mentzer trained like everyone else did to get his size. maintaining it he did heavy duty but not one set per bodypart. he pyramided up like everyone else but only counted the last set as the only set.
Partially correct, my good man.
But not quite

Mentzer built his base working with two of his dad's buddies, a pair of powerlifters, when he started training in their garage gym. He was only 12 at the outset, iirc.
Anyhow -- and as related by Mike personally to my ears -- he and his two mentors lifted no more than four times a week, and usually three. They most certainly did NOT do volume training. Mike said they were interested in getting stronger and little else which, to them, required they maybe do a handful of hard sets per muscle group, usually centered around the big three. By the time Mike was 15, he could flat bench 350 and "squat 500 for a few reps," or so he said. (Yes, Fortress, I'm sure you'll dispute that

. Fwiw, I agree his reps probably didn't reach depth ... then again, so fucking what? He was a drug-free teenager training in an early powerlifting style regimen.)
Point being, NO, he didn't "build his base with volume" and/or only "maintain" that with his brand of HIT. He DID go off the deep end late in life, but it's frankly stupid to submit to some lame dichotomy that holds Mentzer's input to either this OR that extreme :/
he found a niche that people would believe and buy into it. what the mags said was bull but kinda true too. saying arnold did 2 hours or more each day for 6 days etc was kinda true but ONLY before contest time. rest of the time was 45 min to and hour 3-4 days a week. same as everyone did from my time. mentzers system sounds good on paper and DOES work a little bit as will any new training system. but you get used to it and with his ( as he wanted people to do it) you burned out way to quickly. good for an occasional workout when time is limited. yes he had great genetics. yes he used alot of drugs yes he used street drugs and smoked. everyone back then had mail order courses and t shirts to make money. mentzer had a great idea and no one else was selling it. case closed.
Again, yes and no.
If Mike developed Heavy Duty and ultra-infrequent training as a pure marketing gimmick to get more clients, wouldn't he be better served by sticking to his recommendations circa the original Heavy Duty concepts? At the very least, why not hang by what he advocated in his '92 edition of HD? Higher frequency multiplied by more clients = more more money, yes?
Mentzer truly *believed* he'd found the best way to train. No question. I'm just sorry that, in the end, his logic was severely flawed -- and his one workout every blue moon, totally wrong.
