Trump = Winning

[Primemuscle]

Yes, what he missed, like you (obviously) is that it was dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE not because of the merits (the Grand Jury found no issues with the evidence) of the indictment but because of a procedural error. It will likely be overturned on appeal and if not the case can be refiled and new indictments will be handed down. Aside from that, this was a Bill Clinton activist appointed judge.

All the judge did was buy Comey and James time for the inevitable. Since Lurker can’t think outside of a propaganda clickbait headline, this jackass was doing some sort a victory lap

Thanks for the information. To refile with new indictments looks like and uphill battle. What do you think the basis for a successful appeal would be?

The Department of Justice can appeal these rulings and could get them reversed on appeal, or it could refile them after a new U.S. attorney is named in accordance with law.

If Currie’s rulings stand, the Justice Department can’t just file the cases again, with Halligan still in this role, unless the Trump administration follows the procedures set forth in the law for her proper appointment.

It may be too late for the case against Comey, however, because the statute of limitations on those charges has already run out. As Currie noted in her Comey ruling, while the statute of limitations is generally suspended when a valid indictment has been filed, an invalid indictment, like the one against Comey, would not have the same effect on the statute of limitations.

https://theconversation.com/without-prejudice-what-this-2-word-legalese-means-for-the-dismissed-charges-against-james-comey-and-letitia-james-270559

On another note: The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a $1 million sanction against Trump and his lawyer Alina Habba for their frivolous conspiracy-laden racketeering lawsuit targeting Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and former FBI Director James Comey.

[Grape Ape]

Comey needs to be held accountable.

[LurkerNoMore]

The only reason you mentioned the appeal is because you had to go back and look it up to understand why you didn’t get it. But there you were doing your victory lap that always backfires.

If you actually understood what the ruling meant you might not have posted it….i take that back, you would have.

Wrong again retardo.  If the administration had anything other than shit for brains -like you- they would not have used a quack prosecutor in the first place.  You know all the "I hire the best people" crap and all that...   

When they appeal and it fails again what will your little excuse be?

[LurkerNoMore]

HHAAHAA.... so much winning.

Trumpy and another lawyer shows just what winning looks like.  For the other team that is. 

---
https://www.axios.com/2025/11/26/trump-hillary-clinton-lawsuit-sanction

Court upholds Trump's nearly $1M penalty for frivolous Clinton suit

A conservative federal appeals court unanimously upheld nearly $1 million in sanctions against President Trump and his former attorney Alina Habba for filing what it called a "frivolous" lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and other political enemies.

The big picture: Wednesday's ruling is the latest roadblock in Trump's long-running effort to punish his foes. It's also the president's second loss with the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in recent days, after it refused to revive his defamation lawsuit against CNN.

    A district court judge tossed and eviscerated the case Trump brought against Hillary Clinton and others, writing in 2023 that it "should never have been filed" and was "in bad faith."

Driving the news: The three-judge panel found the district court did not abuse its discretion in slamming Trump and Habba with sanctions and agreed with the lower court's findings that the president's arguments were deficient.

    Chief Judge William Pryor Jr., a George W. Bush appointee, wrote the 36-page opinion joined by Trump-appointee Andrew Brasher and Biden-appointee Embry Kidd.
    "President Trump will continue to pursue this matter to its just and rightful conclusion," a spokesperson for Trump's legal team said in a statement provided to Axios.

Context: Habba represented Trump before he was re-elected and appointed her to serve as the acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey.

    But a federal judge ruled in August that she had been acting as U.S. attorney without legal authority, determining her interim tenure had expired. The DOJ has challenged that decision.

    U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks tossed the lawsuit in September of that year, calling it a "two-hundred-page political manifesto."
    He later sanctioned Trump, Habba and her law firm to pay $937,989 for filing the frivolous lawsuit.
    "Mr. Trump's deliberate use of a frivolous lawsuit for an improper purpose constitutes bad faith," the judge wrote at the time. "And the behavior is not unique, but part of a plan, or at least a playbook."
---