Donald Von Shitzhizpantz the legend continues.

[Grape Ape]

   CAN YOU REALLY TRUST SNOPES, I MEAN THEY ARE BASED IN CALIFORNIA. Snopes.com, founded in 1995 by David and Barbara Mikkelson, is a website focused on fact-checking and debunking urban legends and online rumors. Located in California's San Fernando Valley, the site offers evidence-based analysis of claims. Although Snopes has received criticism regarding its accuracy and potential bias, it remains a resource for online fact-checking, and in 2024, it launched "FactBot," an AI tool.

I am always skeptical of sources.

However, if I have to choose between Snopes and your random memes, I will defer to the former, considering so much of what you post is factually incorrect.  Not a differing opinion, mind you, but factually incorrect.

You have earned that reputation by not checking or researching what you choose to present here.

[funk51]

Bullshit, let's discuss this. You're walking talking leftist talking point that you parrot. We don't and have never had a "gun violence" problem. We have a liberal problem.

  Will you shut the fock up about me being the enemy. where do you come up with this shit. so some far right winger gets shot so do a lot of other innocent people see school shootings. ENOUGH.... gun violence is everyone's problem. For christ sakes nobody is trying to keep guns out of responsible gun owners hands just take them out of the hands of the crazies to the best of our ability. Maybe Trump should open the nut houses again, some people should just be warehoused, sorry if this offends you, but it's true.

[funk51]

I am always skeptical of sources.

However, if I have to choose between Snopes and your random memes, I will defer to the former, considering so much of what you post is factually incorrect.  Not a differing opinion, mind you, but factually incorrect.

You have earned that reputation by not checking or researching what you choose to present here.

  But some of it is. To be honest who really knows who to believe anymore.

[Coach is Back!]

  But some of it is. To be honest who really knows who to believe anymore.

Then if you don't know then why post it?

[funk51]

Then if you don't know then why post it?

   

                          I'm just trying to catch up to you in my post count ........................ ..............{meant to be a joke].  Actually I pretty much dislike all politicians, but I still love my country and want what's best for it.

[Primemuscle]

You don't live in a bubble, but you follow politics and didn't know who Charlie Kirk was until he was murdered.  Got it.

I am not sure you got it. I cannot prove this, but my guess is there a lot of folks who did not know about him before he was murdered. Yes I follow politics, but it is a very small part of my life.

[Dos Equis]

I am not sure you got it. I cannot prove this, but my guess is there a lot of folks who did not know about him before he was murdered. Yes I follow politics, but it is a very small part of my life.

No one who follows politics would have no idea who Charlie Kirk was, unless you get your news from leftist media outlets who create safe spaces for their audience by shielding them from opposing viewpoints. 

Charlie Kirk wasn't just some "right-wing" pundit.  He was a transformational figure in American politics.  His impact on the 2024 election was enormous.  And he was brilliant.  The fact you had never heard of him really does speak volumes about how insulated you are.  And just to be clear, I don't care one bit if you live in a bubble.  Everyone has the right to consume whatever media they want.  But living in a bubble does make you misinformed and uninformed.  I just call things as I see them.

[Grape Ape]

  But some of it is. To be honest who really knows who to believe anymore.

Some of it is for sure.

But you could answer the second sentence if you took the time to follow the folks I've sent you, watch the movie, etc....

You would then have and informed opinion on things backed up by real facts, and know where to go when you want the truth.

It takes some work, yes.  But it's better than mindlessly passing on information.   That's a big part of what's led to the recent political violence - sheep doing what they're told and what to believe.  There are literally 1000s of videos of folks protesting Kirk at college campuses, calling him fascist, nazi, hateful, and a white supremecist, but then being completely unable to provide examples of any of that.  Well, guess, what, someone believed it enough to kill him.  It should be a wake up call for folks doing what you're doing to change their behavior.

[Primemuscle]

No one who follows politics would have no idea who Charlie Kirk was, unless you get your news from leftist media outlets who create safe spaces for their audience by shielding them from opposing viewpoints. 

