Hi Marvin ! 🙋♀️
I am back home now. Yes, I ran 4.33 in running shoes, after track practice. I think I was 18 years old. I have always kept running and sprinting in my training program.
I have heard stories and seen the rare video clips of guys who run 4.2 at the NFL combine, but I’ve never seen one in person.
I’m a little older now, and maybe 3-4 lbs lighter, but no one is getting up off their couch and outrunning me. Hankins is talking out his (bleeding) ass.
That's an incredible time.
I sort of have a sprint story myself.
I was always fast - one of the fastest in my grade level, and the fastest in most of my Army courses. I never understand why I was a bad long distance runner. But sprinting is not the same as long distance running. My best time was 8KM [5 miles] in 32.5 minutes. That was #5 in my high school at the time.
In 1995 and 1996, local attorney Derek Noyes swept all four sprints [100m, 200m, 400m, 800m], and beat everyone.
Except for me.

I beat him in the 400m in 1996. The whole auditorium ooh'd and ahh'd.

I wish I knew my time...probably around 65s, but I don't know.
But more relevant to the 40-yard dash would be my 100 metre sprint. I was sub 12.5 seconds, and MAY have been around the 12 second mark.
Comparing that to your time:
A 40-yard dash in 4.33 is 36.576 metres in 4.33 seconds.
That's 8.45 m/s.
Retaining all decimals that's equal to running 100 metres in 11.84 seconds.
That's wild. Impressive by any stretch, and even more so for a woman.
This is when B. Hank, if he had my 100m time, would say "Yeah, but 40 yards isn't the same as 100m."

No, that's really, really good, Jane.
As a matter of fact, I'm not sure what the fastest portion of the 100m is. Presumably, we accelerate as time goes on? So maybe your 100m would be even faster than 11.84?
Just one thing [not to be like B. Hank, having to diminish EVERYTHING everyone does

]:
I'm not remotely surprised you would beat football players at the 40-yard dash. They are athletic freaks...no doubt about that. And they are designed and trained for maximal performance and [frankly] pure violence in 60-second bursts.
But I'm not shocked you beat them.
To hit 11.84 equivalent 100 metre time is wild though. Heck, when I got my ~65s 400m in 1996, Donavan Bailey was the fastest [tested] human being ever with a 9.84s/100m!
So that's crazy.
You had to be at least state level, running that fast?
PS - presumably my winning 400m time would be on record somewhere. This would have been 1996, at Ecole Gron Morgan Public School [French Immersion school]. You mentioned you always keep running in your training program. I think once I'm done getting my 3-lifts up go 350/450/550, I'm going to attempt to retain those numerous while dropping to ~185, and leaning out a little.

Then I can challenge B. Hank to shut 100m sprint, and beat him there too.