Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

Ronnie 99 does not have the conditioning to match yates?

 

[pobrecito]

Ronnie 99 does not have the conditioning to match yates?

 

Notice how this douche clings to the most-muscular like white on rice hahahahahahaha

[Hulkster]

Notice how this douche clings to the most-muscular like white on rice hahahahahahaha

shows how little you know about bodybuilding.

the most muscular is one of the best poses for showing off total body conditioning:

[Iceman1981]

How can he have loose skin under muscle , please elaborate on this 

Let's get one thing straight. It seems you are slow in your reading skills.

First, I never said "under his skin", you said so, not me.

Second, That's the genius of the english language (which I don't think you understand), it's the way you interpret what I said. Why in the world would anyone interpret what I said to think I meant "under the skin"? lol, you really have to be an illiterate fool to interpret it that way. When speaking about bodybuilding it's a visual process, not under neath the skin, lol.

Third, what is all of the skin hanging on his lower back in the rear latspread? If his lower back was tight in the rear latspread, it woudn't have any loose skin hanging. Please explain with a reasonable answer. Which I don't think you can.

Fourth, my answer is not an oxymoron. An oxymoron is saying that he has tight and loose skin in the same pose, which I never said. I said "he has tight skin in the crunch pose, but has loose skin in the rear latspread. That means he is doing 2 different poses. Now try to explain to us all in plain english how that is an oxymoron?

[Hulkster]

Notice how this douche clings to the most-muscular like white on rice hahahahahahaha

maybe if dorian had a better upper body and was better conditioned from the front than 99 Ronnie he wouldn't have a problem, now would he?

[Iceman1981]

YOU TYPED he has loose skin under muscle , this statement shined a spotlight on your ignorance NO kidding you can't see under his muscles lol

please explain how he has loose skin under his muscles 

I see your reading skills are quite low. No one has argued about this except you. Try reading my posts agian. It's quite simple when you read slower. How many times do we have to tell you to read slower?

[Hulkster]

Let's get one thing straight. It seems you are slow in your reading skills.

First, I never said "under his skin", you said so, not me.

Second, That's the genius of the english language (which I don't think you understand), it's the way you interpret what I said. Why in the world would anyone interpret what I said to think I meant "under the skin"? lol, you really have to be an illiterate fool to interpret it that way. When speaking about bodybuilding it's a viusual process, not under neath the skin, lol.

Third, what is all of the skin hanging on his lower back in the rear latspread? If his lower back was tight in the rear latspread, it woudn't have any loose skin hanging. Please explain with a reasonable answer. Which I don't think you can.

Fourth, my answer is not an oxymoron. An oxymoron is saying that he has tight and loose skin in the same pose, which I never said. I said "he has tight skin in the crunch pose, but has loose skin in the rear latspread. That means he is doing 2 different poses. Now try to explain to us all in plain english how that is an oxymoron?

ND has no concept of the english language or any reading comprehension skills whatsoever..

many different people have been saying this for months...

[NeoSeminole]

ND has no concept of the english language or any reading comprehension skills whatsoever..

many different people have been saying this for months...

tell me about it. He misinterpreted what I said about quoting others to mean that you cannot accept facts unless you also accept their opinions.

[Iceman1981]

hands down you are the dumbest poster of the history of the internet lol Shawn Ray's calves are better than Dorians lol that alone sealed your fate now just couple that with the rest of your ' assessments ' lol my case if soundly proven. 

Hulkster asked you legitimate questions. It's only fair he gets a respose from you with legitimate answers. Is that so hard? That is why this thread has gone on for over 1000 pages. I've noticed everyone posting on here even Icecold and pubes has admitted when we they were wrong, but when ever you're wrong, you never admit it. Why is that? I ask this question on behalf of the people on this thread.

[Iceman1981]

you are saying that these folds of loose skin are muscle?

 

Are you new to this sport?



does that mean Ronnie has tons of muscle on the back of his head?

lol, good one

[Iceman1981]

Listen is he did have loose skin , water and fat in the specific region of the back you claim it would NOT magically disappear and getting tight as a drum in another lose , these pictures crush your ignorant notion that he was holding loose skin , water and fat in his lower lats and lower back , you can't counter these.

Not one of those pics are a rear latspread. Why are you running away from this pose?

[Iceman1981]

Exactly someone who gets it ! no one is saying the wrinkles aren't there its just NOT loose skin / water / fat thats bull shit , if can't have loose skin in a specific area and then have it magically disappear in the same area with a simple movement of the body NONSENSE oxymoron , impossible.

you're among the smarter posters on this thread you get it ! Bravo

Hulkster already proved you wrong. If you haven't noticed, ronnie is hitting 2 different poses. 1 pose causing his head to show his bunched up skin, the 2nd pose doesn't show any bunched up skin on his neck. Was that so hard to understand? lol. It's the samething with yates hitting 2 different poses. And you claim you know what an oxymoron is? lol.

