Then you would be an idiot. First of all, most AfAms aren't "robbing, stealing and on welfare."
Secondly, even if you are operating under the binary idea of "abominable" life in Africa vs easy street here in America, slavery was not the only option to get to America. The country was built on immigration. The idea that the horrific, centuries long slave trade was just collateral damage for being able to live in gov't housing is downright stupid.
As for blacks being appreciative?
America, as a whole, made out way better in the slavery deal than AfAm did.
The immoral acts and historical legacy of slavery can't be defended by any reasonable human being.
However, in my opinion, the Black Lives Matter folks, don't maintain focus on the key issues .
It is my observation that BLM swngs into action anytime a shooting incident takes place between a black man and a white cop. Yes, we have a small number of wrongful use of force by white cops in this country, some against blacks. For me, the main issues is BLM backing the black guy regardless of what he did .
For example, the guy who was shot in the arm in Minn ( and died) looks bad and needs to be fully investigated.
BLM should focus a lot more on defending decent, law abiding blacks with no criminal history instead of thugs with lengthy records. It's a hell of a lot more effective to defend polite decent people that get wronged by the police then those with criminal records resisting arrest!
With a few exceptions most of the men were involved in some form of criminal activity and that's why the cops were involved. I'm not saying we should defend every cop for using deadly force , but c'mon.
I felt the exact same way when I saw rebel white guys resisting arrest .
I got a lot of shit from my white friends, when I stated that Randy Weaver and Davd Korech got what they deserved. Both men barricaded in buildings , shot at law enforcement and refused to come out.
What else were the cops supposed to do, ignore the bullets? No!