Question for you B_MyT---
Out of the 90 pages you've read--you see ABSOLUTELY nothing that looks-- just LOOKS like obstruction or collusion? Not one single entry in that entire report?
(serious question)
First of all, I just have to say that I find it hysterical that we're such cynical assholes on this site daily that we have to include (serious question) every time we want to let it be know we are in fact being serious and curious to know how a person truly feels......that's not a slam in any way, as I do it all the time as well.
To answer your question:
I haven't read since the 2nd day it came out, but I do plan to read the whole thing. I stated in my other post how it read, and that made me lose a bit of interest/vigor for reading it especially once I realized during the first day that the media was not going to let up. So I went to my notes I was taking....
In the first 90 pages.....NO! I don't see anything that looks like collusion or obstruction by Trump (keep in mind obstruction is not covered til part 2). I can see how someone would say otherwise that is totally invested in the collusion scheme though, as the beginning is written under the premise that collusion will be found and it's the whole reason for the investigation. I know this was supposedly an independent counsel investigation, but I don't see how anyone can objectively and honestly say that an investigation conducted by "Obama's FBI" that took over 2 years to reach a conclusion was actually unbiased. Cohen was interviewed as late as Nov 2018 according to the part I've read so far. Why? He was a proven liar by then. They wanted an answer to be what they wanted to hear, and the only reason we finally got a report was because Barr got put into place, and said "enough is enough....whip it out and show us what you got" (Tried to make that reader friendly for you to keep your interest
)
P. 23 states that the IRA started in 2014 and posted critique of Killary b4 she even announced.
p. 27 @missournewsus posted pro-Sanders material (so I guess he colluded with the russians too then?)
p. 61 "Stone refused the offer, stating that Trump WOULD NOT pay for opposition research"
p. 62 "Ledeen began search for Clinton emails at the latest possible starting point in dec. 2015, which was long b4 Flynn's supposed request or Trump's statements" - not sure if I was paraphrasing that or those were word for word...not going back to reread right now.....just wanted to clarify. "Trump's statements" refers to "russia if you're listening" though. I remember that for certain.
p. 72 This is where I feel there's some shenanigans, but it's not Trump doing it. Mr. big shot fucktard new yorker cohen, and some other guy I didn't write down said something about "2 boys from brooklyn" being responsible for getting a president of the U.S. elected. If I'm being honest, if Cohen would have had more stroke or as much as he thought he did there likely would have been some collusion. He's a scummy little fuck that strives on power, and being a mover and shaker. He kept trying to make things happen, and was continually put in his place.
p. 73 more illustration of cohen being a dipshit. Couldn't even send a fucking email to the right address when trying to email Klokov about Trump Tower project, and getting russian officials involved. He did not even know klokov.....just reached out trying to be the shit. Sent "follow-on emails" referencing a "near-term trip"....what douche uses that language? He was not authorized, and Trump's schedule didn't allow for such a visit, nor was Trump interested as on p. 78 it states that Trump turned down the St. Petersburg business conference invite. BTW, even in follow up interviews into 2018 Cohen still thought Klokov was a former olympic lifter he had found researching background of the russian official's name to correspond in emails......wrong person!!!
p. 79 I'd have to go back to read who it was, but I wrote down "early private channel" between putin and george w. bush. This was in reference to someone from russia trying to show that they would be worth having on board team Trump. Hmmmmm.......so this type of stuff is not new??? Anyway, it never happened with Trump.
That's as far as I got. When I say I read 90 pages, I'm talking about in PDF view. I think p. 91 in pdf view is p. 79 or so of the actual report page numbers where I left off.
So you tell me where there's any collusion in that?
Serious question.....have you read, or are you reading the report for yourself or are you just going along with what the media is telling you?
