Author Topic: Trump - Alternative Facts dispute re inauguration crowd size  (Read 7683 times)

HockeyFightFan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4947
  • Getgay is Beneath Me
Re: Alternative Facts
« Reply #25 on: January 22, 2017, 12:14:27 PM »
feel free to post examples and we'll see how they compare to the spokesperson for the POTUS being directed by the POTUS to lie about something which in this case (so far) is solely to prop up his profoundly fragile ego


http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/10/hillary-clinton-walks-back-comments-slamming-trump/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/guy-news/?utm_term=.fd3e567aa3b8

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6381
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: Holy. Shit...
« Reply #26 on: January 22, 2017, 12:22:46 PM »
Can you prove CNN was lying?  Are there photos to the contrary?  I'm serious.  Because I watched their stuff last night and they put out a very compelling piece using photos that weren't theirs; it was from different sources (getty, transit authority, secret service, etc)....

The problem is that the Washington Monument was closed so you couldn't get an actual sky high picture, even if you wanted to.

https://twitter.com/Tyrannocankles

I typed into Google, "trump inauguration overflow" that was one of the first things that popped up.

Real talk, on its face it is a silly thing to charge into but that original picture that press used to downplay and to de-legitimize Trumps presidency is pretty lame and an out and out lie. It just confirms what the press is willing to do. With that in mind I don't have a real issue with what Spicer said and did, he just should have chose his words more carefully when claiming things.

Although, Entertainment News says that this was the 2nd highest rated (Neilson) inauguration in 36 years with around 32 million watching on TV alone. Reagan - Obama- Trump. Reagan had 41 million. I think I read that the streaming on other devices was around 20 million or so.

The event was definitely well attended and viewed especially when you consider the riots and violence, security and rioters blocking access points. They could have pointed that out, hammered the media with the same fury and just let the facts speak for themselves while pointing out how dumb the press looks by doing these shenanigans.

Oh well.

HockeyFightFan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4947
  • Getgay is Beneath Me
Re: Alternative Facts
« Reply #27 on: January 22, 2017, 12:51:19 PM »
feel free to post examples and we'll see how they compare to the spokesperson for the POTUS being directed by the POTUS to lie about something which in this case (so far) is solely to prop up his profoundly fragile ego


Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga) - "this will be the first inauguration I will miss"

What about Bush 43?

Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga) - ".............. " (dead silence)

So full of shit.

mazrim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4438
Re: Holy. Shit...
« Reply #28 on: January 22, 2017, 12:57:44 PM »
The problem is that the Washington Monument was closed so you couldn't get an actual sky high picture, even if you wanted to.

https://twitter.com/Tyrannocankles

I typed into Google, "trump inauguration overflow" that was one of the first things that popped up.

Real talk, on its face it is a silly thing to charge into but that original picture that press used to downplay and to de-legitimize Trumps presidency is pretty lame and an out and out lie. It just confirms what the press is willing to do. With that in mind I don't have a real issue with what Spicer said and did, he just should have chose his words more carefully when claiming things.

Although, Entertainment News says that this was the 2nd highest rated (Neilson) inauguration in 36 years with around 32 million watching on TV alone. Reagan - Obama- Trump. Reagan had 41 million. I think I read that the streaming on other devices was around 20 million or so.

The event was definitely well attended and viewed especially when you consider the riots and violence, security and rioters blocking access points. They could have pointed that out, hammered the media with the same fury and just let the facts speak for themselves while pointing out how dumb the press looks by doing these shenanigans.

Oh well.
SaintAnger is a CNN zealot.

mazrim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4438
Re: Alternative Facts
« Reply #29 on: January 22, 2017, 01:05:05 PM »
1. You are still really, really angry.

2. No one is ever going to take you seriously until you start using legitimate sources.

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Alternative Facts
« Reply #30 on: January 22, 2017, 01:23:38 PM »
1. You are still really, really angry.

2. No one is ever going to take you seriously until you start using legitimate sources.
Hahaha he is going to be very angry for a long time, will be a wonder if he doesn't have a heart attack over the next 4 years

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Alternative Facts
« Reply #31 on: January 22, 2017, 01:29:03 PM »
We should really just avoid his bullshit threads.

HockeyFightFan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4947
  • Getgay is Beneath Me
Re: Alternative Facts
« Reply #32 on: January 22, 2017, 01:34:50 PM »
1. You are still really, really angry.

2. No one is ever going to take you seriously until you start using legitimate sources.

OP Probably took sniper fire in Bosnia with Hillary.

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Holy. Shit...
« Reply #33 on: January 22, 2017, 01:37:23 PM »
I really don't care about the attendance of this inauguration, it's petty.  That said  think there is plenty of evidence out that proves CNN will crop photos and strategically show (or not show) things to create false impressions.

They've been caught doing this several times.  They are Democrat political activists.  They are not journalists.  They purposely mislead in order to shape and sway public opinion.

The Trump administration should absolutely continue to call them out on their shit...they just need to take care and make sure they are right when they do it.


Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Trump - Alternative Facts dispute re inauguration crowd size
« Reply #34 on: January 23, 2017, 04:59:36 AM »
Here's the entire interview that started the whole thing on MTP.



