtctowers.cfm

Point #6 if you bother to look.
Here let me just quote it for you........

6. What caused the collapses of WTC 1 and WTC 2?

Based on its comprehensive investigation, NIST concluded that the WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large number of jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires (which reached temperatures as high as 1,000 degrees Celsius, or 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) significantly weakened the floors and columns with dislodged fireproofing to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns. This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers. Both photographic and video evidence—as well as accounts from the New York City Police Department aviation unit during a half-hour period prior to collapse—support this sequence for each tower.

[M4tad0r]

9/11 Incontrovertible Proof the Government is Lying

&feature=youtu.be

8 weeks after the buildings came down, there were still fires going on under the ruble!!!

[illuminati]

Quote from: illuminati on 07-05-2016, 23:39:40

I'll give you that your are Good with the cut-n-paste etc with your answers.

What am I Afraid Of -- A Few Things Actually.
Though Certainly NOT YOU.

Is All You Can Do Is Resort To Imbecile Name Calling.
That is a Clue To A Very Educated & Intelligent Man...NOT.

I Have Said Already I Don't Know How The American Defense System Worked Back Then or in fact now.

The Simple Fact That 2 planes Hit The Twin Towers. ( Granted that would of Been very tough to prevent )
And 2 others -- 1, Brought down by the passengers, & The other Smashes into The Pentagon, Which they Clearly had enough time to track it's flight path & Try to communicate With.

I think Most Sane Rational Thinking People Would Say Was A Faliure Of A Defense System.
The Clue Is In The Words 'DEFENCE SYSTEMS'  
Hmm Let The Plane Smash into One of The Most Important Buildings In America & Do Fcuk All About.
Great Defense System.  Roll Eyes


Now Go Away --
Pls Feel Free to Call Me all the Childish Names You want.
And Show yourself up for what you are Some More.  Wink









Quote - Matador.

I am not going away.   Maybe you should smarten up.  Its not my fault you can't handle your own ignorance what its revealed to you.

You don't know how the defense system worked back then BUT you know enough to suggest they should have stopped it?

The above is very indicative of CT'ers in general.

 Roll Eyes








To You Matador.

Re - read my post to you & Take It In.

No I don't claim to know how it worked or works.

Again The Clue Is In The NAME --DEFENCE SYSTEMS --

Letting A Plane Smash into one of the supposedly Most Secured & Important Buildings
Is Not A Very Good Defence System.

At Least This Post You Managed To Not Show Yourself Up Again With Imbecile Name Calling.

I will Refrain From Answering Any Further Posts From You.
As You Won't Go Away.
Is Best I Just Ignore You.

P.s do try to be more mature in your replies to posters
You May Just Convince a few you are the Expert & Intelligent Man you so
Desperately try to portray.

HTH.
 

[OzmO]

Quote from: illuminati on 07-05-2016, 23:39:40

I'll give you that your are Good with the cut-n-paste etc with your answers.

What am I Afraid Of -- A Few Things Actually.
Though Certainly NOT YOU.

Is All You Can Do Is Resort To Imbecile Name Calling.
That is a Clue To A Very Educated & Intelligent Man...NOT.

I Have Said Already I Don't Know How The American Defense System Worked Back Then or in fact now.

The Simple Fact That 2 planes Hit The Twin Towers. ( Granted that would of Been very tough to prevent )
And 2 others -- 1, Brought down by the passengers, & The other Smashes into The Pentagon, Which they Clearly had enough time to track it's flight path & Try to communicate With.

I think Most Sane Rational Thinking People Would Say Was A Faliure Of A Defense System.
The Clue Is In The Words 'DEFENCE SYSTEMS'  
Hmm Let The Plane Smash into One of The Most Important Buildings In America & Do Fcuk All About.
Great Defense System.  Roll Eyes


Now Go Away --
Pls Feel Free to Call Me all the Childish Names You want.
And Show yourself up for what you are Some More.  Wink









Quote - Matador.

I am not going away.   Maybe you should smarten up.  Its not my fault you can't handle your own ignorance what its revealed to you.

You don't know how the defense system worked back then BUT you know enough to suggest they should have stopped it?

The above is very indicative of CT'ers in general.

 Roll Eyes








To You Matador.

Re - read my post to you & Take It In.

No I don't claim to know how it worked or works.

Again The Clue Is In The NAME --DEFENCE SYSTEMS --

Letting A Plane Smash into one of the supposedly Most Secured & Important Buildings
Is Not A Very Good Defence System.

At Least This Post You Managed To Not Show Yourself Up Again With Imbecile Name Calling.

I will Refrain From Answering Any Further Posts From You.
As You Won't Go Away.
Is Best I Just Ignore You.

P.s do try to be more mature in your replies to posters
You May Just Convince a few you are the Expert & Intelligent Man you so
Desperately try to portray.

HTH.
 

In addition to not knowing the how our defense system worked that day, you also don't know how to use the "quote" feature on this forum today.

