Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

NarsisisticDeity and Hulkster are both 16 year old homosexual muscle worshipers.



Who the hell argues over the appearance of half naked musclemen except homosexuals? I mean c'mon!

You be quiet !! I'll benchpress you for reps 

[Johnny Apollo]

You be quiet !! I'll benchpress you for reps 

Wow! Big accomplishment!

You can bench my bodyweight for reps! You must feel proud of yourself!



The only way benching me for reps would be an accomplishment would be if i'm over 300lbs(which i'm not). Benching more than 300lbs for reps is a small accomplishment even in itself.



Jackass!

[nicorulez]

ND...your point is ..... wrong.  Ronnie in 1999 was over 255.  He was more striated than Dorian ever was.  The only reason Dorian won in 1996/1997 was legacy.  I agree, in 1993, it would have been a good show.  However, the taper that Dorian brought to the table in 1992 when he was 240-250 was lost at 260+.  In 1993, his best year, he was getting the beginnings of a gut.  So if you want to compare them at their heaviest, put the 2003 Coleman or even 2005 version and they would win.  Coleman just outsizes Dorian and is more vascular.  Graininess be damned when they start flexing.  He took it to a new level in 2003.  We may all prefer the pre-gut 1998 level, but 2003 is the year that sub-six footer walked out on stage with a legit 285+ package.  His musculature would have blown Yates in any year out of the water.  BTW, comparing Fux to Coleman is laughable.  Swallowhismommy has serious issues.

[Hulkster]

  Actually, besides Arnie's side chest shot from 1974, this is he most imprssive bodybuilding picture ever. It still blows me away, in the same way it did back in 93, when I saw i for the first time.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

lol - I suppose you like supersoft quads, and delts that have such bad shape that you can't tell where they begin and end.

THIS is what a mm should look like:


 

[Hulkster]

BTW, comparing Fux to Coleman is laughable.  Swallowhismommy has serious issues.

yeah, saying that because Yates beat some 280 pound guys like Fux means that he would beat a 280 pound Coleman is hilarious.

Man, these dorian guys are so desperate they will say anything

[Hulkster]

now you can go on-and-on about how Ronnie has superior , arms , delts , chest , back , taper , detail , aesthetics , vascularity , striations , and all of these things would push Ronnie over the edge for a easy victory , but its a moot-fucking point because he had all of those supposed advantages when he lost to Yates on seven occasions and it did zero for him

you are a fool:



if you are trying to argue that Ronnie in the first shot (when he was losing all the time to Yates) is the same as Ronnie in the second shot (at his peak) than you are sorely mistaken.

Ronnie that lost to dorian was nothing compared to Ronnie at his peak.
Just compare pics - even Ronnie in 1997 was nothing compared to Ronnie at the 99 Grand prix or the Arnold Classic.

saying otherwise is just being naive.

[Johnny Apollo]

***Gay muscle worshiper Alert***

[Hulkster]

One thing that is constantly being stated that is totally wrong is that Ronnie at the 99 Olympia was soft compared to 98. I just watched the 99 video and could not believe how striated Ronnie was. when he hits the side chest during the top 6 comparison, the camera focases on just him and he has striations rippling everywhere (arms, tris, pecs, quads etc). Unreal. His biceps at the 99 Olympia have to be seen to be believed.


he looked unreal at this show, and his quads were WAY more cut than in 1998. and he had better fullness (probably due to the added size).

Also, his taper was crazy.

Too bad I have no way of capturing any of the shots from the video - it would put an END to this debate once and for all.

[Hulkster]

***Gay muscle worshiper Alert***

go back to the religion board.

[Bast175]

Hulkster and Narc. should be banned for this.

[Hulkster]

Hulkster and Narc. should be banned for this.

getbig would be a shallow, hollow and desolate place without us!

[Johnny Apollo]

go back to the religion board.

I've owned all I can own overthere. They don't even put up a fight anymore.

[dearth]

  Neither needs supporters to state their opinion.

what a great deduction lucius!!
unforturnately it has little to do with what I stated.


let me make it simple for you

In hucksters posts, he states that he has somehow "won" the debate
and "proven" ND wrong simply because he has more supporters.

this is poor logic for an intelligent argument.

[Hulkster]

what a great deduction lucius!!
unforturnately it has little to do with what I stated.


let me make it simple for you

In hucksters posts, he states that he has somehow "won" the debate
and "proven" ND wrong simply because he has more supporters.

this is poor logic for an intelligent argument.

no it isn't.

If I was arguing that 2+2 = 4, and ND was saying that 2+2=5, and of course everyone agreed with me, wouldn't it look bad for ND's argument if no one thought he was right? 

Same is happening here. If I could post a clip of the 99 Olympia, even ND would see the light. Striations everywhere.  "Graininess" would not save dorian without striations.

[NarcissisticDeity]

One thing that is constantly being stated that is totally wrong is that Ronnie at the 99 Olympia was soft compared to 98. I just watched the 99 video and could not believe how striated Ronnie was. when he hits the side chest during the top 6 comparison, the camera focases on just him and he has striations rippling everywhere (arms, tris, pecs, quads etc). Unreal. His biceps at the 99 Olympia have to be seen to be believed.


he looked unreal at this show, and his quads were WAY more cut than in 1998. and he had better fullness (probably due to the added size).

