Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3484393 times)

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18800 on: January 01, 2007, 07:10:50 PM »
Sucky is so stupid he is now posting picture to prove my point hahahahahah.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18801 on: January 01, 2007, 07:11:13 PM »
  Yeah, Coleman's midsection was fantastic in 1999. A masterwork! ::) Even at his worst, Wheeler killed Ronnie. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18802 on: January 01, 2007, 07:12:43 PM »
And here we have Ronnie owning Flex in taper. 248lbs vs. 215lbs for Flex hahahah


pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18803 on: January 01, 2007, 07:14:04 PM »
Lights-Out!

Go back and play in the sand sucky...you have been owned 8)


suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18804 on: January 01, 2007, 07:15:02 PM »
It's obvious you never passed 3rd grade reading comprehension....you are dumb as a fucking brick :-\


  Don't change subjects, you piece of shit! You said that Nasser's back was as wide as Dorian's, and we're not in agreement about that. I have proved you dead wrong. But yeah, Dorian's back was also harder and dryer than Nasser's ever was.;) As soon as I find the back comparison of Dorian and Nasser at the 1997 Olympia, you'll have to delete your account to save face. ;D

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18805 on: January 01, 2007, 07:15:13 PM »
  Yeah, Coleman's midsection was fantastic in 1999. A masterwork! ::) Even at his worst, Wheeler killed Ronnie. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

look...now this douche is trying to change the subject due to being completely owned hahahaha. My dog is smarter than sucky LOL.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18806 on: January 01, 2007, 07:16:43 PM »
Lights-Out!

Go back and play in the sand sucky...you have been owned 8)



  Ha ha ha...ok. Are you saying that Ronnie's taper in that pic you posted is comparable to this? ::)

  Owned :-X

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18807 on: January 01, 2007, 07:17:11 PM »
  Don't change subjects, you piece of shit! You said that Nasser's back was as wide as Dorian's, and we're not in agreement about that. I have proved you dead wrong. But yeah, Dorian's back was also harder and dryer than Nasser's ever was.;) As soon as I find the back comparison of Dorian and Nasser at the 1997 Olympia, you'll have to delete your account to save face. ;D

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Holy fuck...you are dumb!

I have never once said Nasser's back was anywhere near the width, thickness, detail, separation, or condition of Yates. Please go back and quote where I said that you toothless prick. I believe you are talking of NeoSemen.

For some odd reason this moron can't grasp the fact that I am arguing his belief that Nasser's back was no wider or thicker than Flex's hahahahah....MORON!

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18808 on: January 01, 2007, 07:19:06 PM »
  Ha ha ha...ok. Are you saying that Ronnie's taper in that pic you posted is comparable to this? ::)

  Owned :-X

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Not only is Ronnie beating Flex in taper, but also in condition, detail, separation, and size. Flex is down 30lbs to Coleman.

Oh, and quit posting pictures the size of your little penis to prove your moronic claim. Anybody can see that you are obviously wrong. Owned 8)

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18809 on: January 01, 2007, 07:19:34 PM »
Holy f**k...you are dumb!

I have never once said Nasser's back was anywhere near the width, thickness, detail, separation, or condition of Yates. Please go back and quote where I said that you toothless prick. I believe you are talking of NeoSemen.

For some odd reason this moron can't grasp the fact that I am arguing his belief that Nasser's back was no wider or thicker than Flex's hahahahah....MORON!

  No, dumass, you agreed with NeoSperminole and said that "Dorian's back was harder than Nasser's. That's why he has a better back". Quote you? The last time I checked, you can edit your posts, so what would be the point of that?

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18810 on: January 01, 2007, 07:20:34 PM »
Now sucky is making up shit hahahah...what a lame tactic sucky ;)

I expect more from you.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18811 on: January 01, 2007, 07:25:12 PM »
Not only is Ronnie beating Flex in taper, but also in condition, detail, separation, and size. Flex is down 30lbs to Coleman.

Oh, and quit posting pictures the size of your little penis to prove your moronic claim. Anybody can see that you are obviously wrong. Owned 8)

  You are completely fucking nuts. ::) Let's make a poll about this. Ok, who thinks that Ronnie's taper is better than Flex's in the pics I posted ??? It's obvious that the differential between Flex's waist and shoulders/lats is greater than Ronnie's, despite the fact that Ronnie's shoulders and lats are wider. Go get your eyes checked, Pubes. And as far as I'm concerned, the issue is taper, not separations or size. Owned. Yet again. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE


pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18812 on: January 01, 2007, 07:32:33 PM »
  You are completely fucking nuts. ::) Let's make a poll about this. Ok, who thinks that Ronnie's taper is better than Flex's in the pics I posted ??? It's obvious that the differential between Flex's waist and shoulders/lats is greater than Ronnie's, despite the fact that Ronnie's shoulders and lats are wider. Go get your eyes checked, Pubes. And as far as I'm concerned, the issue is taper, not separations or size. Owned. Yet again. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE



Ronnie's taper is superior, clearly.



NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18813 on: January 01, 2007, 07:35:39 PM »
1. Any bodybuilder has won the rear lat spread over another competitor with a better back in virtue of having a better inner and medial triceps head - which is barely visible in this mandatory.

there's no need b/c I never claimed this. I disagreed with your comment that the triceps long head is "so small that it's irrelevant" in the back relaxed and rear lat spread. I already showed you with pictorial evidence why you are wrong. The long head is the largest of the 3 heads, and it makes up the bulk of the arm from the rear. To claim that they are irrelevant when viewed from the back due to their size is like saying the medial head of the biceps is irrelevant when viewed in the front double biceps.

Quote
2. That Ronnie's gut, at the 2003 Olympia, was not visible from the sides and from the front in the symmetry round and during most side mandatories.

