Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

At least use 99 Ronnie against Yates 
 
 
 

I agree with pubic on this one.

comparing 2003 Ronnie to 1999 Ronnie is like comparing 1993 dorian to 1997 dorian:

much bigger, but not always better

although Ronnie's arms were insane that year.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Colemans legs are more dry, seperated and harder, but Yates stomach is more dry, seperated and harder.

Coleman's legs are NOT More dry , he does show better upper quad separation and his quads are bigger but 1993 Yates is leaving Ronnie for dead in this ' comparison '

[Hulkster]

Yates 95 and Ronnie 99 and NO CONTEST at all !

show their quads and you might change that opinion...

[Shockwave]

Colemans legs are more dry, seperated and harder, but Yates stomach is more dry, seperated and harder.

His legs are more dry?
I guess thats why Ronnie's Sartorius is so distinct, crisp, and visible, right?

[NarcissisticDeity]

I agree with pubic on this one.

comparing 2003 Ronnie to 1999 Ronnie is like comparing 1993 dorian to 1997 dorian:

much bigger, but not always better

although Ronnie's arms were insane that year.

Ronnie's whole physique was INSANE in 2003 but not his best by a long shot.

[Iceman1981]

He didn't write that , thats Hulkster talking nonsense.

Can someone find out who wrote it with a source? Thanks.

[NeoSeminole]

Are you and I seeing the same pics? Dorian has more vasularity on his lats (which is a bad sign for the extremely vascular Ronnie), his Intercostals are crisp and distict, as are his obliques. His abs are deeply etched. Ronnies abs and intercostals are very clearly holding water, shown by the blurred lines in the muscles.

I already covered vascularity in my last post. If you want to use vascularity to judge who has better conditioning, then Ronnie destroys Dorian from the front. I never disagreed about Ronnie's abs and intercostals carrying water. So I don't know why you touched on the areas that I specifically left out. My issue was that you claimed his chest, lats, and quads look waterlogged.

[NarcissisticDeity]

show their quads and you might change that opinion...

Show the WHOLE pose , Dorian has him covered from top to bottom , you think having better upper separation compensates for less conditioning , balance , and density? lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

I already covered vascularity in my last post. If you want to use vascularity to judge who has better conditioning, then Ronnie destroys Dorian from the front. I never disagreed about Ronnie's abs and intercostals carrying water. So I don't know why you touched on the areas that I specifically left out. My issue was that you claimed his chest, lats, and quads look waterlogged.

Vascularity is NOT an accurate gauge for judging conditioning , Ronnie's arms are always vascular yet he carries water in other areas of his back .

[Hulkster]

Can someone find out who wrote it with a source? Thanks.

all I know is was the source was obviously a very credible one..

[Hulkster]

Dorian has him covered from top to bottom

yeah, except for those tiny little muscles called quads...

 

[Shockwave]

I already covered vascularity in my last post. If you want to use vascularity to judge who has better conditioning, then Ronnie destroys Dorian from the front. I never disagreed about Ronnie's abs and intercostals carrying water. So I don't know why you touched on the areas that I specifically left out. My issue was that you claimed his chest, lats, and quads look waterlogged.

I agree. I said that Ronnie is normally EXTREMELY vascular, so when Yates appears more vascular, it's a sign that Ronnie is off from his usual stellar conditioning.
Regardless, I stand by my statement. His quads have the same puffy, blurred lines as his midsection, his Sartorius is ample evidence of this. Compare that to his 01AC condition. I do admit that his upper quads are more separated, but I wonder if that has to do more with overdeveloped upper muscles, maybe why Ronnie's quads appear so top heavy?

[NarcissisticDeity]

all I know is was the source was obviously a very credible one..

LMFAO thats from 1996 you know the year where Dorian beat Ronnie four times in one year lol Ronnie cannout touch Dorian in the back he is comparable in some areas buy Yates has a more complete back.

[NeoSeminole]

Ronnie is BIGGER than usual and his conditioning is very very good for someone carrying 287 pounds of muscle , but he's NOT completely dry if he was he's lose size , the best combo of size and extreme conditioning that Ronnie managed was 1998 at 249 pounds or a little less in 199 at 257 pounds , if 2003 rid himself of all water he'd probably be 260 max if he's lucky.

don't get me wrong, I never said that 03 was Ronnie's best conditioning. I feel he matched Dorian's best ever conditioning in 98 and 01 ASC. The reason I advocate Ronnie in 03 is b/c I believe his combination of size, shape, conditioning, and symmetry would prove too much for Dorian to handle.

[Shockwave]

Upon further inspection, is that a slight quad tear I see just above the knee on his left quad?

[Hulkster]

more complete back my ass:

[Shockwave]

more complete back my ass:

Dorian more complete?
Pretty even to me.
Dorian is more balanced from the back though.

[NarcissisticDeity]

yeah, except for those tiny little muscles called quads...

 

LMFAO tiny  you internet-fan-boy Dorian owns Ronnies legs period , whats the sense of having great quads when you underdeveloped oddly shaped unproportionate calves? whats the sense of having great quad sweep when your overdeveloped glutes rival them?

[Iceman1981]

Ronnie getting outclassed ! Dorian isn't even in contest shape yet and look at his much sharper midsection than a contest Ronnie

Dorian looks good in that pic, but his right delt and whole right arm is dwarfing his left delt, whole left arm and is throwing his physique off balance.

[Bast175]

ok so Narc's dream man is Dorian and Hulk's is Ronnie. 

Let's just agree that you're both gay with different preferences.

[NarcissisticDeity]

more complete back my ass:

Ronnie's traps can't match Dorians first of all and second of all the detail & development of the lowerlats can't match Dorian and third of all neither can his erector spinae , these are 3 areas that Ronnie can't match Yates in , there fore his back is incomplete compared to Dorian.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Dorian looks good in that pic, but his right delt and whole right arm is dwarfing his left delt, whole left arm and is throwing his physique off balance.

Perhaps you missed Ronnie's overdeveloped right front & side delt , dwarfing his left? or his biceps/triceps that  dwarf his forearms? I mean lets be honest .

[NeoSeminole]

hahahaha...wow, this is a crock of shit.

Ronnie WAS waterlogged. How do I know? Compare the pictures to 98 and 99, and it is clear Ronnie was fatter and holding more water. If you can't see that, you don't deserve to be debating in this thread.

just b/c Ronnie was holding more water than his best ever form doesn't automatically mean he's "waterlogged." According to your logic, Dorian was holding an ocean in 94 b/c he was fatter and holding more water than 93. Ronnie in 03 was still shredded and dry.

waterlogged my ass.

[Hulkster]

LMFAO tiny  you internet-fan-boy Dorian owns Ronnies legs period , whats the sense of having great quads when you underdeveloped oddly shaped unproportionate calves? whats the sense of having great quad sweep when your overdeveloped glutes rival them?

I wasn't saying that dorian's quads were tiny.

I was pointing out the fact that you claimed dorian owns ronnie top to bottom, but you forgot the quads which is a HUGE part of the pose that Ronnie OWNS dorian in..

[Iceman1981]

Coleman's legs are NOT More dry , he does show better upper quad separation and his quads are bigger but 1993 Yates is leaving Ronnie for dead in this ' comparison '

Coleman's legs look more dry in that pic. I swear I must be blind then. In fact coleman looks more dry than yates in that front pose. Yates arms looked all puffed up. I just don't know what more to say. Yates is not leaving Ronnie for dead in this ' comparison .