and he probably had better biceps than Dorian...
what is your point?
The point is that the average man does not have 21" arms like Dorian did, although anyoone can have 19" calves like Ronnie.
Now seriously, try to the advantage in a arm muscularity that the 1999 Ronnie had, over Dorian, was very small, most of it biceps. Now, you keep trying to make a point that Dorian's arms were weak, when in reality Dorian's triceps were roughly equivalent to Ronnie's in muscularity - with the edge in muscularity going to Dorian when it comes to foerearms -, and Dorian used them to his advantage when it counts: in the side triceps shot.
Now, you can argue that Dorian's triceps were sub-par and took away from him in other poses and from other angles. It's not true, bu let's assume it is. Well, ther medial triceps head is only visible from the back when the one's elbows are pointing outward. This would compromise Dorian only in the rear lat spread. Now, since Dorian's latissimus spreads so wide in this mandatory and he has such superb balance from head to toe, this wouldn't represent such a liability anyway - because, even in this shot, the visibluility of the medial triceps head is small.
As for the inner triceps head, it's visibility is only apparent from the front, when the bodybuilder is flexing his arms. Again, Ronnie would take that - if he had the ticker inner triceps head, which is
not the case when it comes to the 1999 Ronnie -, but since he already wins the front double biceps mandatory at any weight regardless, the point is irrelevant. You could argue that his arms compromise his overrall balance in the symmetry round, but it is actually Ronnie who has unually large biceps for the rest of his arms. Once again, Hulky, you have no game.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