At 4:15 , Ms. Conway uses the phrase "alternative facts" to explain the Trump side of things.

Here's my 2 cents:

1. I don't think the exact crowd size or TV viewing ratings are a big  deal.
But, for team Trump, it was . President Trump  brought it up, without being asked , in front of
the CIA Wall of Fallen Hero ( stars). That was inappropriate .

Is his ego really that fragile?

2. How does one have "alternative facts"? There are facts and the rest is bullshit, pulled out someone's ass.

3. It was Pres. Trump and his team that made this a big deal.
It started with WH Press sec Spicer and continued with the rest of his surrogates.

4. To me and many others, the exact crowd size at his Inauguration was a NON-issue.
UNTIL, President Trump ( and his team) made it one.




Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: The Trump inauguration crowd size ( alternative facts) dispute?
« Reply #35 on: January 23, 2017, 05:09:41 AM »
AT LEAST 4 years of this. So buckle up...

What has been talked about more: these comments about crowd size or the protests?
a

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: The Trump inauguration crowd size ( alternative facts) dispute?
« Reply #36 on: January 23, 2017, 05:24:59 AM »
AT LEAST 4 years of this. So buckle up...

What has been talked about more: these comments about crowd size or the protests?

Thank GOD, USMC Gen Mattes was cleared for sec of def with a 98-1 senate vote.
The 1 dissenting voice was a dem liberal female from NY.
I guess she was out marching with a pink pussy hat on Saturday. :-\

Yamcha

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13292
  • Fundie
Re: The Trump inauguration crowd size ( alternative facts) dispute?
« Reply #37 on: January 23, 2017, 05:48:32 AM »
Hillary's Inauguration Size:

a

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: The Trump inauguration crowd size ( alternative facts) dispute?
« Reply #38 on: January 23, 2017, 06:01:19 AM »
Hillary's Inauguration Size:



Her political career rally could have been  at Arlington National Cemetery, It's dead ,  she lost .

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20521
  • loco like a fox
Re: Holy. Shit...
« Reply #39 on: January 23, 2017, 06:42:04 AM »
SaintAnger is a CNN zealot.

SaintAnger is 240's Back's gimmick.

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20521
  • loco like a fox
Re: Holy. Shit...
« Reply #40 on: January 23, 2017, 06:42:52 AM »
They didn't say that the bust was gone?

Yes, they lied about that.

Skeeter

  • Guest

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: The Trump inauguration crowd size ( alternative facts) dispute?
« Reply #42 on: January 23, 2017, 06:59:50 AM »
I don't think it's a BIG deal , but why did Trump care so much?

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: Holy. Shit...
« Reply #43 on: January 23, 2017, 07:14:59 AM »
I think he was just a little nervous and pissed at the same time. Hopefully he'll get used to it. He got the point across.

He was rattled and failed to spin things properly.

IF asked Spicer could have said that and smiled with a dismissive.
" We had a wonderful inauguration for Pres. Trump.
He won and was sworn in. If the press wants to analyze crowd sise via satellite  , have at it."

I think, that Pres. Trump's ego is so fragile he was rattled by the crowd size.
The very idea that black Barry had more kids at his party bothered him.

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6381
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: The Trump inauguration crowd size ( alternative facts) dispute?
« Reply #44 on: January 23, 2017, 07:26:00 AM »
I don't think it's a BIG deal , but why did Trump care so much?


The media is the cat and the Trump team is the guy with laser pointer.

tom joad

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4862
Re: The Trump inauguration crowd size ( alternative facts) dispute?
« Reply #45 on: January 23, 2017, 07:31:14 AM »
Sideshow Bob's press briefings are going to be hilarious.

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: The Trump inauguration crowd size ( alternative facts) dispute?
« Reply #46 on: January 23, 2017, 07:37:24 AM »
Sideshow Bob's press briefings are going to be hilarious.

...this will look like a friendly presser by comparison in a few weeks  ;D


andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Holy. Shit...
« Reply #47 on: January 23, 2017, 09:18:40 AM »
Jesus you really need to do some research man.  This has been debunked from A-Z.  You are embarrassing yourself at this point.

Agreed

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Holy. Shit...
« Reply #48 on: January 23, 2017, 09:19:39 AM »
In your opinion.

It is ironic that CNN being complicit with the Dem Party in fake news, skewed election polls, and outright false reporting of voter trends aren't being blamed by the Dems for their low voter turnout?

Think of how many Lil Waynes and Shaniquas stayed home on Election Day because "dey got dis".

Dude....the poictures don't lie...what is going on with guys like you that just simply refuse to believe facts???????????.....its the same with you guys denying science as well.......

STRANGE..........

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Holy. Shit...
« Reply #49 on: January 23, 2017, 09:21:12 AM »
I really don't care about the attendance of this inauguration, it's petty.  That said  think there is plenty of evidence out that proves CNN will crop photos and strategically show (or not show) things to create false impressions.

They've been caught doing this several times.  They are Democrat political activists.  They are not journalists.  They purposely mislead in order to shape and sway public opinion.

The Trump administration should absolutely continue to call them out on their shit...they just need to take care and make sure they are right when they do it.



and FOX NEWS is the patron saint in terms of truthful journalism???????????????