my argument was a parody of yours. So if you think mine sounds retarded, guess what that makes yours? 
Your comment is not a parody of anything but your stupidity. The issue of number of angles that a muscle is visible is irrelevant, because I am talking about the visual relevance of specific muscles in specific mandatories and poses, which makes you bringing up the fact that the calves are visible from more angles and yet no bodybuilder with better calves but inferior everything else has won a contest absolutely immaterial to the discussion at hand. Having superior calves are one hell of a greater advantage in more mandatories and poses than having a thicker inner and medial triceps head. It is a significant advantage in: the side triceps, the rear double biceps, the rear lat spread and the side chest. The inner triceps head is a considerable advantage in only one mandatory, the front double biceps, and a very small one in the rear lat spread, when only the back part of the inner triceps head is visible. Having no single better muscle will give you the nod if you're worse at everything else, but the contextual worth of great calves is much greater than that of a great inner triceps head. I was never refering to the whole judging criteria, but to specific mandatories and poses, where great calves have tipped the scales whereas the inner triceps head has not - the rear lat spread being a good example, you putz. You have been
owned epically, but then, I'm sure you know it and are trying to save face by being a good sport about it and pretend it didn't happen.
according to your logic, Ronnie wins the front and rear double biceps by virtue of having better biceps.
I have always conceaded that Ronnie wins the front double biceps. As for the rear double biceps, this doesen't apply, because it is not the focus of the mandatory - only the name -, and most of the biceps mass is concealed as well. You're so dumb that you actually used another example that proves my point. According to my logic, Dorian wins the rear double biceps because only the biceps peak is visible here, and Dorian has the thicker and harder back, with as many separations, better calves and smaller glutes.
wow, really? Hey guys, Suckmyasshole just made a brilliant observation! 
Sarcasm is not appropriate in this contest, since you seem to be unable to grasp this very simple concept, and keep insisting that the inner triceps head is as relevant from the back is it is when viewed full on. Even when you try to be sardonic, you end up owning yourself. Give it up, dude. You're not on my league.
ND, this is an example of backpeddling.
Like when you said that I back-peddled, because I said that 21" equals 52 centimeters and then changed it to 53?
You pick at straws because you're unable to debate me. You have no arguments, so you keep correcting my spelling mistakes - as if I cared -, the incorrect conversions I do mentally - which, again, I don't care about -, or try to pretend I said things I never did. You say things like that Ronnie 1999 had a back as wide as Dorian, and then fail to prove it mathematically, and give nothing but your own opinion. I wasn't pretentious, and said that I beleived that Dorian was wider, and then gave my reasons for it. You, conversely, flat out said that Ronnie was just as wide. Since you wrote that so affirmatively, I demanded proof, which you failed to provide.
several people already commented on that comparsion, saying that Ronnie's triceps are more striated.
Who cares what they think? My opinion is more important, because I know more. I am an expert. A genius, if you will. Besides the intellect, I also have the knowledge, considering that I've been to some 200 different bodybuilding contests, including a Mr.Olympia - the 1996 one, in Chicago, where I saw Dorian destroy the competition with straight-firsts scores -, and I have spoken to dozens of bodybuilding judges to propoerly understand how contests are judged. When I read through your comments, it's blatantly obvious how stupid you are. You even think that Ronnie's huge glutes added to his muscularity in 2003 when in reality it only ruined his symmetry. This thread is quite blasé to me, and I continue to post here only because it's fun owning you. Look at your histerics. Every time I post, you reply shortly. It's obvious that you give a great deal of importance to my posts. When I checked the time you posted, it's usually withing 20 to 30 minutes of my posts. I sometimes forget about this thread and stop posting for up to a week, because at the end, Dorian will remain better in my eyes and so will Ronnie in the eyes of the spooge-licers, so it's a zero-sum game anyway. Oh well, I'll keep making you my internet bitch for as long as you have the lack of shame to keep posting here.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
