Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Iceman1981]

Yeah if your ass is almost as wide as your lats then you have some impressive lats 

Like I said the only think that he improved since his 99 showing were his traps and a bit thickeness in the upper back and lets not forget the gut  that was a big big improvement, his prime in 2003 my ass 

Hey, you have your opinion and I have mine. I'm not here to convince anyone. I'm not going to post all day about this. We all have different views. I'll just leave it at that.

[pumpster]

LOL, what monster ownage? He still hasn't shown us pics of any bodybuilder with more muscle mass than 03' Ronnie's back. Nice ownage, LOL.

YOU MEAN THEY HAVE TO PROVE OWNAGE? BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[pumpster]

Yates' traps look invisible by comparison.

Coleman's lats are overflowing they're so wide.

[Hulkster]

its funny how Forced Reps started out on this thread by posting great fair screencaps showing both dorian and ronnie at their respective bests that were so damaging to the dorian side that all they could do was claim they were 'fake'..and yet they were a fair set of excellent copmarisons.

now, he is specifically looking for shots of Ronnie to make him look bad compared to dorian...

 

[Hulkster]

if you guys want to debate blurry relaxed Ronnie back pics, why don't you use a clear pic:

blows dorian out of the water:

[Hulkster]

even Ronnie that weighed 10 pounds less than Dorian STILL had lats on par with dorian's.

[Hulkster]

Can you spell SMALL STRUCTURE ?

Can you spell YOU ARE RETARDED?

 

[pobrecito]

Just face it Hulkster, Ronnie's back simply wasn't on par with Yates or Haney.

[IceCold]

LOL, what monster ownage? He still hasn't shown us pics of any bodybuilder with more muscle mass than 03' Ronnie's back. Nice ownage, LOL.

yates would make coleman look like he showed up for a guest posing.

[Hulkster]

no, his back is not on par with haney or yates... not at all..

[Hulkster]

yates would make coleman look like he showed up for a guest posing.

you mean like this?

in his best condition EVER dorian looks to be about 8 weeks out from a contest..

[NeoSeminole]

I normally don't use the word "ownage" much, but the Dorian nuthuggers have really taken a beating after false claims that Dorian's and Lee Haney's lats were bigger than Ronnie's. You would have to be either retarded and/or blind to still believe they were wider after the wealth of visual evidence and testimony put forth. Talk about ownage.

[Hulkster]

I can't believe people are saying that ronnie has "water logged mass" and that dorian would "make ronnie look like he showed up for a guest posing exhibition" when dorian showed up looking like THIS ALL THE TIME:

 

do any of these idiots even know what they are typing?

[Hulkster]

LOL guest posing routine my white ass:

[IceCold]

LOL guest posing routine my white ass:

smart guy, i was referring to iceman's comments about ronnie in 03.

[forcedreps]

its funny how Forced Reps started out on this thread by posting great fair screencaps showing both dorian and ronnie at their respective bests that were so damaging to the dorian side that all they could do was claim they were 'fake'..and yet they were a fair set of excellent copmarisons.

now, he is specifically looking for shots of Ronnie to make him look bad compared to dorian...

  

You and pumpster are the assclowns here that compare coleman at his best with this yates at his worst black and white pics lately, you are the retard

I don't even try to let coleman look bad in the relaxed pics, it was just to show that coleman looks not near as wide standing relaxed compared with yates.

My pics from 1999 show how coleman looked relaxed , if you have a problem with that just don't look at the pics and don't go on my tits.

IMO haney and yates have both much better lat's, sure coleman has a great back thickness but his lats are not on par with yates and haney.

Structure advantage goes to yates and haney no question.

After all the stupid comparisons from the coleman side lately I really tend to say the coleman side is more retarded  LOL

How can you compare coleman at his best vs yates at his almost worst ? 

BTW, what has your pic of colemans back to do with structure, I have never said he looks like shit or he has 0 back, he has just a small structure, really easy to see if he stands relaxed and of course he has not the thickest lats, easy to see in the front double biceps and if he turns to the side.

A structure is even to see if you stand relaxed so look at the relaxed pics again and tell me where you can see a great structure behind colemans mass.

Also perfect lats should be thick from every angle, just show me colemans thick lats from the side, good luck.


If you have no knowledge just don't give me shit, structure has nothing to do with muscle mass.

Guys with a great structure don't need 260 + lbs to look wide, they look wide cause of their better bone structure.

But go on and compare yates at his worst with coleman at his best , that only shows us all the real retard here

[IceCold]

You and pumpster are the assclowns here that compare coleman at his best with this yates at his worst black and white pics lately, you are the retard

I don't even try to let coleman look bad in the relaxed pics, it was just to show that coleman looks not near as wide standing relaxed compared with yates.



But go on and compare yates at his worst with coleman at his best , that only shows us all the real retard here

exactly

cue the 96 grand prix photos.

no one is worse at that then pumpster - a clown who wont even go to a gym.

[suckmymuscle]

actually no, the only person who said you "owned" me was someone from your own side.

  Mussolini said that I owned you, and he is impartial in this thread. Oliver Klaushof also said that I owned you, and while he prefers Dorian, he posted very little in this thread and couldnīt care less either way.

stop lying. Here is your exact quote.

