pellius - just to be clear, I don't doubt that bad things happened to Jewish people during WWII. I think that's been established, just by looking at names of Jewish people who lost family members during the war.
What I don't believe is that there was an intentional policy on behalf of Hitler to exterminate all Jews - at least initially. What I think happened, based on the evidence, is that Hitler wanted to remove Jews from Germany due to their continual economic and cultural exploitation of the nation [most notably, crippling reparations imposed on Germany via the Treaty of Versailles]. In addition, the Jewish involvement in communism wasn't exactly a secret.
Once the war took a turn, and Germany started losing, that's when things may have moved closer to a policy of deliberate extermination, but that was more a function of losing the war, and Germany being continually attacked.
I think the Jewish community had the power [media and banking influence] to stop attacking Germany, and the further murder of Jews would have stopped, but I think that would have led to Jews being expelled from Germany, and the more powerful Jews within international finance didn't want to lose Germany, and thus, didn't want to negotiate. In this sense, I think they were willing to take the risk of other Jews dying, as they felt it would be a greater cost for Jews to be expelled from Germany, and potentially all of Europe.
I don't want to engage in conspiracy theories, but I see no evidence that Hitler wanted to exterminate all Jews - at least not initially. How else can things like the Madagascar Plan be explained? I don't see why a person bent on genocide would contemplate moving all Jews to an African island. That is more consistent with a person whose goal is emigration - not extermination.
Just my thoughts.