Uhhh...reality check: weren't you totally detrained after a very long layoff before you started back with the weird hide and seek Anadrol doses thing?
There are FAR too many variables in play for you to spout percentage one, dude, especially given that you seem improved from a couple of angles at best. To be blunt, your last pics were surprising, and not in a good way. Your face looked like you were storing a few kilos of acorns for winter, you had a fold of fat on your chest and you just looked puffy and, if not plain fat, definitely waterlogged.
And this is why I can't take what you are saying seriously - I JUST FUCKING CAN'T.
The results I got from 15mg of Anadrol are EXACTLY THE RESULTS ANYONE WOULD GET.
As for facial bloat - have you bothered looking at the faces of any competitive pro bodybuilders or Strongmen?
They ALWAYS hold water in their face. And this is partially why I oh rarely used gear. It is NOT worth it to me to run gear if the side effects include having a puffy face, having pimples on my back, or LOSING MY HAIR.
I can say this most sincerely: I would rather keep my hairline than to have a perfect body, even if I could snap my fingers and have it, but at the cost of my hair.
Screw that!
Judging by how I look at 170-210, as far as I can tell, I can be as heavy as 210 without suffering too much face bloat. While my face bloat is NOTHING like your extremely exaggerated depiction of it, it is still more than I would personally want.
Which tells me that 190 may be the optimal body weight.
Also, do you think people will take seriously things you tell them when you massively exaggerate the facts? I can accept that I am holding water due to the minimal Anadrol I ran - but to suggest that I have some out of control water issue. I mean, come on.
But that's the thing - whether some people need to take the opportunity to be an asshole to me rather than just point to the areas I need to improve upon, and advise on them doesn't matter to me. I listen to all advice here IF I think it will help me. Even if someone is only doing it to be an asshole. Likewise, if I think the advice is bad, I'll ignore it.
I DO NOT think my form on the dumbbell press needs to be radically changed, so...I'm not going to radically change it. I will take my depth down a few inches, but certainly not a "foot" - which I literally can't go down that far anyway.
Whatever.
We've all given you good advice. You ignore it outright, argue when your ego is hurt (has anyone in Getbig history flapped his yap more over justifying sloppy fucking DB shoulder press reps?!),
My dumbbell shoulder press reps were NOT that bad, and nothing you say is going to make me say that they were very bad. I could go down a few more inches - maybe - but my reps were ok.
CASE IN POINT - look at these other videos of people pressing similarly heavy weights. Now tell me, Titus - does even ONE of these lifters utilize as much range of motion as me? Even ONE?
^ ALL experienced lifters, with KinoBody having over a MILLION subscribers, and EVERY SINGLE ONE has a more limited range of motion than me.
In fact, I've been searching YouTube all day, and can't find ANY examples of people using a greater range of motion on dumbbells of 100-lb or heavier.
And that's what really grinds my gears here - I have a press which is no doubt on of the strongest on Getbig, and I post a video with form SLIGHTLY off, and all anyone does is shit one when not ONE of those criticizing me can lift the same weight?
I'm sorry, but fuck that. I am receptive to constructive criticism, but when you have B. Hank telling me I need to go down a foot lower on my presses [something PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for me to do], and Walter Sobchak calling me a "weakling" - AGAIN, FOR A LIFT EASILY IN THE TOP 10 ON THIS BOARD RIGHT NOW - I take issue with that!
Polite, constructive criticism, I can handle, no problem. Insults, and exaggerations on my form which was not great, but was certain not bad, is another matter entirely.
then start all over with every excuse imaginable for why you aren't eating properly, why you continue to do this and that because "hey, something must be right in my training know-how, because I just lifted this!"
Begging the Question defined.
I think you do train hard. That's good. But as we've all told you, lots of the sets you've filmed are ugly and not optimal for any purpose, be they for strength or hypertrophy (and there needn't be the implicit dichotomy there between that you constantly harp on, but that's another story).
I wish you well, but until you manage to get your head into this, we're all wasting our time offering you advice. You never listen. You don't even listen to YOURSELF, for God's sake. If you did, your posts easily would be half again smaller. All you gotta do to start is stop repeating the same goddamned point two or three times in one message.
That's all. Be well, Matt.
No, you're not wasting time offering me advice, Titus. Not you, nor anyone else.
But if people are going to be assholes, suggesting I have a full FOOT left to lower the dumbbells, or that I am a weakling, etc, of course I'm not going to listen.
On one hand, people are saying I'm cheating and getting more reps by not going deep enough, but then I post a video of Eddie Hall doing reps, not ONE OF WHICH was locked out...and not one person mentions that HE is saving energy by never locking out, and that his technique is "perfect no lock form".
Huh?

So let me get this straight:
Next week, if I did the same lift again with the same weight, went LOWER for each rep, but didn't lock out, and ended up getting roughly the same number of reps...would people be ok with that?
If I had to guess...I'd say people would NOT be ok with that, and people would be trashing me for not locking out!!!
Also, you said that my form wasn't going to help me get stronger or bigger. I'd argue that my form does indeed make me get stronger - after all, I did get to a 345 bench press [320 in contest form] by doing what I did. How much stronger would I possibly have gotten at my weight, had I done all these refined techniques?
My training is fine. Not perfect - but fine. But WHY THE FUCK would I focus on changing something which is already fine, and which is NOT the deficit?
My lack of calories is, and always has been, my deficit.
But anyway, Titus: I do take advice, INCLUDING training advice, if it's good advice. So despite B. Hank being an asshole and suggesting I have a foot left to go on those shoulder presses [bullshit], I will be taking his advice and lowering it by 2-3 inches next time.
I also now see that I have weak wrists. I will have to figure out how to strengthen them.
I don't mind being told my form is a bit off - but for B. Hank to say I need to go a full FOOT lower, and that I wouldn't even be able to get one rep with the 100-lb dumbbells is BULLSHIT. I can literally do rest/pause sets with the 100's, for probably two reps at two seconds pause between reps.
It's one thing to say "Lower the weight to get full reps - although you will get a few fewer reps if you do that." It's another thing entirely for him to suggest I can't handle pressing 100-lb dumbbells, which I OBVIOUSLY FUCKING CAN DO as clearly shown in the video!
But ONLY ON GETBIG, can a person be in the top 0.05% of pressing strength in the world, and he trashed for it.

What's more is that I have been nothing but respectful and complimentive to B. Hank, and he responds like an asshole like that, attacking me on my strength level which I have BEYOND proven myself on.