[Iceman1981]

Hulkster no one is claiming the wrinkles in Ronnie's neck are loose skin , fat and water lol and you're proving my point that its not loose skin its wrinkles and thats it , and we're dumb? you said Shawn Ray's calves are a LOT better than Dorians lol

Please explain the circled areas.

[Iceman1981]

LOL

It's quite pathetic that these nuthuggers can't see it or may I say these nuthuggers "don't" want to see it.

[Iceman1981]

IMPOSSIBLE to have loose skin water/fat in a specific area and it be extremely sharp and detailed in another impossible. its wrinkled yes , loose and fat/water NO

Again none of those are rear latspreads. Like I said you are afraid of that pose. It shows his major flaw: LOOSE SKIN

[Iceman1981]

can someone please point out the 'loose skin' on the FLEXED lower back?

It's in the rear latspread moron. Here, take a look for yourself

[Iceman1981]

shows how little you know about bodybuilding.

the most muscular is one of the best poses for showing off total body conditioning:

[NarcissisticDeity]

Let's get one thing straight. It seems you are slow in your reading skills.

First, I never said "under his skin", you said so, not me.

Second, That's the genius of the english language (which I don't think you understand), it's the way you interpret what I said. Why in the world would anyone interpret what I said to think I meant "under the skin"? lol, you really have to be an illiterate fool to interpret it that way. When speaking about bodybuilding it's a visual process, not under neath the skin, lol.

Third, what is all of the skin hanging on his lower back in the rear latspread? If his lower back was tight in the rear latspread, it woudn't have any loose skin hanging. Please explain with a reasonable answer. Which I don't think you can.

Fourth, my answer is not an oxymoron. An oxymoron is saying that he has tight and loose skin in the same pose, which I never said. I said "he has tight skin in the crunch pose, but has loose skin in the rear latspread. That means he is doing 2 different poses. Now try to explain to us all in plain english how that is an oxymoron?

First, I never said "under his skin", you said so, not me.

Why do you continue to type this? I never said YOU said ' under his skin ' you said this

Under those muscles are the loose skin idiot. how come all of us see it but you can't? You're a joke if you say that you don't see it. I guess all of us are blind. By the way, you still haven't circled it. Circle it for all of us to see. It doesn't matter where you circle, the pic proves you wrong and proves my points.

and I called you on it and now you're frustrated because you really fucked up and wished you never typed it , again HOW can a person have loose skin ' Under those muscles'? its impossible to have skin ' UNDER THOSE MUSCLES, stop trying to change the subject you typed this nonsense not me 

Second, That's the genius of the english language (which I don't think you understand), it's the way you interpret what I said. Why in the world would anyone interpret what I said to think I meant "under the skin"? lol, you really have to be an illiterate fool to interpret it that way. When speaking about bodybuilding it's a visual process, not under neath the skin, lol.

No its the way you typed

Under those muscles are the loose skin idiot. how come all of us see it but you can't? You're a joke if you say that you don't see it. I guess all of us are blind. By the way, you still haven't circled it. Circle it for all of us to see. It doesn't matter where you circle, the pic proves you wrong and proves my points.

Now obvious you didn't mean underneath those muscles because its directly in that area of the erector spinae and lower latimus and ' underneath ' those muscles is the glutes so why would I interpret it any other way? the area you claimed he has ' loose hanging skin ; is lower latisimus and erector spinae , below those muscles are the glutes , learn anatomy before you type

Third, what is all of the skin hanging on his lower back in the rear latspread? If his lower back was tight in the rear latspread, it woudn't have any loose skin hanging. Please explain with a reasonable answer. Which I don't think you can.

You keep harping on two areas and claiming its loose hanging skin , his lower back which shows wrinkles and then is lower latimus , neither is loose hanging skin its unflexed lower lats and erector spinae , if it was loose hanging skin it would NOT be tight in other poses it can't be loose in the rear latspread and then tighten in the crunched poses if it really was loose hanging skin it would obscure the detail and sharpness in the crunched pose and it doesn't , it can't be loose and tight thats an oxymoron

so once again learn anatomy before you type he can't have loose hanging skin UNDER THOSE MUSCLES because the muscles below are the glutes so either way you're DEAD WRONG 

[Hulkster]

great comparsions yet again Iceman.

Dorian getting owned as usual.

what do you think the excuses will be this time?

