nukka please! That's just crazy talk.
Why? Explain why Ronnie's supposedly superior pectoralis, deltoids and arms would work for him better against Dorian? Start with th3e symmetry round and then move on to the mandatories. I have already written extensively about this topic, so tehre's no need for me to go there again.
who exactly are these guys you speak of? I want to see the quotes and sources. It's easy to say "well, lots of people agree with me" but harder to back it up.
Peter McGough is one of them. He said in a FLEX editorial entitled "Dorian's Delicate Conditioning", from a 2005 issue, that:
"No bodybuilder has ever been as hard and dry as the man who won six Sandows." Julian Schmidt also said that Dorian's conditioning was the best of all times in an articel from FLEX. What he said was this:
"Dorian Yates, the hardest, most annealed bodybuilder in history. He makes the other pros look like they are off-season."
This quote was from July, 1998, so may disconsider it.
John Montana, commenting about the 1997 Olympia in 2003, remarked that Dorian looked awful with his distended gut and torn triceps, but that he still brought his trade-marked conditioning to the table, which he refered to as the best of all times.
As for the sources, I have the issues of FLEX where they are quoted, but I don't own a scanner. I promisse that I will search through my mags and tell you the exact issue so that you can search them through FLEX's archive.
SUCKMYMUSCLE