The problem with arguing with you is that you simply don't acknowledge reality. You think you gave a "truly brilliant explanation" but you didn't. Don't assume that b/c Dorian and Ronnie weighed the same, and Dorian had better conditioning and was 1 inch shorter, that automatically means he carried more lean mass. Let's say for argument's sake that Dorian had more overall bulk, this doesn't mean it was evenly distributed on his frame. His arms, chest, quads, and glutes were all smaller than Ronnie's. The only areas where Dorian looks noticably larger than Ronnie is the midsection and calves. For all intents and purposes, Ronnie would appear to have larger muscles overall.
I laugh whenever you say that Dorian had a thicker back. This has been thoroughly disproven with visual evidence. Ronnie's back was just as wide and didn't flatten out in the rear double biceps like Dorian's. By the way, I plagiarized your post on purpose you dumbass. I was tired of dealing with your babbling. So I decided to return the favor.
that was a parody of the way you sound in your posts. 
See what I mean? Why should I rehash my same arguments again, so that this moron can continue to insist on his idiotic drivel?

Logically and mathematically, the conjecture that the 1999 Coleman carried more mass than Dorian is an
impossibility; therefore, I wo't demean my brilliant intellect by addressing it. If you had said that Coleman had as much mass as Dorian, then that would be different. It would still be highly likely that you're wrong, but at least it wouldn't be completely impossible.
As for Ronnie's back beingn thicker than Doriannn's: ha ha ha ha ha. I wonder if this moro actually believe this shit?

And what's worse is that, like Hulkster, he used the "lumpiness" argument to support his cause.

Yeah, ok, that's probably the reason why Wheeler had a lumpier back than Dorian: because it was thicker.

And by the way, individual bodyparts are irrelevnant, since we're talking about overall mass. That's why I used the expression "ovnerall mass". I don't care if the mass comes from the arms, delts, quads, back, etc: it's all factored in already, you dumbshit. That Ronnie had this or that muscle bigger is irrelevant, since the weight and bodyfat level are pretty good indications of overral mass.

SUCKMYMUSCLE