Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
June 19, 2018, 06:16:30 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Power squats or Olympic squats?  (Read 1337 times)
oldtimer1
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8861

Getbig!


« on: August 19, 2017, 06:56:18 PM »

Which one do you guys do? For many years I used a power lifting type squat. Low bar placement and semi wide stance. Throwing the back into the lift. I also did Olympic squats with a high placement of the bar and a upright stance sinking it.  I haven't used the squat for a couple of months now instead using the leg press, hack and dumbbell squat. Thought my skinny quads were responding well to the previously mentioned thigh exercises. Tried goblet squats but eventually felt it wasn't a good fit. Now that I'm getting back to Olympic squats I feel so inflexible I can hardly get any depth with a decent weight. Almost feel like I have to learn how to squat again.

With the explosion of cross fit it's now a bragging right of what you can clean and jerk again. I think it's a good thing over what's your bench? The ass to the grass Olympic squat is a major component in Olympic lifting.
Report to moderator   Logged
jpm101
Getbig IV
****
Gender: Male
Posts: 2846


« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2017, 06:26:55 PM »

Over the years, speaking to and watching  a lot of guys and even some very powerful women lifters, I find that front squats and bench squats the most affected for mass and strength. With less stress on the lower back area. With bench squats, most find it an excellent way to learn proper squatting protocol, with more leg/hip and less lower back involvement. Athletes find better performance, from field events to football, with either of these two excellent lower body movements.

Would also include one legged squatting style exercises. As weighted step ups. one legged squats, lunges, etc., to improve squatting abilities themselves.

Body flexibility comes with each lift the more these exercises are worked.

Good Luck.

Report to moderator   Logged

F
Tovarishch_Smert
Getbig II
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 97

ďA lie told often enough becomes truth.Ē


« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2018, 06:07:50 PM »

ATG high bar squats are a complete waste of time and effort for a bodybuilder.
If you arenít an Olympic lifter, then you donít need to squat ATG.
Olympic lifters need to develop power and strength out of the hole because as the weights get heavier they are catching the bar lower and lower.

Parallel or slightly below is perfect for bodybuilding purposes.

CrossFit? Well, thatís a complete joke! I wonít even give it any more words than that... LOL
Report to moderator   Logged
oldtimer1
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8861

Getbig!


« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2018, 03:03:30 AM »

ATG high bar squats are a complete waste of time and effort for a bodybuilder.
If you arenít an Olympic lifter, then you donít need to squat ATG.
Olympic lifters need to develop power and strength out of the hole because as the weights get heavier they are catching the bar lower and lower.

Parallel or slightly below is perfect for bodybuilding purposes.

CrossFit? Well, thatís a complete joke! I wonít even give it any more words than that... LOL


I disagree with you. Simple rules of physics state a greater range of motion is more work than a lessor range of motion. More work equals a greater stress to a muscle trained and that leads to a greater adaptation. I see guys in every bodybuilding gym using a limited range of motion in everything so they can handle heavy weights that they wouldn't be able to handle if they used a full range. They are nurturing their fragile ego. One can see this in the leg press,squat, and various shoulder/pec pressing motions especially. Having written that I just used slightly below parallel squats yesterday due to not using barbell squats in months. They do have value. 

Regarding crossfit I realize bodybuilders have a negative viewpoint of it. From the crossfit practitioners viewpoint they think the same of oiled up drug using thong wearers posing to music.  Crossfit has a lot of value. The beginners or the lack of potential members are the ones used as an example of it's failings. Same can be found in all bodybuilding gyms for failures. Truth be told if you go to any crossfit gym it's top members are amazing. One thing missing from the typical split bodybuilding routines is training for power. They might train for strength but not for power. The Olympic lifts are fantastic for athletic transfer,  sprinting speed and vertical leap development. Having said that I will contradict what I wrote. I train in a typical bodybuilding method with a few exceptions. I use power cleans. Sometimes snatches. I run both distance and sprints. I cross train with limited boxing drills.
Report to moderator   Logged
IroNat
Getbig II
**
Gender: Male
Posts: 278



« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2018, 03:56:29 AM »

Olympic (high bar) squats are generally believed better for developing the quads/bodybuilding purposes.

I have always done them, usually from a very narrow stance.
Report to moderator   Logged
chaos
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 45472


Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan


« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2018, 06:20:10 PM »

ATG for life!
Report to moderator   Logged

Liar!!!!Filt!!!!
Yev33
Getbig III
***
Posts: 915


« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2018, 05:45:40 PM »

I use ATG olympic squats and front squats exclusively. I also throw in some single leg work every training cycle. I dont do let presses, machine squats, etc.. The only machines I use as far as lower body training would be the hamstring curl every once in a while.

Here is what I have found from doing this:

- My leg development is better than before.

- My mobility and flexibilty sucked and I had to work on it pretty hard. IMO anyone who seriously trains with weights should be able to perform a barefoot ATG overhead squat. This will ensure you have the proper lower and upper body mobility to perform free weight lifts. When I first realized how poor my mobilty was I could not get into a full squat position barefoot let alone an overhead squat.

- High bar Olympic style squats are a tool for Olympic weightlifters to develop leg strength. They are a means to an end not the end itself. So they look at it from a what's more productive for development of leg strength not what allows to lift most weight in the squat it self. Powerlifting squats are a competion lift and they ARE after maximum weight, it's not a developmental lift necessarily. So they choose a style that will allow them to use the most weight.

- Failing with a high bar squat is much safer than a low bar squat. A low bar squat ends up failing over your head, a proper high bar squat can easily be dumped behind you.

- A high bar placement is more natural. Just like a properly racked front squat can be performed without your hands touching the bar, a properly racked high bar squat can be done like that as well (not with maximal weights of course). The same cannot be done with a low bar squat, the hands play a crucial role in locking the weight in place which also causes heavy stress on the shoulders BTW.

As far as a Olympic lifts are concerned. I think they are great. Right now I use clean pulls and snatch pulls and feel that this has helped my traps and upper back. IMO the most explosive part of the lift is getting the bar from the floor to "catch" height. It is also the part of the lift that requires less technical mastery which few people will posess without proper coaching. I would like to eventually work into full Olympic lifts but for now this is serving me pretty well.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!