Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3526807 times)

pobrecito · « **Reply #6325 on:** July 16, 2006, 09:49:38 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 16, 2006, 09:22:39 AM

In shape like that Flex could never win because of just a few things against him:

-Much less structural shoulder width, so he had a lot less taper standing beside Coleman.

-Lat width.

-Thigh size.

Coleman was similar but just bigger all-round. Wheeler had better calves for sure, but that's not enough to overcome the above, especially the structural shoulder width difference and overall just bigger structure.

Later on it looks like he tried to address that by using synthol in his delts.

Coleman had a gut and Flex's waist was quite a bit smaller. If you check the lineup pictures from the 99O you will see just how much smaller Flex's waist is....Ronnie's waist appears small becuase of his huge lats..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #6326 on:** July 16, 2006, 10:53:24 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 16, 2006, 08:49:52 AM

A very logical and well thought post .

pumpster · « **Reply #6327 on:** July 16, 2006, 11:26:32 AM »

Quote

Coleman had a gut and Flex's waist was quite a bit smaller. If you check the lineup pictures from the 99O you will see just how much smaller Flex's waist is....Ronnie's waist appears small becuase of his huge lats..

Wheeler's waist was much smaller but Coleman didn't have a gut issue then-his waist was still proportionally smaller than Wheeler's in relation to shoulder width, resulting in a marketdly better V.

pobrecito · « **Reply #6328 on:** July 16, 2006, 11:40:48 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 16, 2006, 11:26:32 AM

Wheeler's waist was much smaller but Coleman didn't have a gut issue then-his waist was still proportionally smaller than Wheeler's in relation to shoulder width, resulting in a marketdly better V.

Coleman did have a gut in 01....that cannot be denied. He had a gut in 99, 2000, and 2001 mr. olympia. Do you think it magically went away?

pumpster · « **Reply #6329 on:** July 16, 2006, 11:48:05 AM »

I hope you're not suggesting that it was the same size 6-7 years ago. His waist was both under control and a significant contribution to a much better taper than Wheeler.

pobrecito · « **Reply #6330 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:00:04 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 16, 2006, 11:48:05 AM

I hope you're not suggesting that it was the same size 6-7 years ago. His waist was both under control and a significant contribution to a much better taper than Wheeler.

Coleman's gut is nowhere near what it was in 2003, but regardless, he had a gut, and in my opinion having a gut is not what my ideal bodybuilder represents. Flex had no gut, a tiny waist, a great taper, striated quads, perfectly shaped abs, amazing back detail, christmas tree, and on and on. Coleman looked GREAT at the 01 ASC, but the reality of having a gut just blows it for me.

pobrecito · « **Reply #6331 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:03:00 PM »

This picture illustrates just how much smaller Flex's waist is. Other than that, he can't even compete with coleman...

pobrecito · « **Reply #6332 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:04:28 PM »

I think it's questionable that Coleman has a better taper than Flex...

pumpster · « **Reply #6333 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:11:42 PM »

Quote

This picture illustrates just how much smaller Flex's waist is. Other than that, he can't even compete with coleman...

Those pics show once again that that Coleman was bigger everywhere, so a bigger waist is moot. Wheeler's lat deficiency becomes obvious, shows clearly that even with that waist his taper can't compete.

pumpster · « **Reply #6334 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:14:00 PM »

Quote

I think it's questionable that Coleman has a better taper than Flex...

The difference in lat width is striking, actually. So is the difference in quad size as well as size in most other areas.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #6335 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:23:57 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 16, 2006, 12:11:42 PM

Those pics show once again that that Coleman was bigger everywhere, so a bigger waist is moot. Wheeler's lat deficiency becomes obvious, shows clearly that even with that waist his taper can't compete.

Yeah you got that right bigger everywhere

delta9mda · « **Reply #6336 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:39:08 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 16, 2006, 10:53:24 AM

A very logical and well thought post .

yates mm vz rons seated mm, ronnie looks offseason

pumpster · « **Reply #6337 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:43:50 PM »

ND proves over and over again that he's a novice-what was that pic intended to prove? What it shows is even there, relaxed, Coleman's still got far more of a taper, something Yats could only dream about with his wide spare-tire muscular obliques and less lat and shoulder width.

ND: 1...2...3...DUH! Thanks for more pics proving Coleman's dominance!

nicorulez · « **Reply #6338 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:46:51 PM »

Damn, the ape has more cuts than Yates. Wouldn't you know it, I pulled this pic of Doz off of Google.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #6339 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:53:36 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 16, 2006, 12:43:50 PM

ND proves over and over again that he's a novice-what was that pic intended to prove? What it shows is even there, relaxed, Coleman's still got far more of a taper, something Yats could only dream about with his wide spare-tire muscular obliques and less lat and shoulder width.

ND: 1...2...3...DUH! Thanks for more pics proving Coleman's dominance!

Whos Ronnie dominating? in 94 Ronnie was lost in the feild . and you Einstiens keep referring to Coleman 99 as " pre-gut " Ronnie when in fact he had a nice gut . so before you break your arm patting yourself on the back that picture was intended to prove that 99 was not pre-gut and guess what it worked .

Shockwave · « **Reply #6340 on:** July 16, 2006, 12:53:54 PM »

This thread is done. The conversation is just down to inane babble and name calling.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #6341 on:** July 16, 2006, 01:04:10 PM »

Quote from: nicorulez on July 16, 2006, 12:46:51 PM

Damn, the ape has more cuts than Yates. Wouldn't you know it, I pulled this pic of Doz off of Google.

And you're supposed to be the educated one lol

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #6342 on:** July 16, 2006, 01:09:32 PM »

Hulkster does Dorian's back look ' flat ' ?

pobrecito · « **Reply #6343 on:** July 16, 2006, 01:16:39 PM »

In my opinion Flex wins here....notice the much more deeply cut quads, more striations in the chest, smaller waist, much more defined midsection....

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #6344 on:** July 16, 2006, 01:22:45 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on July 16, 2006, 01:16:39 PM

In my opinion Flex wins here....notice the much more deeply cut quads, more striations in the chest, smaller waist, much more defined midsection....

3........2........1 .........Hulkster ........" Ronnie's not even fully posing yet." lol

Shockwave · « **Reply #6345 on:** July 16, 2006, 01:51:20 PM »

Ronnie cannot his his lat spreads for shit. He seems to bunch his shoulders up too much.

Hulkster · « **Reply #6346 on:** July 16, 2006, 03:00:51 PM »

why do people keep posting a shot of Ronnie doing 1/2 a lat spread?

Hulkster · « **Reply #6347 on:** July 16, 2006, 03:03:32 PM »

Ronnie's waist and taper at the AC:

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #6348 on:** July 16, 2006, 03:04:46 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 16, 2006, 03:00:51 PM

why do people keep posting a shot of Ronnie doing 1/2 a lat spread?

Hulkster you ever consider that at 247lbs his latspread might not be as great as you think it is?

Hulkster · « **Reply #6349 on:** July 16, 2006, 03:05:50 PM »

Ronnie's midsection at the AC:

check out the unreal pecs. (yates does NOT have a better chest than this)

and note the quads too!

from the knees up he is perfection!