The building was going to fall anyway? How did they know this? Is there some sort of internal computer system giving a count down to the collapse? Were there engineers with hard hats all over the flaming
building inspecting it and assessing that a collapse was imminent?
No one knew that's the point. It was mistaken report by BBC. Its a non issue because "if" they were going to demolish it anyway there would be no need to give BBC the report.
Of course the easy way out is to discredit people who are far more intelligent than you. University professors know less than you
No, its common sense and reality. The 99.9% of architects and engineers are saying so. Main stream science is saying so. In every field of science there are crack pots with degrees. The fact that not one good argument has been made by these crackpots that can be argued in a court to cause a motion to open a case has been made says it all. There is nothing tangible they have argued in 15 years. You don't need to be smart to figure this out.
Dust samples were examined, and thermitic materials were found
http://www.globalresearch.ca/active-thermitic-material-discovered-in-dust-from-the-9-11-world-trade-center-catastrophe/13049
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html
No what they found was iron micro spheres as evidence of thermite and those are present in WTC becuase Iron Micro-spheres form from condensed vaporized iron or from molten iron. You can melt iron by igniting it with a Bic lighter, if the pieces of iron are thin enough. There are several other sources of iron microspheres. Iron microspheres were expected in the WTC dust
WTC was a class 1A building, it was forbidden to have anything explosive or flammable in there. WTC was known to exceed the
regulations for fire safety imposed by the city. I'm not sure what "things" heated up and exploded in the building, other than devices in aiding to collapse the towers.
You have never seen a building burn. Things explode causing a loud pop that is common mistaken for a bomb going off. Such as: Hot water heater, Food storage containers with spoiled food, Light bulb, soda or beer bottles (i have done this camping, very loud), any C02 spray can, fire extinguishers, Boilers, cathode ray tubes (computer monitors) etc.
NORAD fighter jets for the northeastern USA were assembled in Canada for war-games, that coincidentally mimiced intercepting
hijacked passenger planes By the time NORAD was informed of the attacks, they were not clear as to if the request was real world or exercise.
How this whole thing transpired and why our air defense system was compromised is very complex.
holy fuck that's a good one!
What do you think was the resolution, frame rate and focal point of those cameras? That's why. Video isn't needed to prove a plane hit the pentagon.
That's pretty significant since they blamed HIM for the attacks, and began a war (still currently happening) based on this accusation.
Not in the context of the debate of whether or not the Pentagon was hit by a missile or the WTC were demolished.
When people who worked on this report (who are out to find the truth and lay out the facts) say that it was underfunded and set up to
fail, it's a sign that they did not want this thing to be thorough. Says a lot about having the story straight on the greatest attack on amercian soil ever.
I don't deny the possibility of some people being underfunded, but i do question whether it was for truther reasons. however there have been many other people in universities who have done their own analysis and provided their conclusions from MIT, Northwestern, purdue, etc. The problem here for truthers is that nothing tangible has ever been found.
Contingency plan? it's not a contingency plan when you're trying to stage, or encourage an attack for benefit of swaying public perception and go to war.
Contingent what ever would cause the need for this plan. Just because some loony tune made a plan like this and his co-horts who are also probably loony neo cons fell in line with it doesn't mean the Government commit the act. Point is there are plans for everything.
It's not classified, Rumsfeld said this on Television. Nobody asked about it after that...
I know its not classified, you don't think military does shit like this all the time?
Even if we disregard who was in charge of security, it's a known fact that the towers security systems were shut down for the entire weekend before the attacks. Both towers 1 and 2 were
in a blackout and people who work in the towers have confirmed this repeatedly. Not to mention bomb sniffing dogs were removed in the weeks before the attacks, and for extended periods of
time, select floors were blocked off with no access (stairs or elevators) and employees working below these floors reported very loud construction work, sawing, hammering, drilling
Not true, but enough to embellish that story the way you laid it out. They were receiving bomb threats prior to 9/11 and after a couple of weeks of bomb sniffing dogs combing the Building they were removed.
http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_bomb_sniffing_dogs.html And there were at least this dog there:
http://www.novareinna.com/bridge/sirius.htmlthe tower in Blackout on WTC 2 above floor 50 on 9/8-9 for a cabling upgrade by IT.
Because the official coroner said so. There was never a drop of blood, a bone or a shred of clothing or luggage to examine. IT was all over the news that they found "debris" many miles away that was supposedly
blown by the wind.
I am curious about this, maybe you have a link?
Fuel load was burned up mostly in the impact. The entire building had asbestos lining in the pipes, and all over steel framing. Asbestos is as effective
in being fire retardant, as it is toxic to humans, which is VERY effective.
the people who designed the building said they didn't take into account fuel load. "Leslie Robertson, one of the chief engineers working on the design of the World Trade Center, has since said he personally considered the scenario of the impact of a Boeing 707 or another jet airliner, which might be lost in the fog and flying at relatively low speeds while seeking to land at JFK Airport or Newark Airport. However, in an interview with the BBC, Robertson states, "with the 707, the fuel load was not considered in the design, I don't know how it could have been considered."[10][11]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_of_the_World_Trade_Center