Charlie Kirk wasn't just some "right-wing" pundit.  He was a transformational figure in American politics.  His impact on the 2024 election was enormous.  And he was brilliant.  The fact you had never heard of him really does speak volumes about how insulated you are.  And just to be clear, I don't care one bit if you live in a bubble.  Everyone has the right to consume whatever media they want.  But living in a bubble does make you misinformed and uninformed.  I just call things as I see them.

For anyone including you to know for certain that not one person who follows politics would have no idea who Charlie Kirk was prior to his assassination is beyond amazing and also impossible. The social media political forum on Getbig is clearly not a leftist one and yet I have never seen anything about him posted here prior to his assassination.

Honestly expressing your opinion and judgement is okay, but opinions may not necessarily be factual or correct.

If I live in a bubble, it is a very crowded one, because no one I associate with has ever mentioned anything about Charlie Kirk. And yet, some of my associates are lobbyists and political activists, although they are primarily involved in local and state politics. Only a few political activists and lobbyists employed at AFT headquarters in D.C. focus mainly on national politics.

[Primemuscle]

No one who follows politics would have no idea who Charlie Kirk was, unless you get your news from leftist media outlets who create safe spaces for their audience by shielding them from opposing viewpoints. 

Charlie Kirk wasn't just some "right-wing" pundit.  He was a transformational figure in American politics.  His impact on the 2024 election was enormous.  And he was brilliant.  The fact you had never heard of him really does speak volumes about how insulated you are.  And just to be clear, I don't care one bit if you live in a bubble.  Everyone has the right to consume whatever media they want.  But living in a bubble does make you misinformed and uninformed.  I just call things as I see them.

For anyone including you to know for certain that not one person who follows politics would have no idea who Charlie Kirk was prior to his assassination is beyond amazing and also impossible. The social media political forum on Getbig is clearly not a leftist one and yet I have never seen anything about him posted here prior to his assassination.

Honestly expressing your opinion and judgement is okay, but opinions may not necessarily be factual or correct.

If I live in a bubble, it is a very crowded one, because no one I associate with has ever mentioned anything about Charlie Kirk. And yet, some of my associates are lobbyists and political activists, although they are primarily involved in local and state politics. Only a few political activists and lobbyists employed at AFT headquarters in D.C. focus mainly on national politics.

[Dos Equis]

For anyone including you to know for certain that not one person who follows politics would have no idea who Charlie Kirk was prior to his assassination is beyond amazing and also impossible. The social media political forum on Getbig is clearly not a leftist one and yet I have never seen anything about him posted here prior to his assassination.

Honestly expressing your opinion and judgement is okay, but opinions may not necessarily be factual or correct.

If I live in a bubble, it is a very crowded one, because no one I associate with has ever mentioned anything about Charlie Kirk. And yet, some of my associates are lobbyists and political activists, although they are primarily involved in local and state politics. Only a few political activists and lobbyists employed at AFT headquarters in D.C. focus mainly on national politics.

There are references to Charlie Kirk on this board going back to 2018.  The most recent before his murder is this:

Doocy's income and income earning potential would skyrocket if he takes a temporary pay cut to be press secretary.

Megyn Kelly is awesome, but she's too independent to become an employee again.

Charlie Kirk would be good, but I'd rather see him in the field.  He is as responsible as anyone for the election results. 

It's probably going to be someone we're not even thinking about.

The fact no one you associate with ever mentioned Charlie Kirk is not surprising.  You probably associate with people with similar views, who get their news the same way you do.  That doesn't make you weird or a bad person.  There are plenty of people like you.  My wife had never heard of Charlie Kirk before he was murdered, but she doesn't follow politics, other than trying not to fall asleep whenever I start ranting about something. 

BTW, she started watching a bunch of Charlie Kirk clips after his murder said she thought he was a really nice person who was very funny and smart.  She is right. 

[chaos]

This is exactly it.

But, it doesn't excuse folks now from passing along false information.

I cannot fathom why so many are willfully manipulated.

How much evidence do they need?

It's easier to allow yourself to be manipulated than it is to admit you have been manipulated.