Perhaps you can ask a 6th grader to help you.

In the meantime do you have anything of substance to back up any of your absurd claims?

Thank Fcuk it wasn't Russia or China launching a Stealth Attack on America That Day
Chances are you'd be speaking another language now.

Still can't back up what you can you?

This is something a 6th grader would say.

[OzmO]

Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: Doesn't present any studies or facts where WTC failed on 9/11.

So now you are claiming trolled when you still cant address your failures?

A truffer is one sad desperate monkey.

[OzmO]

Do your own research means actually sit down and listen to both sides of the argument.

I have, I was truffer at first.   The enthusiasm to legitimately prove it was an "inside job" led to the conclusion truffer arguments are rubbish.

If you haven't listened to the arguments of the qualified professionals who contradict the official story, and you simply dismiss them; the fault is all yours for not being educated on the subject.

Haven't seen any "qualified professionals" submit a peer reviewed science based argument that refutes findings from the official report or from professors at places like MIT, Northwestern and Purdue universities. (been saving those for your youtube monkey cohort, but he can't even admit that a discussion on how the WTC collapsed preceded a study on how they can make buildings safer from terrorist attack like 9/11)

I've watched a handful of documentaries, and this one here (not finished yet) is insanely in-depth, and if you only take 10% of the points they bring up, you'll see how the events of 9/11 (what's officially on record / hidden from record) are fabricated like a house of cards.

HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS: (Available in youtube in 3 parts) or 1 long video of nearly 4.5 hours. The first 1.5 hours will be enough to have you interested, and that's not even covering the WTC yet.

Most youtube 9/11 vids are final cut "slapped togethers with dramatic music."  They are designed to sway you with rhetorical questions based on false premises.

Research from credible sources will give you tangible arguments for or against.

Even NIST (National Institute of Standards and Tech) - the guys who claim that steel didn't need to melt, it just needed to be weakened, doesn't even acknowledge having a recorded temperature that is even close enough to do so. See the 3 temps below (Temp required to melt, soften, an the officially temperature NIST says occurred in the WTC...) This is like 1/50 points that are brought up in this documentary, it's nuts to conceive that such bullshit made it through in the official reports as plausible causes for the way the events happened...

Not BS at all, and credible sources have supported the official report in their own research, people with direct expertise in the related fields.

[OzmO]

6. What caused the collapses of WTC 1 and WTC 2?

Based on its comprehensive investigation, NIST concluded that the WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large number of jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires (which reached temperatures as high as 1,000 degrees Celsius, or 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) significantly weakened the floors and columns with dislodged fireproofing to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns. This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers. Both photographic and video evidence—as well as accounts from the New York City Police Department aviation unit during a half-hour period prior to collapse—support this sequence for each tower.

In ancient times an uneducated mind called science witchcraft or divine intervention

In modern times an uneducated mind calls science Bullshit or a CT.

[M4tad0r]

I have, I was truffer at first.   The enthusiasm to legitimately prove it was an "inside job" led to the conclusion truffer arguments are rubbish.


Haven't seen any "qualified professionals" submit a peer reviewed science based argument that refutes findings from the official report or from professors at places like MIT, Northwestern and Purdue universities. (been saving those for your youtube monkey cohort, but he can't even admit that a discussion on how the WTC collapsed preceded a study on how they can make buildings safer from terrorist attack like 9/11)


Most youtube 9/11 vids are final cut "slapped togethers with dramatic music."  They are designed to sway you with rhetorical questions based on false premises.

Research from credible sources will give you tangible arguments for or against.

Not BS at all, and credible sources have supported the official report in their own research, people with direct expertise in the related fields.

Ozmo 'the American' full of rubbish & "the legend on his own mind" Government dick rider's logic 101

Ozmo in the OWNED Zone, has not debunked anything, nor has presented anything here, Facts.

Gets trolled, but too stupid to understand it, Facts.

Comes here and proclaims there are discussion and studies at colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11 which can not provide any proof or links, and he gives a link not related to what he posts but too stupid to understand it, Fatcs.

That's what you have been doing this whole time.  You get exposed and you run like a coward!!!
 Man up or shut da fuck up!!!

It's just too easy for you to be:

[OzmO]

Ozmo 'the American' full of rubbish & "the legend on his own mind" Government dick rider's logic 101

Ozmo in the OWNED Zone, has not debunked anything, nor has presented anything here, Facts.

Gets trolled, but too stupid to understand it, Facts.

Comes here and proclaims there are discussion and studies at colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11 which can not provide any proof or links, and he gives a link not related to what he posts but too stupid to understand it, Fatcs.

That's what you have been doing this whole time.  You get exposed and you run like a coward!!!
 Man up or shut da fuck up!!!

It's just too easy for you to be:

 Still cant address your failures?

Fact:  Bush wasn't talking about WTC's being pre-wired with explosives
Fact:  it wasn't 19 goat shephards
Fact:  There are discussions and studies art colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11

A truffer is one sad desperate monkey.