Also, his taper was crazy.

Too bad I have no way of capturing any of the shots from the video - it would put an END to this debate once and for all.

1999 Mr Olympia lol look at poor Ronnie in the back and Hulkster you can't argue with Peter McGough he is the one who said Ronnie wasn't as good as he was in 1999 vs 1998

[pumpster]

.

[NarcissisticDeity]

no it isn't.

If I was arguing that 2+2 = 4, and ND was saying that 2+2=5, and of course everyone agreed with me, wouldn't it look bad for ND's argument if no one thought he was right? 

Same is happening here. If I could post a clip of the 99 Olympia, even ND would see the light. Striations everywhere.  "Graininess" would not save dorian without striations.

You want striations ? 1993 Mr Olympia , his lower lats are feathered with them and his christmastree has never been so striated , and guess what he has striated glutes as well , his itercostles & obliques were shredded and he had striations in his chest , and striations are genetic , so you say " Dorian doesn't have as many as Ronnie " I counter with " Ronnie doesn't have as many as Andres Munzer " and why some don't have any at all no matter how lean they get !!

[Hulkster]

1999 Mr Olympia lol look at poor Ronnie in the back and Hulkster you can't argue with Peter McGough he is the one who said Ronnie wasn't as good as he was in 1999 vs 1998

if you watched the video you would not be saying that.  Ronnie had more cuts on his left quad than Dorian did on his entire body.

He dominated that night, even over chris.  LOL - seeing chris' back compared to Ronnie's was hilarious in the top 6 comparisons. Same with the front double bi, side chest, lat spreads etc.

ronnie's side chest was amazing at that show. Striations galore on film.

[Hulkster]

his lower back was supercut.  great.

what about his arms, chest (not that striated), quads, hamstrings, glutes, delts, biceps - Ronnie's biceps had muscle fibers everywhere at his best.

Sorry, but the 1999 Ronnie would destroy Dorian - watch the tape.

I have seen the 93 O. and Dorian was nowhere near what Ronnie displayed at the night show in 99.

the screenshot I posted above does not do any justice.

[NarcissisticDeity]

his lower back was supercut.  great.

what about his arms, chest (not that striated), quads, hamstrings, glutes, delts, biceps - Ronnie's biceps had muscle fibers everywhere at his best.

Sorry, but the 1999 Ronnie would destroy Dorian - watch the tape.

I have seen the 93 O. and Dorian was nowhere near what Ronnie displayed at the night show in 99.

the screenshot I posted above does not do any justice.

Ronnie 1999 was off especially compared to Ronnie 98  the extra 8 pounds Ronnie had in 1999 all went to his gut and from the back he wasn't as crisp

[pumpster]

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=69002.50

[dearth]

no it isn't.

If I was arguing that 2+2 = 4, and ND was saying that 2+2=5, and of course everyone agreed with me, wouldn't it look bad for ND's argument if no one thought he was right? 

Same is happening here. If I could post a clip of the 99 Olympia, even ND would see the light. Striations everywhere.  "Graininess" would not save dorian without striations.

yes it is (poor logic)

if you go to dallas and have a verbat spat with a redskins fan about which team is better (cowboys vs redskins),
it is poor logic to think that you have somehow "won" just because you have 100s of cowboys supporters.

same thing here. this board happens to have more ronnie supporters.

by claiming to have "defeated" ND based on the fact that more on this board agree with you, says very little
of your powers of reasoning.

[Hulkster]

yes it is (poor logic)

if you go to dallas and have a verbat spat with a redskins fan about which team is better (cowboys vs redskins),
it is poor logic to think that you have somehow "won" just because you have 100s of cowboys supporters.

same thing here. this board happens to have more ronnie supporters.

by claiming to have "defeated" ND based on the fact that more on this board agree with you, says very little
of your powers of reasoning.

no, totally wrong.

this board does not 'happen" to have more ronnie supporters.

The entire world has more Ronnie supporters because most everyone can see that he is in a different class than Dorian was.

don't try and make excuses for the support of your unpopular view just because of chance.

It is not because of chance.
It is because of reality.



two different classes..

[NarcissisticDeity]

no, totally wrong.

this board does not 'happen" to have more ronnie supporters.

The entire world has more Ronnie supporters because most everyone can see that he is in a different class than Dorian was.

don't try and make excuses for the support of your unpopular view just because of chance.

It is not because of chance.
It is because of reality.


two different classes..

Two different classes is right lol Dorian lost just twice as a Pro and Ronnie lost get this 35 times 35 fucking times lol in 61 contests thats win percentage rate of just 42% , Dorian won 15 of 17 contests that leaves Dorian with a win percentage rate of 88% your-goddamn-right they are in two different classes

[pumpster]

Dorian's right there with Haney as very *best* of 2nd tier Olympians, seriously. Blows away Dickerson & Columbu!

As seen here in various bear-like shots..