[IceCold]

shows how little you know about bodybuilding.

the most muscular is one of the best poses for showing off total body conditioning:

wrong again.

this post doest not show the midsection.

ronnie hides his gut and 4 pac with that pose.

he also hides his gyno.

this pose show everthing - legs from the side, midsection, arms, delts, etc.




many others have a better most muscular than ronnie.  no one has a better side tricep than yates.

[IceCold]

It's in the rear latspread moron. Here, take a look for yourself

how can you have 'loose skin' in one pose and not another involving the same muscle group?

explain that?

[IceCold]

great comparsions yet again Iceman.

Dorian getting owned as usual.

what do you think the excuses will be this time?

no excuses.

but it still is just 1 POSE.

if that pose were that important, than ronnie WOULD NOT be an 8 time olympia winner.

many have a better mm than ronnie.

[NeoSeminole]

hey Suckmyasshole, speak on this.

listen to yourself, you idiot. You claim that I purposely ignore certain parts of your posts yet you mention in the same sentence that I replied to them. Make up your mind.

not really. My argument is assuming there is such a thing as looking "grainy." I don't believe there is. Where exactly do you see this "grain" on Dorian? His arms, delts, pecs, quads and glutes all look smooth to me. This is the opposite of what you claim - he's covered everywhere in bumps. I'm just entertaining your nonsense. If you make such retarded statements, then don't be surprised if you get a retarded response.

bullshit, Branch Warren has the same "look" as Dorian. How do you determine grainyness then?

completely irrelevant. If I challenged you to a 100 meter race and then you challenged me to a marathon, then I'm not the one trying to weasel my way out of the situation. I had no intentions of entering an online bodybuilding competition to begin with. I'm simply asking you to throw up a pic of yourself from your prime to compare with me at 21 yrs old. It only takes you a few seconds to look for a pic. Conversely, it would take me several months to get in shape for a bodybuilding contest.

[Iceman1981]

Why do you continue to type this? I never said YOU said ' under his skin ' you said this

Under those muscles are the loose skin idiot. how come all of us see it but you can't? You're a joke if you say that you don't see it. I guess all of us are blind. By the way, you still haven't circled it. Circle it for all of us to see. It doesn't matter where you circle, the pic proves you wrong and proves my points.

and I called you on it and now you're frustrated because you really fucked up and wished you never typed it , again HOW can a person have loose skin ' Under those muscles'? its impossible to have skin ' UNDER THOSE MUSCLES, stop trying to change the subject you typed this nonsense not me 

No its the way you typed

Under those muscles are the loose skin idiot. how come all of us see it but you can't? You're a joke if you say that you don't see it. I guess all of us are blind. By the way, you still haven't circled it. Circle it for all of us to see. It doesn't matter where you circle, the pic proves you wrong and proves my points.

Now obvious you didn't mean underneath those muscles because its directly in that area of the erector spinae and lower latimus and ' underneath ' those muscles is the glutes so why would I interpret it any other way? the area you claimed he has ' loose hanging skin ; is lower latisimus and erector spinae , below those muscles are the glutes , learn anatomy before you type


You keep harping on two areas and claiming its loose hanging skin , his lower back which shows wrinkles and then is lower latimus , neither is loose hanging skin its unflexed lower lats and erector spinae , if it was loose hanging skin it would NOT be tight in other poses it can't be loose in the rear latspread and then tighten in the crunched poses if it really was loose hanging skin it would obscure the detail and sharpness in the crunched pose and it doesn't , it can't be loose and tight thats an oxymoron

so once again learn anatomy before you type he can't have loose hanging skin UNDER THOSE MUSCLES because the muscles below are the glutes so either way you're DEAD WRONG 

I didn't fuck up on anything. You just can't read properly. Again, show me where I said "under his skin"? lol, you can't because I never said that, you did. If you reread what I typed, you will see I never said that. By the way, you're (supposedly) a grown man. How come you still have reading problems that a little child doesn't have? You better resolve that issue soon.

LOL, so now you're saying he is not flexing his lower lats and erector spinae? That's his problem and it shows his flaws, LOOSE SKIN.

I prove all of your statements wrong with pics. What do you have?

[Iceman1981]

how can you have 'loose skin' in one pose and not another involving the same muscle group?

explain that?

I've already explained it. Where have you been? lol. I have also provided my proof with pics. What have you guys done? All you guys do is pose a "crunch pose", but it is the "rear latspread" that shows his loose skin that is hanging. Take a look and prove me wrong. Hulkster has already proved ND wrong with his Coleman example. He showed Coleman in "2 different poses". 1 pose showing bunched up skin on the back of his head and the other pose he didn't have bunched up skin on the back of his head. Samething with yates in the "crunch and "rear latspread" pose. That is not too hard to understand especially when I'm clearly showing it to you guys with pics. I back up my statements with hard core facts= PICS