[M4tad0r]

Still cant address your failures?

Fact:  Bush wasn't talking about WTC's being pre-wired with explosives
Fact:  it wasn't 19 goat shephards
Fact:  There are discussions and studies art colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11

A truffer is one sad desperate monkey.

Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: Doesn't present any studies or facts from colleges that studied why WTC's failed on 9/11.

Ozmo 'the American' full of rubbish & "the legend on his own mind" Government dick rider's logic 101 who studied the events of 9/11 for 9 years. HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHA.

Man up and shut da fuck up!!!

All you been doing is getting:

[OzmO]

Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: too stupid to understand when you are been trolled.
Fact: Doesn't present any studies or facts from colleges that studied why WTC's failed on 9/11.

Ozmo 'the American' full of rubbish & "the legend on his own mind" Government dick rider's logic 101 who studied the events of 9/11 for 9 years. HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHA.

Man up and shut da fuck up!!!

All you been doing is getting:

Still cant address your failures?

Fact:  Bush wasn't talking about WTC's being pre-wired with explosives
Fact:  it wasn't 19 goat shephards
Fact:  There are discussions and studies art colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11

A truffer is one sad desperate monkey.

[lilhawk1]

Fuck off with that stereotypical tin foil hatter response, just post links to your fucking evidence you lame twat.

"Do your own research" generally translates has "I haven't got a fucking clue, see if you can find it"

Why so hostile?  I at first believed the official story of 9/11 before I actually looked at the evidence.  I've read countless books, nobody told me to, I did it on my own..  Why can't you?  Instead you say fuck off.  Childlike response.  Everyone should be researching this because this event is the reason why we are still fighting wars today.  I've listed off a few books I have read, why don't you read them?  Too lazy?  It's impossible to list off every single thing I've read here, nor should I have to.  The information is everwhere, it's up to you to educate yourself.  Or, you can continue to hurl insults and act like a child here.  The evidence is overwhelming that our government did this... If you're too lazy to read, look no further than the controlled demolition of WTC 7.  That one piece of evidence confirms inside job... You're clearly the one that doesn't have a clue.  I might suggest you get one....

[OzmO]

You need to do some research.  Answer this smart guy:

Why we're thermite and nano-thermite found in the debris at WTC?  
Why did all 3 WTC buildings fall at near free fall speed, and actually accelerate as they fell?
Why did Silverstein say they pulled WTC 7? That's an admission it was demolished correct?
Why only one shitty camera angle of the Pentagon, the most protected building on earth?
Why did the FBI confiscate all security camera footage from businesses surrounding the Pentagon within minutes?
Why did George Bush say in an interview he saw the first plane hit the tower, when he was sitting in a classroom at the time?  He knew what was to happen that day that's why.
Why could our military not intercept a single jet that day when they had done so dozens of times that year?
Why no wreckage at Pentagon?
Why no wreckage at Shanksville?
Why did Rumsfeld slip up and say in an interview that a missile hit the Pentagon?
Why was the WTC debris rapidly sent to China?  Was it not a crime scene?
Why so little time and money spent on the investigation of the event that changed our world?
Why so many reports of explosions at WTC?
Why were there demolition squibs on the floors below the collapsing towers?
Why so much dust if no explosives were used?  

Read, do some research, I've listed off at least 2 books.. Why not read them?  The facts are all laid out.  Interviews with military, flight controllers, pilots, engineers, architects, etc.  instead you provide no evidence except the bullshit investigation, and resort to name calling.  Grow up.

At first glance all the stuff you wrote their not true.


I have been debunking 9/11 off and on for the last 9 years.  Chances are I have done far more actual research than you.   I have done independent research, and interviewed people who have expertise in fields related to 9/11.

I started out believing there might have been a CT here.  It didn't take long.  There is nothing even remotely credible to substantiate 9/11 truffer arguments.

So don't carried away thinking i haven't done any research.

I call people names because when i show them to be 100% wrong they run like bitches.

Exmaple: the youtube monkey


Fact:  Bush wasn't talking about WTC's being pre-wired with explosives
Fact:  it wasn't 19 goat shephards
Fact:  There are discussions and studies art colleges of why the WTCs failed on 9/11

Are you gonna run too?

Pic any part of it you want.  We could do easy ones like no wreckage at the pentagon or harder ones like the thermite argument.  Commit that you will stay on the part you pick until the bitter end and i will go round and round with as long as you like.  

(this shouldn't be too hard with all those books you read)

But understand this, the burden of proof is on you, the accuser.   Because the case has been made and main stream science agrees.

Run Forrest Run!

[lilhawk1]

I never said Bush talked about the towers being prewired... Learn to read..,I said he said in an interview he saw the first plane hit the tower, which was impossible because he was sitting in a classroom at the time... Come out of the dark ages and open your eyes,, more than half of Americans now believe our own government had a part in 9/11.  You don't debunk shit, and you can't prove shit because all you do is reiterate the official story, which everyone with a shred of intelligence knows is absolute bullshit..