You were specifically referring to the triceps. I said Dorian wins the side triceps b/c he presents an overall better package in this pose.

  Ugh...where am I lying? This is exactly what I meant: that Dorian doesenīt need having a bigger triceps, delts, etc than Ronnie because he makes his work best for him when it counts. The perfect example is the triceps. Dorianīs overral triceps are smaller than Ronnieīs, but it doesenīt matter, because Dorianīs triceps look superior to Ronnieīs in the side triceps pose. Whatīs the point of having bigger triceps if theylook inferior where it counts? That]s my point, which you donīt seem to comprehend.

oh bullshit. That's like asking "how can Dorian win the front or back double biceps with no biceps?" Ronnie looks more complete from head to toe in the front lat spread. He has better arms, delts and traps, better definition, better shape, and better taper.

  The lats are the primary muscle displayed in the front lat spread, and represents a much greater amount of muscle mass than the biceps is in hte back double biceps. Displaying the biceps takes a back seat to the huge back muscles that are displayed in the back double biceps, but the lats in the front lat spread represents the muscles. So poor analogy once again. It is like comparing apples and oranges

You are a Dorian guy just like Pubes.

  You are far more of a Ronnie guy than I ever was of Dorian, so donīt play saint in this thread. You have already said that the 2003 version of Coleman would defeat Sergio Oliva, for fuck sake! That would already be nut-hugging if you said that about the 1998 version of Ronnie defeating Oliva, but saying that about the preganant bitch that was Coleman in 2003 is laughable, and exposes you for the spooge-sucker that you truly are. And who gives a shit what he thinks? I donīt. Itīs just an opinion, and I am by no means forced to agree with it just because he is on "my side". So now I have to agree with everyone who is pro-Dorian?

there is a HUGE difference between claiming you heard people say something and actually posting the quotes along with the sources to back up your claim.

  I have already stated that I couldnīt care less about quotes, so I donīt get why you keep bringing it up. To be honest with you, I donīt give a flying fuck about what you think. I posted the McGough quote and tyold you exactly from what year it was, and even the name of the editorial. I posted that quote to counter your argument that McGough had said that Coleman was the hardest ever, and that is goof enough for me.]

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[forcedreps]

exactly

cue the 96 grand prix photos.

no one is worse at that then pumpster - a clown who wont even go to a gym.

I really tend to agree with you.

Like all the shit he wrote about yates and haneys weak arms 

What was it again ?  I think 17 inch or so, I normally don't make jokes about poor guys that have not enough money to go to a gym but I cannot resist this time 

17 inch must be the max arm size that you can build on a bowflex LOL

Hey pumpster here is a pic for you of haneys 17 inch arm, only cause 17 inch is the max that you could get on the bowfex doesn't mean that haney had 17 inch arms 

I bet both of your arms don't have the size of one haney arm   

[Iceman1981]

exactly

cue the 96 grand prix photos.

no one is worse at that then pumpster - a clown who wont even go to a gym.

That's one thing that I don't do at all.

 I compare both at their best.

[suckmymuscle]

I have no problem admitting that 99 Ronnie carried slightly more water than Dorian. However, 01 ASC Ronnie surpassed Dorian's conditioning if we use the same criteria (e.g. cheek bones, grainy skin, etc)

  No, the criteria is subcutaneous fat and water. Remeber that we are not arguing conditioning here, but your previous claim that subcutaneous fat and water are the only factors in muscular separations. Since Dorian was as low as Humanly possible in subcutaneous fat and water and yuet lacked Ronnieīs overral definition, then your theory is retarded.

Delusional guy. Ronnie at the 01 ASC carried less fat and water than Dorian. Give it up.

  Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure...I guess that he also carried less subcutaneous fat and water at the 1999 Olympia, too, since, you know, he was so far more defined than Dorian...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[IceCold]

That's one thing that I don't do at all.

 I compare both at their best.

agreed.

[IceCold]

I really tend to agree with you.

Like all the shit he wrote about yates and haneys weak arms 

What was it again ?  I think 17 inch or so, I normally don't make jokes about poor guys that have not enough money to go to a gym but I cannot resist this time 

17 inch must be the max arm size that you can build on a bowflex LOL

Hey pumpster here is a pic for you of haneys 17 inch arm, only cause 17 inch is the max that you could get on the bowfex doesn't mean that haney had 17 inch arms 

I bet both of your arms don't have the size of one haney arm   

yet dumpster still pretends that this isnt a problem - that a clown that doesnt even have the balls to go to a gym or even explain why - has the nerve to comment and ridicule one of the most respected guys ever.

not only that, his opinions and arguments are almost as pathetic as his life - proven by where he lives.

he never has any good points, simply posts pictuers of yates in a relaxed pose. 

[pumpster]

IMO haney and yates have both much better lat's, sure coleman has a great back thickness but his lats are not on par with yates and haney.

Pete McGough of Flex, the hero of Yates ballwashers:
"COLEMAN WITH THE BEST BACK IN BB HISTORY".

He completely disagrees with the wacky theories of forced reps and pubes. AND that BACK IS DRY & WIDER WITH BETTER TAPER THAN YATES.. 

[pumpster]

 No, the criteria is subcutaneous fat and water.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

I'm 100% certain that SUCKY carries unusually high levels of subcutaneous fat & water between the ears.