now you are just being stupid.
according to your argument, 1999 Ronnie would barely make the top 10 at the 97 Mr. O. (he placed 9th in his 97 shape)

even though this is the difference:
Please, explain your reasoning 
How the hell did you make that leap? Ronnie 1999 due to much better conditioning would have most likely beat Yates specifically because of the improved conditioning
Ronnie 1997 was ninth place he was 255 pounds and his conditioning was off
Ronnie 1996 was sixth place he was 250 pounds and his conditioning was better than 1997
Ronnie 1998 was first place he was 249 pounds and his conditioning was spot on see a trend here?
Ronnie's conditioning was off in 2006 he placed second get it? conditioning separates first from everyone else with all things being ' equal ' every advantage you claimed Ronnie would beat Dorian he had when they competed in 1996 & 1997 he was missing one part of the formula , he wasn't bone dry or rock hard he was in 1998 and thats why he won , and Flex didn't win in 1998 and why? his conditioning was OFF see a trend here?
So the point is Ronnie had every single advantage you claimed would beat Dorian with the exception of one and thats great conditioning , now he got that great condition in 1998 , 2001 but its all a moot point because Dorian wrote the book on great conditioning , now what happens when the contest is close in terms of great conditioning then the contest is decided with who is bigger ( see Shawn Ray all years ) who had better density , who is better balanced , who is a better poser , etc Dorian has more advantages all years
Dorian 93/95 - size VS Ronnie 98/99 - Yates carried more muscular bulk
Dorian 93/95 - conditioning Ronnie 98 - maybe equal
Dorian 93/95 - conditioning Ronnie 99 - Yates
Dorian 93/95 - density VS Ronnie - Yates all years
Dorian 93/95 - balance VS Ronnie - Yates all years
Dorian has to many advantages over Ronnie , the criteria favors him over Ronnie its that simple.