Coleman had more size in the upper bod to offset, and wasn't as wide across the waist from the front. The problems were in side shots.
I'm sure the audiences couldn't have been thrilled with some of Yates' wins considering that he didn't dominate many of them in cases where the deserving winners were unjustly denied.
Coleman still with a noticable taper, Yates not.
Coleman was small in 2002. Dorian would have dwarfed him. Yates lats are far bigger and wider in those two shots you posted.
As well, I have never heard the crowd unhappy after Dorian being awarded 1st place. Even in 94, where your side claims the most controversy, Dorian still received a great applause upon winning. The same cannot be said about Ronnie. 2001 Ronnie loses the prejudging, yet still wins the contest

2002, He comes in flatter and smaller than a pancake with the gut of his 287lb version and still wins? Now
that is taking away from a more deserving winner, Levrone, who spent his entire career busting his ass.
Dorian was always more dominant than Coleman. In fact, Coleman's career was basically predicated upon what other bodybuilders did. If Dorian had not retired in 98 or if Flex came in shape Coleman would not have won. Both men at 100%, Flex beats Ronnie.