I've posted these pics like 30 times. I guess when you know that you are losing, you like to pretend the pics don't exist. This reminds me of when you claimed that Dorian's triceps were more striated than Ronnie's. I even posted a high-quality, up close pic of Dorian's triceps looking smooth, and you still kept saying his were more striated than Ronnie's.

wow, no gut!





Quote
3. That Nasser's back was on Dorian's league in terms of width&thickness. I find this one particularly bizare. Do your really believe this You don't win the rear lat spread and the back double biceps just by having a harder back. I can see this argument when it comes to Dorian vs Jean-Pierre Fux, because the latter was at least as wide&thick as Dorian from the back, and Dorian defeated him mostly due to better hardness and separations. But when it comes to Nasser, it's obvious that his major liability was lat width&thickness: Nasser's back had the width&thickess of Wheeler, and with the added liability that he lacked separations.

I've already demonstrated this. Another person even agreed with me that Nasser's lats were just as wide, if not wider, than Dorian's. If you cannot see that Nasser's lats are in the same league as Dorian's in terms of width, then I honestly feel sorry for you. I don't know what I would do if I started losing my vision. :-\






IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18814 on: January 02, 2007, 10:39:45 AM »
nasser has great lat width, but dorian still has the edge.

nasser's back looked pretty good in the lat spread, but he really got fuckked in the back double bi pose. 
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18815 on: January 02, 2007, 11:40:58 AM »
I've lost count of the number of times I have seen this picture posted in the last few weeks. It proves that Hulkster's got nothing left.


natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18816 on: January 02, 2007, 12:08:37 PM »
there's no need b/c I never claimed this. I disagreed with your comment that the triceps long head is "so small that it's irrelevant" in the back relaxed and rear lat spread. I already showed you with pictorial evidence why you are wrong. The long head is the largest of the 3 heads, and it makes up the bulk of the arm from the rear. To claim that they are irrelevant when viewed from the back due to their size is like saying the medial head of the biceps is irrelevant when viewed in the front double biceps.

I've posted these pics like 30 times. I guess when you know that you are losing, you like to pretend the pics don't exist. This reminds me of when you claimed that Dorian's triceps were more striated than Ronnie's. I even posted a high-quality, up close pic of Dorian's triceps looking smooth, and you still kept saying his were more striated than Ronnie's.

wow, no gut!





I've already demonstrated this. Another person even agreed with me that Nasser's lats were just as wide, if not wider, than Dorian's. If you cannot see that Nasser's lats are in the same league as Dorian's in terms of width, then I honestly feel sorry for you. I don't know what I would do if I started losing my vision. :-\







Nasser's lat width was never the issue...it was his lack of detail in the BDB pose that did him in, he was soft and didn't show as much musclularity in the upper back....
nasser=piece of shit

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18817 on: January 02, 2007, 12:11:48 PM »
Coleman cannot compare to this!

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18818 on: January 02, 2007, 01:58:47 PM »
Nasser's lat width was never the issue...it was his lack of detail in the BDB pose that did him in, he was soft and didn't show as much musclularity in the upper back....

thank you, I've been trying to tell this to Suckmyasshole. He claims the reason Dorian beat Nasser from the back is b/c his lats were infinitely wider than Nasser's.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83194
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18819 on: January 02, 2007, 02:09:33 PM »
thank you, I've been trying to tell this to Suckmyasshole. He claims the reason Dorian beat Nasser from the back is b/c his lats were infinitely wider than Nasser's.

At the same weight I think Dorian's back is wider this is from the 1997 Mr Olympia both weighed 270 pounds , its pretty safe to assume Dorian's lats are wider

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18820 on: January 02, 2007, 02:20:54 PM »
At the same weight I think Dorian's back is wider this is from the 1997 Mr Olympia both weighed 270 pounds , its pretty safe to assume Dorian's lats are wider

Dorian is standing closer to the camera in those pics. There's no way Dorian made Nasser look small when Nasser weighed more.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18821 on: January 02, 2007, 03:18:34 PM »
Dorian is standing closer to the camera in those pics. There's no way Dorian made Nasser look small when Nasser weighed more.

 ::)

Dorian is 274 in those pictures, to Nasser's 285....mind you, in 95 Dorian was 255 to Nasser's 275 and Dorian made Nasser look small.

Plus, Nasser was only 5'9". I've seen listings of him at 5'11" but that is a misprint.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18822 on: January 02, 2007, 03:22:06 PM »
Dorian is 274 in those pictures, to Nasser's 285....mind you, in 95 Dorian was 255 to Nasser's 275 and Dorian made Nasser look small.

Plus, Nasser was only 5'9". I've seen listings of him at 5'11" but that is a misprint.

so if Nasser is 1 inch shorter than Dorian and weighed 10 lbs more, then he should look even bigger.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18823 on: January 02, 2007, 03:25:54 PM »
so if Nasser is 1 inch shorter than Dorian and weighed 10 lbs more, then he should look even bigger.

The problem is....Nasser lied about his weight, and also his condition was way off Dorian's especially from the rear. So while Nasser may have weighed 10lbs more, he carried less muscle than Dorian. Clear enough? ...if Nasser truly was more massive than Yates, I'm sure he would have won the contest, as they both look fairly similar.


NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #18824 on: January 02, 2007, 03:33:20 PM »
The problem is....Nasser lied about his weight, and also his condition was way off Dorian's especially from the rear. So while Nasser may have weighed 10lbs more, he carried less muscle than Dorian. Clear enough? ...if Nasser truly was more massive than Yates, I'm sure he would have won the contest, as they both look fairly similar.

well shit, that's awfully convenient. Nasser lied about his weight, huh?